Systematic Parasitology

, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp 171–177 | Cite as

Redescription and new records of Mackoja podirufi (Macko, 1962), with an amended diagnosis of Mackoja Kornyushin, 1983, (Cestoda, Hymenolepididae)

  • Gergana P. Vasileva
  • Boyko B. Georgiev
  • Todor Genov


Mackoja podirufi (Macko, 1962) [synonyms Echinocotyle podirufi Macko, 1962; Podicipitilepis laticauda of Korpaczewska, 1974] is recorded from grebes Tachybaptus ruficollis and Podiceps nigricollis in Bulgaria (new geographical record) and from T. ruficollis in Germany (new geographical record). The species is redescribed on the basis of specimens from Bulgaria and Germany plus paratypes from Slovakia. In contrast to the original description, an external seminal vesicle and a cirrus-stylet are observed, while an accessory sac is absent. The diagnosis of the monotypic genus Mackoja Kornyushin, 1983 is amended. Mackoja is considered to be similar to the genus Podicipitilepis Yamaguti, 1956, with the type-species P. laticauda Yamaguti, 1956, described from T. ruficollis in Japan. A hypothesis is proposed recognising M. podirufi and P. laticauda as geographical vicariants.


Seminal Vesicle Original Description Monotypic Genus External Seminal Vesicle Geographical Record 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Czaplinski, B. & Vaucher, C. (1994) Family Hymenolepididae Ariola, 1899. In: Khalil, L.F., Jones, A. & Bray, R.A. (Eds) Keys to Cestode Parasites of Vertebrates. Wallingford, U K: CAB International, pp. 595–663.Google Scholar
  2. Kornyushin, V.V. (1983) Analysis of the structure of the genus Echinocotyle (Cestoda, Hymenolepididae).] Parazitologiya, 17, 268–271 [In Russian].Google Scholar
  3. Korpaczewska, W. (1974) A note of the first record of Podicipitilepis laticauda Yamaguti, 1956 (Cestoda, Hymenolepididae) in Europe. Acta Parasitologica Polonica, 22, 317–321.Google Scholar
  4. Macko, J.K. (1962) Neue Art eines Bandwurms aus der Gattung Echinocotyle Blanchard, 1891 (Hymenolepididae). Biologia (Bratislava), 17, 503–507.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Macko, J.K. (1963) Auszug aus der Beschreibung neuer Helminthenarten bei freilebenden Vögeln in der Slowakei. Helminthologia, 4, 290–302.Google Scholar
  6. Odening, K. (1965) Zur Trematodenfauna der einheimischen Lappentaucher und des Blesshuhns Abhandlungen und Berichte für Naturkunde und Vorgeschichte. Magdeburg, 11, 119–132.Google Scholar
  7. Ryzhikov, K.M., Rysavy, B., Khokhlova, I.G., Tolkacheva, L.M. & Kornyushin, V.V. (1985) Helminths of fish-eating birds of the Palaearctic Region II. Cestoda and Acanthocephales. Praha: Academia, 411 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Schmidt, G.D. (1986) Handbook of tapeworm identification. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press, 675 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Yamaguti, S. (1956) Studies on the helminth fauna of Japan. Part 50. Cestodes of birds. III. Published by the Author, 23 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gergana P. Vasileva
    • 1
  • Boyko B. Georgiev
    • 1
  • Todor Genov
    • 1
  1. 1.Central Laboratory of General EcologyBulgarian Academy of SciencesSofiaBulgaria

Personalised recommendations