Hydrobiologia

, Volume 166, Issue 3, pp 269–276 | Cite as

Changes in Kenyan coral reef community structure and function due to exploitation

  • Timothy R. McClanahan
  • Nyawira A. Muthiga
Article

Abstract

A comparison of Kenyan reefs of different historical and observed levels of fishing exploitation showed that more exploited reef lagoons had greater sea urchin densities and sizes, fewer and smaller fish and less coral cover. In the most exploited lagoon the biomass of the burrowing sea urchin Echinometra mathaei increased five fold during the previous 15 years. An ecological study of the three most common omnivorous sea urchin species inhabiting hard substrate within these reef lagoons (E. mathaei, Diadema savignyi and D. setosum) suggests that they are ecologically separated by predation and avoid predators and competitors by occupying different size burrows or crevices within the lagoon. Predator removal through fishing activities may result in ecological release of the sea urchins and result in competitive exclusion of weaker competitors. The most exploited reef had a nearly monospecific barren of E. mathaei living outside burrows suggesting that E. mathaei may be the top competitor. Its ecological release appears to lead to a decrease in live coral cover, increased substrate bioerosion and eventually a loss of topographic complexity, species diversity, fish biomass and utilizable fisheries productivity. Data from the outer reef edge were more difficult to interpret but may indicate similar patterns. Within this area, physical stresses such as waves and currents may be a greater controlling force in regulating fishing activities and coral reef community structure.

Key words

coral reefs Diadema Echinometra mathaei Kenya overfishing predation sea urchins 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bak, R. P. M. & G. van Eys, 1975. Predation of the sea urchin Diadema antillarum Philippi on living coral. Oecologia 20: 111–115.Google Scholar
  2. Birkeland, C., 1977. The importance of biomass accumulation in early successional stages of benthic communities to the survival of coral recruits. Proc. 3rd Int. Coral Reef Symp. 1: 15–22.Google Scholar
  3. Carpenter, R. C., 1981. Grazing by Diadema antillarum (Philippi) and its effects on the benthic algal community. J. Mar. Res. 39: 749–765.Google Scholar
  4. Carpenter, R. C., 1984. Predator and population density control of homing behavior in the Caribbean echinoid Diadema antillarum. Mar. Biol. 82: 101–108.Google Scholar
  5. Carpenter, R. C., 1986. Partitioning herbivory and its effects on coral reef algal communities. Ecol. Monogr. 56: 345–363.Google Scholar
  6. Estes, J. A., N. S. Smith & J. F. Palmisano, 1978. Sea otter predation and community organization in western Aleutian Islands, Alaska. Ecology 59: 822–833.Google Scholar
  7. Glynn, P. W., G. M. Wellington & C. Birkeland, 1979. Coral reef growth in the Galapagos: limitation by sea urchins. Science 203: 47–49.Google Scholar
  8. Graunbaum, H., G. Bergman, D. P. Abott & J. C. Ogden, 1978. Intraspecific agonistic behavior in the rock-boring sea urchin, Echinometra lucunter (L.) (Echinodermata: Echinoidea). Bull. Mar. Sci. 28: 181–188.Google Scholar
  9. Hamilton, H. G. H. & W. H. Brakel, 1984. Structure and coral fauna of East African reefs. Bull. Mar. Sci. 34: 248–266.Google Scholar
  10. Hay, M. E., 1984. Patterns of fish and urchin grazing on Caribbean coral reefs: are previous results typical? Ecology 65: 446–454.Google Scholar
  11. Hay, M. E. & P. R. Taylor, 1985. Competition between herbivorous fishes and urchins on Caribbean reefs. Oecologia 65: 591–598.Google Scholar
  12. Herring, P. J. J., 1972. Observations on the distribution and feeding habits of some littoral echinoids from Zanzibar. J. nat. Hist. Lond. 6: 169–175.Google Scholar
  13. Hurlbert, S. H., 1984. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological experiments. Ecol. Monogr. 54: 187–211.Google Scholar
  14. Khamala, C. P. M., 1971. Ecology of Echinometra mathaei (Echinoidea: Echinodermata) at Diani Beach, Kenya. Mar. Biol. 2: 167–172.Google Scholar
  15. Lawrence, J. M., 1975. On the relationship between marine plants and sea urchins. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Ann. Rev. 13: 213–286.Google Scholar
  16. Lewis, S. A., 1986. The role of herbivorous fishes in the community organization of a Caribbean reef community. Ecol. Monogr. 51: 183–200.Google Scholar
  17. Muthiga, N. A. & T. R. McClanahan, 1987. Population changes of a sea urchin (Echinometra mathaei) on an exploited fringing reef. Afr. J. Ecol. 25: 1–8.Google Scholar
  18. Ogden, J. C., 1977. Carbonate-sediment production by parrot fish and sea urchins on Caribbean reefs. Studies in Geology 4: 281–288.Google Scholar
  19. Ogden, J. C., R. A. Brown & N. Salesky, 1973. Grazing by the Echinoid Diadema antillarum Philippi: Formation of Halos around West Indian Patch Reefs. Science 182: 715–717.Google Scholar
  20. Ogden, J. C. & P. S. Lobel, 1978. The role of herbivorous fishes and urchins in coral reef communities. Env. Biol. Fish. 3: 49–63.Google Scholar
  21. Paine, R. T., 1966. Food web complexity and species diversity. Am. Nat. 100: 65–75.Google Scholar
  22. Pearse, J. S. & S. W. Arch, 1969. The aggregation behavior of Diadema (Echinodermata, Echinoidea). Micronesica 5: 165–171.Google Scholar
  23. Sammarco, P. W., 1980. Diadema and its relationship to coral spat mortality: grazing, competition, and biological disturbance. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 45: 245–272.Google Scholar
  24. Sammarco, P. W., 1982. Echinoid grazing as a structuring force in coral communities: whole reef manipulations. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 61: 31–55.Google Scholar
  25. Sih, A., P. Crowley, M. McPeek, J. Petranka & K. Strohmeier, 1985. Predation, competition and prey communities. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16: 269–311.Google Scholar
  26. Smith, S. V., 1983. Coral reef calcification. In Perspectives on Coral Reefs. D. J. Barnes (ed.). Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville.: 240–247.Google Scholar
  27. Stewart-Oaten, A., W. W. Murdoch & K. R. Parker, 1986. Environmental impact assessment: ‘Pseudoreplication’ in time? Ecology 67: 929–940.Google Scholar
  28. Wharton, W. G. & K. H. Mann, 1981. Relationship between destructive grazing by the sea urchin, Stronglycentrotus droebachiensis, and the abundance of American lobster, Homarus americanus, on the Atlantic coast of Nova Scotia. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. . 38: 1339–1349.Google Scholar
  29. Williams, A. H., 1981. An analysis of competitive interactions in a patchy back-reef environment. Ecology 62: 1107–1120.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Timothy R. McClanahan
    • 1
    • 2
  • Nyawira A. Muthiga
    • 3
  1. 1.Coral Reef Conservation ProjectMombasaKenya
  2. 2.Friends World College, East African CentreMachakosKenya
  3. 3.Kenya Marine and Fisheries Research InstituteMombasaKenya

Personalised recommendations