, Volume 144, Issue 1, pp 25–32 | Cite as

The use of prediction to assess macroinvertebrate response to river regulation

  • P. D. Armitage
  • R. J. M. Gunn
  • M. T. Furse
  • J. F. Wright
  • D. Moss


A technique, which uses environmental data to predict the macroinvertebrate fauna of running water sites, was used to investigate the response of faunal communities to flow regulation below a set of upland reservoirs in Great Britain. Five variables (total oxidised nitrogen, alkalinity, chloride, substratum type and site distance from stream source) were used to predict family presence and abundance at 30 regulated sites. The predictions were compared with the observed fauna recorded in samples taking in spring, summer and autumn. Of the 37 commonly occurring families 22 showed statistically significant trends. Twelve of these occurred at lower abundances than predicted and the effect was greatest in Heptageniidae, Simuliidae, Elminthidae, Perlodidae and Rhyacophilidae. Ten families were more more abundant than predicted and these included Polycentropodidae, Sphaeriidae, Sialidae and some groups of chironomids and oligochaetes. Fifteen families showed no significant trends. Most families showed little difference in the observed and expected frequency of occurrence in the 30 sites but Taeniopterygidae and Perlidae amongst others occurred at less than the expected number of sites and Hydridae, Prodiamesinae and Muscidae occurred more commonly than expected. These faunal responses are discussed in relation to environmental changes arising from flow regulation. The possible uses of the predictive technique in simulating and assessing the effects of regulation on downstream fauna are outlined.


river regulation macroinvertebrates prediction reservoirs 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Armitage, P. D., 1976. A quantitative study of the invertebrate fauna of the River Tees below Cow Green Reservoir. Freshwat. Biol. 6: 229–240.Google Scholar
  2. Armitage, P. D., 1978. Downstream changes in the composition, numbers and biomass of bottom fauna in the Tees below Cow Green Reservoir and in an unregulated tributary Maize Beck, in the first five years after impoundment. Hydrobiologia 58: 145–156.Google Scholar
  3. Armitage, P. D., 1984. Environmental changes induced by stream regulation and their effect on lotic macroinvertebrate communities. In A. Littlehammer & S. J. Saltveit (eds), Regulated Rivers. University Press, Oslo: 139–165.Google Scholar
  4. Armitage, P. D., 1986. The classification of tailwater sites receiving residual flows from upland reservoirs in Great Britain, using macroinvertebrate data. In H. R. Hamilton, B. Kemper & J. F. Craig (eds), Advances in Regulated Stream Ecology. Plenum Press, New York: in press.Google Scholar
  5. Bovee, K. D., 1982. A guide to stream habitat analysis using the instream flow incremental methodology. Instream Flow Info. Paper No. 12, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, FWS/OBS-82/26.Google Scholar
  6. Bovee, K. D. & Cochnauer, T., 1977. Development and evaluation of weighted criteria, probability-of-use curves for instream flow assessments: fisheries. Instream Flow Info. Paper No. 3, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, FWS/OBS-77/63.Google Scholar
  7. Bovee, K. D., Gore, J. A. & Silverman, A. J., 1978. Field testing and adaptation of a methodology to measure ‘in-stream’ values in the Tongue River, Northern Great Plains (NGP) Ceylon. U.S. Environ. Prot. Agency, EPA-908/4–78–004A.Google Scholar
  8. Brooker, M. P., 1981. The impact of impoundments on the downstream fisheries and general ecology of rivers. Adv. Appl. Biol. 6: 91–152.Google Scholar
  9. Bunn, S. E., Edward, D. H. & Loneragan, N. R. 1986. Spatial and temporal variation in the macroinvertebrate fauna of streams of the northern Jarrah Forest, Western Australia: community structure. Freshwat. Biol. 16: 67–91.Google Scholar
  10. Culp, J. M. & Davies, R. W. 1979: Reciprocal averaging and polar ordination as techniques for analyzing macroinvertebrate communities. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37: 1358–1364.Google Scholar
  11. Cummins, K. W., 1979. The natural stream ecosystem. In J. V. Ward & J. A. Stanford (eds), The Ecology of Regulated Streams. Plenum Press, New York and London: 7–24.Google Scholar
  12. Edington, J. M., 1968. Habitat preferences in net-spinning caddis larvae with special reference to the influence of water velocity. J. Amin. Ecol. 37: 675–692.Google Scholar
  13. Eustis, A. B., & Hillen, R. H., 1954. Stream sediment removal by controlled reservoir releases. Progrv. Fish. Cult. 16: 30–35.Google Scholar
  14. Fisher, S. G., Gray, L. J., Grimm, N. B. & Busch, D. E., 1982. Temporal succession in a desert stream ecosystem following flash flooding. Ecol. Monogr. 52: 93–110.Google Scholar
  15. Furse, M. T., Wright, J. F., Armitage, P. D. & Moss, D., 1981. An appraisal of pond-net samples for biological monitoring of lotic macro-invertebrates. Wat. Res. 15: 679–689.Google Scholar
  16. Furse, M. T., Moss, D., Wright, J. F. & Armitage, P. D., 1984. The influence of seasonal and taxonomic factors on the ordination of classification of running-water sites in Great Britain and on the prediction of their macro-invertebrate communities. Freshwat. Biol. 14: 257–280.Google Scholar
  17. Gore, J. A., 1977. Reservoir manipulations and benthic macroinvertebrates in a prairie river. Hydrobiologia 55: 113–123.Google Scholar
  18. Gore, J. A., 1978. A technique for predicting the in-stream flow requirements of benthic macroinvertebrates. Freshwat. Biol. 8: 141–151.Google Scholar
  19. Gore, J. A. & Judy, R. D., 1981. Predictive models of benthic macroinvertebrate density for use in instream flow studies and regulated flow management. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 38: 1363–1370.Google Scholar
  20. Griffiths, D., 1973. The food of animals in an acid moorland pond. J. Anim. Ecol. 42: 285–293.Google Scholar
  21. Henricson, J. & Muller, K., 1979. Stream regulation in Sweden with some examples from Central Europe. In J. V. Ward & J. A. Stanford (eds), The Ecology of Regulated Streams. Plenum Press, New York and London: 183–199.Google Scholar
  22. Hill, M. O., 1979. TWINSPAN — A FORTRAN programme for arranging multivariate data in an ordered two-way table of classification of the individuals and attributes. Ecology and Systematics, Cornell University, Ithaca: 90 pp.Google Scholar
  23. Hilsenoff, W. L., 1971. Changes in the downstream insect and amphipod fauna caused by an impoundment with a hypolimnion drain. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 64: 743–746.Google Scholar
  24. Karlstrom, U., 1978. Role of the organic layer on stones in detrital metabolism in streams. Verh. int. Verein. theor. angew. Limnol. 20: 1463–1470.Google Scholar
  25. Klecka, W. R., 1975. Discriminant analysis. SPSS. In N. H. Nie, C. H. Hull, J. G. Jenkins, K. Steinbrenner & D. H. Bent (eds), Statistical Package for Social Sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York. 434–467.Google Scholar
  26. Madsen, B. L., 1972. Detritus on stones in small streams. Mem. Ist Ital. Idrobiol. Suppl. 29: 385–403.Google Scholar
  27. Moss, D., Furse,.M. T., Wright, J. F. & Armitage, P. D., 1986. The prediction of the macroinvertebrate fauna of unpolluted running-water sites in Great Britain using environmental data. Freshwat. Biol. in press.Google Scholar
  28. Müller, K., 1962. Limnologisch — Fischereibiologische Untersuchungen in regulierten Gewassern Schwedisch — Laplands. Oikos 13: 125–154.Google Scholar
  29. Novotny, J. F., 1985. Effects of a Kentucky flood-control reservoir on macroinvertebrates in the tailwater. Hydrobiologia 126: 143–153.Google Scholar
  30. Orth, D. J. & Maughan, O. E., 1983. Microhabitat preferences of benthic fauna in a woodland stream. Hydrobiologia 106: 157–168.Google Scholar
  31. Raastad, J. E., 1979. Bunndyrundersøkelser i regulatee elver med hovedvekt på insektgruppen knott (Diptera, Simuliidae). Informasjon nr. 8 fra Terskelprosjektet. NVE — Vassdrags direkoratet, Oslo: 62 pp.Google Scholar
  32. Rounick, J. S. & Winterbourn, M. J., 1983. The formation, structure and utilization of stone surface organic layers in two New Zealand streams. Freshwat. Biol. 13: 57–72.Google Scholar
  33. Scullion, J., Parish, C. A., Morgan, N. & Edwards, R. W., 1982. Comparison of benthic macroinvertebrate fauna and substratum composition in riffles and pools in the impounded River Elan and the unregulated River Wye, mid-Wales. Freshwat. Biol. 12: 579–595.Google Scholar
  34. Scullion, J. & Sinton, A., 1983. Effects of artificial freshets on substratum composition, benthic invertebrate fauna and invertebrate drift in two impounded rivers in mid-Wales. Hydrobiologia 107: 261–269.Google Scholar
  35. Scott, D., 1958. Ecological studies on the Trichoptera of the River Dean, Cheshire. Arch. Hydrobiol. 54: 340–392.Google Scholar
  36. Trotzky, H. M. & Gregory, R. W., 1974. The effects of water flow manipulation below a hydro-electric power dam on the bottom fauna of the Upper Kennebec River, Maine. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 103: 318–324.Google Scholar
  37. Ward, J. V., 1976. Comparative limnology of differentially regulated sections of a Colorado mountain river. Arch. Hydrobiol. 78: 319–342.Google Scholar
  38. Ward, J. V. & Short, R. A., 1978. Macroinvertebrate community structure of four special lotic habitats in Colorado, U.S.A. Verh. int. Verein theor. angew. Limnol. 20: 1382–1387.Google Scholar
  39. Ward, J. V. & Stanford, J. A., 1979. Ecological factors controlling stream zoobenthos with emphasis on thermal modification of regulated streams. In J. V. Ward & J. A. Stanford (eds), The Ecology of Regulated Streams. Plenum Press, New York and London: 35–55.Google Scholar
  40. Wesche, T. A. & Rechard, P. A., 1980. A summary of instream flow methods for fisheries and related research needs. Eisenhower Consortium Bull. 9: 122 pp.Google Scholar
  41. Winget, R. N., 1984. Ecological studies of a regulated stream: Huntington River, Emery County, Utah. Gt Basin Nat. 44: 231–256.Google Scholar
  42. Winget, R. N., 1985. Methods of determining successful reclamation of stream ecosystems. In J. A. Gore (ed.), The restoration of rivers and streams, theories and experience. Butterworth, Boston. 165–192.Google Scholar
  43. Wright, J. F., Moss, D., Armitage, P. D. & Furse, M. T., 1984. A preliminary classification of running water sites in Great Britain based on macro-invertebrate species and the prediction of community type using environmental data. Freshwat. Biol. 14: 221–256.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr W. Junk Publishers 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. D. Armitage
    • 1
  • R. J. M. Gunn
    • 1
  • M. T. Furse
    • 1
  • J. F. Wright
    • 1
  • D. Moss
    • 2
  1. 1.Freshwater Biological AssociationRiver LaboratoryWarehamUK
  2. 2.Institute of Terrestrial EcologyBangor Research StationBangorUK

Personalised recommendations