Advertisement

Hydrobiologia

, Volume 262, Issue 2, pp 109–113 | Cite as

Chromosomes of the Antarctic amphipod Waldeckia obesa Chevreux

  • Vicente Gomes
  • Phan Van Ngan
  • Claude de Broyer
  • Maria José deA. C. Rocha Passos
Article

Abstract

Mitotic and meiotic chromosomes of the Antarctic lysianassoid amphipod Waldeckia obesa are described. The modal chromosome number is n = 25 and 2n = 50. The potential applications of cytogenetical studies in this group are discussed.

Key words

Cytogenetic chromosomes karyotypes Antarctic Crustacea Waldeckia obesa 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Clarke, A., 1991. What is cold adaptation and how to measure it? Am. Zool. 31: 81–92.Google Scholar
  2. De Broyer, C., 1977. Analysis of the gigantism and dwarfness of Antarctic and Subantarctic gammaridean amphipods. In G. A. Llano (ed.), Adaptations within Antarctic Ecosystems. Proc. of the Third SCAR Symposium on Antarctic Biology: 327–334.Google Scholar
  3. Denton, T. E., 1973. Fish chromosome methodology. Charles C. Thomas (ed.), Illinois, 166 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Hedgecock, D., M. L. Tracey & K. Nelson, 1982. Genetics. In L. G. Abele (ed.), The biology of Crustacea. Academic Press, NY: 283–403.Google Scholar
  5. Meredith, R., 1969. A simple method for preparing meiotic chromosomes from mammalian testes. Chromosoma, Berl. 26: 254–258.Google Scholar
  6. Niiyama, H., 1959. A comparative study of the chromosomes in decapods, isopods and amphipods, with some remarks on cytotaxonomy and sex determination in the Crustacea. Mem. Fac. Fish. Hokkaido Univ. 7: 1–60.Google Scholar
  7. Salemaa, H., 1979. The chromosomes of Asellus aquaticus (L.) — a technique for isopod karyology. Crustaceana 36: 316–318.Google Scholar
  8. Salemaa, H., 1984. Polyploidy in the evolution of the glacial relict Pontoporeia spp. (Amphipoda, Crustacea). Hereditas 100: 53–60.Google Scholar
  9. Salemaa, H., 1985a. Karyological studies in Idotea spp (Isopoda, Valvifera). Crustaceana 48: 74–87.Google Scholar
  10. Salemaa, H., 1985b. Karyological studies in Gammarus and Asellus species from Lake Ohrid. Station Hydrobiologique Ohrid, edition jubilaire 1: 245–254.Google Scholar
  11. Salemaa, H., 1986. Karyology of the northern Baltic peracaridean Crustacea. Sarsia 71: 17–25.Google Scholar
  12. Salemaa, H., & T. Heino, 1990. Chromosome numbers of Fennoscadian glacial relict Crustacea. Ann. Zool. Fennici 23: 207–210.Google Scholar
  13. Watling, L. & H. Thurston, 1989. Antarctica as an evolutionary incubator: evidence from the cladistic biogeography of the amphipod Family Ephimediidae. In J. A. Crame (ed.), Origins and evolution of the Antarctic biota. Geological Society Special Publication 47: 297–313.Google Scholar
  14. Vainola, R. & S.-L. Varvio, 1986. Molecular divergence and evolutionary relationship in Pontoporeia (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 46: 1705–1713.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vicente Gomes
    • 1
  • Phan Van Ngan
    • 1
  • Claude de Broyer
    • 2
  • Maria José deA. C. Rocha Passos
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituto Oceanográfico da Universidade de São de PauloSão Paulo-SPBrasil
  2. 2.Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de BelgiqueBruxellesBelgique

Personalised recommendations