Hydrobiologia

, Volume 247, Issue 1–3, pp 109–117 | Cite as

Ecomorphology ofCrassostrea cucullata (Born, 1778) (Ostreidae) in a mangrove creek (Gazi, Kenya)

  • J. F. Tack
  • E. Vanden Berghe
  • Ph. Polk
Users of the mangals

Abstract

Variations of shell form and shell length were studied for oysters growing in the mangroves of Gazi Creek, Kenya, and related to different environmental factors.

For the study of the form, Fourier analysis was performed on the circumference of 85 oysters. The resulting coefficients were compared among specimens using cluster analysis. The correspondence between this classification and substrate diameter is virtually perfect (only one misclassification out of 85 oysters). For the clusters based on height above chart datum, 9 specimens, all on intermediate height levels, were misclassified. Orientation with respect to tidal current had 13 misclassifications. Mangrove species seemed to influence form only marginally, if at all.

In the study of the size ofCrassostrea cucullata, the length of 956 oysters, growing along two transects were measured, and correlated with several environmental factors. Oyster length was not related to substrate diameter or its orientation with respect to the main current. Length was not influenced by density up to a cover of 70%. For densities higher than 70%, there was a fairly strong negative correlation (r2 = 0.634,n = 217). Length was not correlated with height above bottom (base of the tree) for heights lower than 20 cm, while oysters growing closer to the bottom were smaller. The correlation with height above chart datum was negative but very low (r2 = 0.060,n = 957). However, if all measurements of oysters closer than 20 cm to the bottom, and all from a density of more than 70% cover are deleted from the data set, the correlation with height increased dramatically, the slope still being negative (r2 = 0.859,n = 543).

Key words

Crassostrea cucullata Fourier analysis shell form shell length regression analysis environmental factors 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anstey, R. L. & D. A. Delmet, 1972. Genetic meaning of zooecial chamber shapes. Science 177: 1000–1002.Google Scholar
  2. Anstey, R. L. & D. A. Delmet, 1973. Fourier analysis of zooecial shapes in fossil tubular bryozoans. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 84: 1753–1764.Google Scholar
  3. Chelazzi, G. & M. Vannini, 1980. Zonation of intertidal molluscs on rocky shores of southern Somali. Estuar. coast. mar. Sci. 10: 569–583.Google Scholar
  4. Christopher, R. A. & J. A. Waters, 1974. Fourier series as a quantitative descriptor of miospore shape. J. Paleontol. 48: 697–709.Google Scholar
  5. Comfort, A., 1946.Patella vulgata L. relation of habitat to form. J. Conch. 22: 216–217.Google Scholar
  6. Day, J. H., 1974. A guide to marine life of South African shores. Balkema. Cape Town, 300 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Ebling, F. J., J. F. Sloane & H. M. Davies, 1962. The ecology of Lough Ine. XII. The distribution and characteristics ofPatella species. J. anim. Ecol. 31: 457–470.Google Scholar
  8. Ehrlich, R. & B. Weinberg, 1970. An exact method for characterisation of grain shape. J. Sed. Petrol. 40: 205–212.Google Scholar
  9. Everitt, B. S., 1977. The analysis of contingency tables. Chapman and Hall. London, 128 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Ferson, S., F. J. Rohlf & R. K. Koehn, 1985. Measuring shape variation of twodimensional outlines. Syst. Zool. 34: 59–68.Google Scholar
  11. Gallin, E., E. Coppejans & H. Beeckman, 1989. The mangrove vegetation of Gazi Bay (Kenya). Bull. r. Soc. Belg. 122: 197–207.Google Scholar
  12. Hartnoll, R. G., 1976. The ecology of some rocky shores in tropical East Africa. Estuar. coast. mar. Sci. 4: 1–21.Google Scholar
  13. Healy-Williams, N. & D. F. Williams, 1981. Fourier analysis of test shape of planktonic foraminifera. Nature 289: 485–487.Google Scholar
  14. Kaesler, R. L. & J. A. Waters, 1972. Fourier analysis of the ostracode margin. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 83: 1169–1178.Google Scholar
  15. Kesteven, G. L., 1941. The biology and cultivation of oysters in Australia. I. Some economic aspects. Commonwealth of Australia. Melbourne, 32 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Kuhl, F. P. & C. R. Giardini, 1982. Elliptic Fourier features of a closed contour. Computer Graphics and Image Processing 18: 236–258.Google Scholar
  17. Lewis, J. R., 1964. The ecology of rocky shores. Hodder & Stoughton, London, 323 pp.Google Scholar
  18. Okemwa, E. R., R. K. Ruwa & P. Polk, 1986. The autecology of the edible oysterCrassostrea cucullata Born, 1778: size-related vertical distribution at Mkomani, Mombasa. Kenya J. Sci. Ser. B 7: 9–14.Google Scholar
  19. Ricker, W. E., 1973. Linear regressions in fishery research. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 30: 409–434.Google Scholar
  20. Ruwa, R. K., 1984. Invertebrate faunal zonation on rocky shores around Mombasa, Kenya. Kenya J. Sci. Ser. B 5: 49–65.Google Scholar
  21. Ruwa, R. K. & W. H. Brakel, 1981. Tidal periodicity and size-related variations in the zonation of the gastropodNerita plicata on East African rocky shore. Kenya J. Sci. Ser. B 2: 61–67.Google Scholar
  22. Tack, J. F., 1990. Ecomorfologie van de mangroveoesterCrassostrea cucullata (Born, 1778). Unpublished M. Sc. thesis, Free university of Brussels, 99 pp.Google Scholar
  23. Taylor, J. D., 1968. Coral reef associated invertebrate communities (mainly molluscan) around Mahe, Seychelles. Phil. Trans. r. Soc., Lond. Ser. B 254: 129–206.Google Scholar
  24. Taylor, J. D., 1970. Intertidal zonation at Aldabra atoll. Phil. Trans. r. Soc., Lond. Ser. B 260: 173–213.Google Scholar
  25. Trevaillon, A., R. R. C. Edwards & J. H. Steel, 1970. Dynamics of a benthic bivalve. In J. H. Steel (ed.), Marine Food Chains, University of California Press, Los Angeles: 285–295.Google Scholar
  26. Van Someren, V. D. & J. P. Whitehead, 1961. An investigation of the biology and culture of an East African oyster,Crassostrea cucullata. Col. Off. Fish. Pub. 14: 1–36.Google Scholar
  27. Vermeij, G. J., 1972. Intraspecific shore-level size gradients in intertidal molluscs. Ecology 53: 693–700.Google Scholar
  28. Vermeij, G. J., 1973. Morphological patterns in high intertidal gastropods: adaptive strategies and their limitations. Mar. Biol. 20: 319–346.Google Scholar
  29. Ward, J. H., 1963. Hierarchical grouping to optimise an objective function. J. am. Stat. Ass. 58: 236–244.Google Scholar
  30. Ward, J. H. & M. E. Hook, 1963. Application of an hierarchical grouping procedure to a problem of grouping profiles. Educational and Psychological Measurement 23: 69–81.Google Scholar
  31. Younker, J. L. & R. Ehrlich, 1977.Fourier biometrics: harmonic amplitudes as multivariate shape descriptors. Syst. Zool. 26: 336–342.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. F. Tack
    • 1
  • E. Vanden Berghe
    • 2
  • Ph. Polk
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Ecology and SystematicsFree University of BrusselsBrussels 5Belgium
  2. 2.Dept. of ZoologyUniversity of NairobiNairobiKenya

Personalised recommendations