Modeling the belowground response of plants and soil biota to edaphic and climatic change—What can we expect to gain?
- 129 Downloads
As atmospheric CO2 concentrations continue to increase, so too will the emphasis placed on understanding the belowground response of plants to edaphic and climatic change. Controlled-exposure studies that address the significance of an increased supply of carbon to roots and soil biota, and the consequences of this to nutrient cycling will play a prominent role in this process. Models will also contribute to understanding the response of plants and ecosystems to changes in the earth's climate by incorporating experimental results into conceptual or quantitative frameworks from which potential feedbacks within the plant-soil system can be identified. Here we present five examples of how models can be used in this analysis and how they can contribute to the development of new hypotheses in the areas of root biology, soil biota, and ecosystem processes. Two examples illustrate the role of coarse and fine roots in nitrogen and phosphorus uptake from soils, the respiratory costs associated with this acquisition of nutrients, and the significance of root architecture in these relationships. Another example focuses on a conceptual model that has helped raise new ideas about the effects of elevated CO2 on root and microbial biomass, and on nutrient dynamics in the rhizosphere. Difficulties associated with modeling the contribution of mycorrhizal fungi to whole-plant growth are also discussed. Finally, several broad-scale models are used to illustrate the importance of root turnover, litter decomposition, and nitrogen mineralization in determining an ecosystem's response to atmospheric CO2 enrichment. We conclude that models are appropriate tools for use both in guiding existing studies and in identifying new hypotheses for future research. Development of models that address the complexities of belowground processes and their role in determining plant and ecosystem function within the context of rising CO2 concentrations and associated climate change should be encouraged.
Key wordsclimate change CO2 enrichment modeling root biology soil biota
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Ågren G I, McMurtrie, Parton W J, Pastor J and Shugart H H 1991 State-of-the-art of models of production-decomposition linkages in conifer and grassland ecosystems. Ecol. Appl. 1, 118–138.Google Scholar
- Andersen C P, Laurence J A and Hogsett W E 1992 To what extent do mycorrhizae need to be considered in carbon budgets and process modeling efforts? In Proceedings 12th North American Forest Biology Workshop, The Role of Physiology and Genetics in Forest Ecosystem Research and Monitoring. p 145. August 17–20, Sault ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
- Comins H N and McMurtrie R E 1993 Long-term biotic response of nutrient-limited forest ecosystems to CO2 enrichment; equilibrium behaviour of integrated plant-soil models. Ecol. Appl. (In press).Google Scholar
- Couteaux M-M, Mousseau M, Celerier M-L and Bottner P 1991 Increased atmospheric CO2 and litter quality: decomposition of sweet chestnut leaf litter with animal food webs of different complexities. Oikos 61, 54–64.Google Scholar
- McGuire A D, Melillo J M, Joyce L A, Kicklighter D W, Grace A L, MooreIII B and Vorosmarty C J 1992 Interactions between carbon and nitrogen dynamics in estimating net primary productivity for potential vegetation in North America. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 6, 101–124.Google Scholar
- McMurtrie R E 1985 Forest productivity in relation to carbon partitioning and nutrient cycling: a mathematical model. In Attributes of Trees as Crop Plants, Eds. M G RCannell and J EJackson, pp 194–207. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Abbots Ripton, Huntingdon, England.Google Scholar
- Nielsen K L, Lynch J P, Jablokow A G and Curtis P S 1994 Carbon cost of root systems: an architectural approach. Plant and Soil (This volume).Google Scholar
- Ojima D S, Kittle T G F, Rosswall T and Walker B H 1991 Critical issues for understanding global change effects on terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol. Appl. 1, 316–325.Google Scholar
- O'Neill E G, Luxmoore R J and Norby R J 1987b Increases in mycorrhizal colonization and seedling growth in Pinus echinata and Quercus alba in an enriched CO2 atmosphere. Can. J. For. Res. 17, 878–883.Google Scholar
- Raich J W, Rastetter E B, Melillo J M, Kicklighter D W, Steudler P A, Perterson B J, Grace A L, MooreIII B and Vorosmarty C J 1991 Potential net primary productivity in South America: Application of a global mode. Ecol. Appl. 1, 399–429.Google Scholar
- Reid C P P 1990 Mycorrhiza. In The Rhizosphere. Ed. J Lynch. pp 281–315. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Rogers H H, Prior S A and O'Neill E G 1992 Cotton root and rhizosphere responses to free-air CO2 enrichment. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 11, 251–263.Google Scholar
- Thornley J H M 1991 A transport-resistance model of forest growth and partitioning. Ann. Bot. 68, 211–226.Google Scholar
- Zak D R, Pregitzer K S, Curtis P S, Teeri J A, Fogel R and Randlett D L 1993 Elevated atmospheric CO2 and feedbacks between carbon and nitrogen cycles. Plant and Soil 151, 105–117.Google Scholar