Advertisement

Hydrobiologia

, Volume 109, Issue 3, pp 251–263 | Cite as

Zooplankton-trophic state relationships in some north and central Florida lakes

  • Eldon C. BlancherII
Article

Abstract

In a survey of eight lake systems located in north-central Florida, total zooplankton abundance showed a strong positive correlation (r2=0.87, a=0.01) with trophic state. Zooplankton abundance averaged 1.0 × 105 organisms · m−2 in oligotrophic systems and up to 8.2 × 105 organisms · m−2 in the eutrophic systems. Seasonal variations in total abundance were greatest in the eutrophic lakes where rotifers dominated and periodically produced sharp population peaks (approaching 2.0 × 106· m−2). In contrast, the more oligotrophic systems had relatively stable levels of total abundance and were dominated by copepods. Diversities of the major taxa in the lakes were variable with one to three species of copepods, zero to four species of cladocera, and two to seven species of rotifers dominant at any one time. Planktonic cladoceran communities were often composed of only one or two species. Low cladocera diversity in these subtropical systems was suggestive of increased predation pressure on this group of crustaceans. A comparison of the total crustacean abundance in the Florida systems to those of some of the Great Lakes indicated that lower standing crops of crustacean zooplankton in the Florida lakes may be a response to both predation and temperature.

Keywords

zooplankton lake trophic state Florida lakes 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allan, J. D., 1976. Life history patterns in zooplankton. Am. Nat. 110: 165–176.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, R. S., 1974. Crustacean plankton communities of 340 lakes and ponds in and near the National Parks of the Canadian Rocky Mountains. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 31: 855–869.Google Scholar
  3. Barr, A. J., Goodnight, J., Sall, J. P. & Helwig, J. T., 1976. A user's guide to SAS 76. SAS Institute Inc. North Carolina. 329 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Blancher, E. C., 1979. Lake Conway Florida: Nutrient Dynamics, Trophic State, Zooplankton relationships. Ph.D. Dissertation. College of Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville. 146 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Brezonik, P. L., Morgan, W. W., Shannon, E. S. & Putnam, H. D., 1969. Eutrophication factors in north central Florida lakes. Water Resour. Res. Center Publ. No. 5. University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. 101 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Brezonik, P. L. & Shannon, E. E., 1971. Trophic state of lakes in north central Florida. Water Resour. Res. Center Publ. No. 13. University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. 102 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Brooks, J. L., 1957. The systematics of North American Daphnia. Mem. Conn. Acad. Arts Sci. 13: 1–180.Google Scholar
  8. Brooks, J. L., 1969. Eutrophication and Changes in the composition of the zooplankton. In: Eutrophication: Causes, Consequences, Corrections. Nat. Acad. Sci. Washington, pp. 236–255.Google Scholar
  9. Brooks, J. L. & Dodson, S. I., 1965. Predation, Body size and composition of plankton. Science 150: 28–35.Google Scholar
  10. Carlson, R. E., 1977. A trophic state index for lakes. Limnol. Oceanogr. 22: 361–369.Google Scholar
  11. Clark, W. E., Musgrove, R., Menke, C. & Cagle, J., 1964. Water resources of Alachua, Bradford, Clay and Union counties, Florida. Report of Investigation No. 35. Florida Geological Survey, Tallahassee, 170 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Confer, J. L., 1971. Intrazooplankton predation by Mesocyclops edax at natural prey densities. Limnol. Oceanogr. 16: 663–671.Google Scholar
  13. Conley, R. A., Blancher, E., Kooijman, F. & Feerich, C., 1978. The plankton, periphyton and benthic invertebrates of Lake Conway, Florida. Technical Report-U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station. A-78–2, Report 1, V.3. Vicksburg, Mississippi, 34 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Cowell, B. C., Dye, C. & Adams, R., 1975. A synoptic study of the limnology of Lake Thonotosassa, Florida. Part I. Effects of primary treated sewage and citrus wastes. Hydrobiologia 46: 301–346.Google Scholar
  15. Deevey, E. S., Jr., 1942. Studies on Connecticut lake sediments. III. Biostratonomy of Linsley Pond. J. Sci. 240: 233–264.Google Scholar
  16. Deevey, E. S., 1980. Structure of zooplankton communities in Peten Lake District. In: Kerfoot, W. C. (ed.), The Evolution and Ecology of Zooplankton Communities. Am. Soc. Limnol. Oceanogr. Spec. Symp. University Press of New England, Vol. 3, pp. 685–698.Google Scholar
  17. Dixon, W. J., 1977. BMDP-77, Biomedical computer programs, P-series. University of California Press. Berkeley. 880 pp.Google Scholar
  18. Dumont, H. J., Van de Velde, I. & Dumont, S., 1975. The dry weight estimate of biomass in a selection of Cladocera, Copepoda and Rotifera from the plankton, periphyton and benthos of continental waters. Oecologia 19: 75–97.Google Scholar
  19. Dumont, H. J., Pensaert, J. & Van de Velde, I., 1981. The crustacean zooplankton of Mali (West Africa). Hydrobiologia 80: 161–187.Google Scholar
  20. Edmondson, W. T. (ed.), 1959. Freshwater Biology, 2nd ed. Wiley, New York. 1248 pp.Google Scholar
  21. Edmondson, W. T. & Windberg, G. G. (eds.), 1971. A manual on methods for the assessment of secondary productivity in fresh waters. IBP Handbook 17. Blackwell. 358 pp.Google Scholar
  22. Fontaine, T. D., 1978. An ecological systems model for Lake Conway, Florida. Ph.D. Dissertation. College of Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville. 354 pp.Google Scholar
  23. Gannon, J. E. & Stemberger, R., 1978. Zooplankton (especially crustaceans and rotifers) as indicators of water quality. Trans. am. Microsc. Soc. 97: 16–35.Google Scholar
  24. Gayle, T., 1975. A systems model for understanding eutrophication in Lake Okeechobee. M.S. Thesis. College of Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville. 147 pp.Google Scholar
  25. Hall, D. J., Threlkeld, S. T., Burns, C. W. & Crowley, P. H., 1976. The size-efficiency hypothesis and the size structure of zooplankton communities. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 7: 77–208.Google Scholar
  26. Hasler, A. D., 1947. Eutrophication of lakes by domestic drainage. Ecology 28: 383–395.Google Scholar
  27. Hrbacek, J., Dvorakova, M., Korinek, V. & Prochazkova, L., 1961. Demonstration of the effect of the fish stock on the species composition of zooplankton and the intensity of metabolism of the whole plankton association. Verh. int. Verein. Limnol. 14: 192–195.Google Scholar
  28. Hrbacek, J. M., 1962. Species composition and the amount of zooplankton in relation to fish stock. Rozp. Cesk. Akad. Ved. 72: 1–162.Google Scholar
  29. Hurlbert, S. H. & Mulla, M. S., 1981. Impacts of Mosquito fish (Gambusia affinnis) predation on plankton communities. Hydrobiologia 83: 125–151.Google Scholar
  30. Mallin, M. A., 1978. Zooplankton population dynamics in the Oklawaha lake chain. M. S. Thesis. College of Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville. 74 pp.Google Scholar
  31. Makarewicz, J. C. & Likens, G. E., 1979. Structure and function of the zooplankton community of Mirror Lake, New Hampshire. Ecol. Monog. 49: 109–127.Google Scholar
  32. Marsh, W. T., 1978. Environmental conditions of Lake Rouseau. Unpublished report to Florida Power and Light. Environmental Science and Engineering Inc., Gainesville, 218 pp.Google Scholar
  33. Maslin, P. E., 1969. Population dynamics and productivity of zooplankton in two sandhills lakes. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Florida, Gainesville. 98 pp.Google Scholar
  34. McNaught, D. C., 1975. A hypothesis to explain the succession from calanoids to cladocerans during eutrophication. Verh. int. Verein. Limnol. 19: 724–731.Google Scholar
  35. Nall, L. E., Schardt, J. D. & Burkhalter, A. P., 1978. The effect of the white amur on the aquatic vegetation of Lake Conway, Florida. First Annual Report, Baseline Data. Florida Department of Natural Resources. Tallahassee, Florida, 161 pp.Google Scholar
  36. Nordlie, F. G., 1976. Plankton communities of three central Florida lakes. Hydrobiologia 48: 65–78.Google Scholar
  37. Patalas, K., 1972. Crustacean plankton and the eutrophication of St. Lawrence Great Lakes. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 29: 1451–1462.Google Scholar
  38. Patalas, K. & Salki, A., 1973. Crustacean plankton and the eutrophication of lakes in Okanagan Valley, British Columbia. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 30: 519–542.Google Scholar
  39. Pennak, R. W., 1978. Fresh-water invertebrates of the United States. 2nd ed. Wiley.Google Scholar
  40. Pennak, R. W., 1962. Species composition of limnetic zooplankton communities. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2: 222–232.Google Scholar
  41. Shireman, J. V. & Martin, R. G., 1978. Seasonal and diurnal zooplankton investigation of a south-central Florida lake. Florida Scientist 41: 193–200.Google Scholar
  42. Tonolli, V., 1962. L'attuale situazione del popolamento plactonico del Lago Maggiore. Mem. Ist. ital. Idrobiol. 15: 81–124.Google Scholar
  43. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency., 1973. Report on Lake Minneola, Florida. Working Paper. Corvallis Environmental Research Lab., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, Oregon, 35 pp.Google Scholar
  44. Voigt, M., 1957. Rotatoria. Die Rädertiere Mitteleuropas. Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin. 508 pp and 115 plates.Google Scholar
  45. Vollenweider, R. A., Munawar, M. & Stadelmann, P., 1974. A comparative review of phytoplankton and primary production in The Laurentian Great Lakes. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 31: 739–762.Google Scholar
  46. Williamson, C. E. & Gilbert, J. J., 1980. Variation among zooplankton Predators: The potential of Asplanchna, Mesocyclops and Cyclops to attack, capture, and various rotifer prey. In: Kerfoot, W. C. (ed.), The Evolution and Ecology of Zooplankton Communities. Am. Soc. Limnol. Oceanogr. Spec. Symp. University Press of New England, Vol. 3, pp. 509–517.Google Scholar
  47. Winberg, G. G., 1970. In: Kajak, Z. & Hillbricht-Ilkowska, A. (eds.), Productivity Problems of Freshwaters. Polish Scientific Publishers, Warsaw, pp. 363–382.Google Scholar
  48. Wishart, D., 1975. Clustan 1 C user's manual. The Clustan project. Computer Centre, University College, London. 123 pp.Google Scholar
  49. Wyngaard, G. A., Elmore, J. L. & Cowell, B. C., 1982. Dynamics of a subtropical plankton community, with emphasis on the copepod Mesocyclops edax. Hydrobiologia 89: 39–48.Google Scholar
  50. Zaret, T. M., 1980. Predation and Freshwater communities. Yale University Press. 208 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr W. Junk Publishers 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eldon C. BlancherII
    • 1
  1. 1.Taxonomic Associates Inc.MobileU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations