Advertisement

Systematic Parasitology

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 103–108 | Cite as

A special technique for studying haptoral sclerites of monogeneans

  • Tor Atle Mo
  • Christopher Appleby
Article

Abstract

The marginal hooks and anchors have been digested from the haptors of the monogeneans Gyrodactylus salaris and Discocotyle sagittata. These structures then can be measured and drawn more accurately than those surrounded by haptoral tissue. The technique also facilitates the study of isolated hooks with SEM. The results of studies using this digestion technique are presented.

Keywords

Special Technique Digestion Technique Marginal Hook Haptoral Sclerite 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cone, D.K., Gratzek, J.B. & Hoffman, G.L. (1986) A study of Enterogyrus sp. (Monogenea) parasitizing the foregut of captive Pomacanthus paru (Pomacanthidae) in Georgia. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 65, 312–316.Google Scholar
  2. Ergens, R. (1977) Problems in terminology of taxonomic characters of species belonging to Gyrodactylus Nordmann, 1832 (Monogenoidea: Gyrodactylidae). Folia Parasitologica, 24, 331–336.Google Scholar
  3. Gusev, A.V. (1978) Some controversial problems in classification of monogeneans. Folia Parasitologica, 25, 323–331.Google Scholar
  4. Kayton, R.J. (1983) Histochemical and x-ray analysis of the sclerites of Gyrodactylus spp. (Platyhelminthes: Monogenoidea) from the Utah Chub, Gila atraria (Girard). Journal of Parasitology, 69, 862–865.Google Scholar
  5. Llewellyn, J. (1988) Evolution of monogeneans. Abstracts of the International Symposium on Monogenea. České Budějovice, Czechoslovakia, 7–13.8.1988, p.33.Google Scholar
  6. Llewellyn, J. & Owen, I.L. (1960) The attachment of the monogenean Discocotyle sagittata Leuckart to the gills of Salmo trutta L. Parasitology, 50, 51–59.Google Scholar
  7. Lyons, K. (1966) The chemical nature and evolutionary significance of monogenean attachment sclerites. Parasitology, 56, 63–100.Google Scholar
  8. Malmberg, G. (1970) The excretory systems and the marginal hooks as a basis for the systematics of Gyrodactylus (Trematoda, Monogenea). Arkiv för Zoologi, Serie 2, 23, 1–235.Google Scholar
  9. Malmberg, G. (1986) The major parasitic platyhelminth classes — progressive or regressive evolution? Hydrobiologia, 132, 23–29.Google Scholar
  10. Malmberg, G. (1988) On the evolution in Monogenea. Abstracts of the International Symposium on Monogenea. České Budějovice, Czechoslovakia, 7–13.8.1988, p.36.Google Scholar
  11. Owen, I.L. (1970) The oncomiracidium of the monogenean Discocotyle sagittata. Parasitology, 61, 279–292.Google Scholar
  12. Wilhelms, B. (1983) Taksonomiske studier av slekten Discocotyle Diesing, 1850 hos fire laksefiskarter i Sør-Norge. Cand. scient. thesis: University of Oslo, 65 pp. (In Norwegian)Google Scholar
  13. Yazaki, S. (1982) Studies on three-dimensional features of embryonic hooks in some species of Diphyllobothriids, with special reference to taxonomic significance. Japanese Journal of Parasitology, 31, 435–446.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tor Atle Mo
    • 1
  • Christopher Appleby
    • 1
  1. 1.National Veterinary InstituteOslo 1Norway

Personalised recommendations