Advertisement

Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 32, Issue 1–4, pp 75–97 | Cite as

Latimeria chalumnae and its pedigree

  • Peter L. Forey
Article

Synopsis

Latimeria is the product of a long coelacanth lineage, usually viewed as having changed very little. In this paper a classification of better known coelacanth genera is proposed based on a cladistic computer analysis of 56 morphological characters. Biometrical data are then matched with the classification to explore the possibility of identifying subtle change. It is concluded that throughout coelacanth history there have been changes in the structure of the vertebral column involving an overall increase in the number of vertebral elements, and a consequent crowding of these elements within the abdominal region. These changes may be associated with increasing lobation of the second dorsal and anal fins. In the skull, parameters involving the intracranial joint have also changed in such a way that the anterior part of the skull has lengthened in relation to the posterior part and this may be associated with an increase in length of the basicranial muscle.

Key words

Coelacanth Evolution Phylogeny Cladistics Classification Intracranial joint Fins Vertebral column 

Abbreviations in text figures

Ang

angular

a.o.r

anterior opening of th rostral organ

Art

articular

ba.cr.m

basicranial muscle

Basi

basisphenoid

Boc

basioccipital

bpt.pr

basipterygoid process

c.p.l

cheek pit line

De

dentary

Esc

extrascapular

eth.sp

etmosphenoid

f.e

frontoethmoid

Fr

frontal

Fr.d

descending process of frontal

intr. j

intracranial joint

io.s

interorbital septum

sc

jugal sensory canal

L.e

lateral ethmoid

m.Cor

modified coronoid

Mm

memtomeckelian

m.ot.sc

medial branch of otic canal

Op

operculum

o.p.l

oral pit line

ot,occ

otico-occipital

Pa

parietal

Pa.d

descending process of parietal

Par

parasphenoid

pa.s

parietal shield

p.Cor

principal coronoid

Po

postorbital

Pop

preoperculum

p.o.r

posterior openings of the rostral organ

Pmx

premaxilla, Pre-preorbital

Pro

prootic

Pro.p

posterior process of prootic

Rart

retroarticular

Sc.o

sclerotic ossicle

So

supraorbital

Soc

supraoccipital

Sop

suboperculum

Sp

spiracular

spl

splenial

Sq

squamosal

Stt

supratemporal

Stt.com

supratemporal commissure

Stt.d

descending process of supratemporal

Par.a.w

ascending wing of parasphenoid

Te

tectal

X

level of vagus exit

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References cited

  1. Adamicka, P. & H. Ahnelt. 1976. Beitrage zur funktionellen Analyse and zur Morphologie des Kopfes von Latimeria chalumnae Smith. Annalen des (K.K.) Naturhistorischen (Hof) Museums 80: 251–272.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, R. Mc. 1973. Jaw mechanisms of the coelacanth Latimeria chalumnae. Copeia 1973: 156–158.Google Scholar
  3. Andrews, S.M. 1973. Interrelationships of crossopterygians. pp. 137–177. In: P.H. Greenwood, R.S. Miles & C. Patterson.(ed.) Interrelationships of Fishes, Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  4. Andrews, S.M. 1978. The axial skeleton of the coelacanth, Latimeria. pp. 271–288. In: S.M. Andrews, R.S. Miles & A.D. Walker(ed.) Problems in Vertebrate Evolution, Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  5. Anthony, J. 1956. Opération coelacanthe. Arthaud, Paris. 197 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Balon, E.K. 1991. Probable evolution of the coelacanth's reproductive style: lecithotrophy and orally feeding embryos in cichlid fishes and in Latimeria chalumnae. Env. Biol. Fish. 32: 249–265. (this volume)Google Scholar
  7. Bjerring, H.C. 1967. Does a homology exist between the basicranial muscle and the polar cartilage? Colloques internationaux du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 163: 223–268.Google Scholar
  8. Cloutier, R. 1990. Interrelationships of Paleozoic actinistians: patterns and trends. In: M.M. Chang, Y. Lui & G. Zhang(ed.) Early Vertebrate Studies and Related Problems of Evolutionary Biology, Science Press, Beijing. (in press).Google Scholar
  9. Cloutier, R. 1991. Patterns, trends, and rates of evolution within the Actinistia. Env. Biol. Fish. 32: 23–58. (this volume)Google Scholar
  10. Farris, J.S. 1988. Hennig86 references. Users Mannual. Stony Brook, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Forey, P.L. 1981. The coelacanth Rhabdoderma in the Carboniferous of the British Isles. Palaeontology 24: 203–229.Google Scholar
  12. Forey, P.L. 1984. The coelacanth as a living fossil. pp. 166–169. In: N. Eldredge & S.M. Stanley(ed.) Living Fossils, Springer Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Forey, P.L. 1989. Le Coelacanthe. La Recherche 215: 1318–1326.Google Scholar
  14. Forey, P.L., B.G. Gardiner & C. Patterson. 1990. The coelacanth, lungfish and cow revisited. In: H.-P. Schultze & L. Treub(ed.) Origins of Major Groups of Tetrapods: Contoversies and Consensus, Cornell University Press. Ithaca (in press).Google Scholar
  15. Fricke, H., K. Hissmann, J. Schauer, O. Reinicke, L. Kasang & R. Plante. 1991. Habitat and population size of the coelacanth Latimeria chalumnae at Grand Comoro. Env. Biol. Fish. 32: 287–300. (this volume)Google Scholar
  16. Fricke, H. & P. Plante. 1988. Habitat requirements of the living coelacanth Latimeria chalumnae at Grande Comore, Indian Ocean. Naturwissenschaften 75: 149–151.Google Scholar
  17. Fricke, H., O. Reinicke, H. Hofer & W. Nachtigall. 1987. Locomotion of the coelacanth, Latimeria chalumnae. in its natural environment. Nature 329: 331–333.Google Scholar
  18. Griffith, R.W. 1980. Chemistry of the body fluids of the coelacanth, Latimeria chalumnae. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 208: 329–347.Google Scholar
  19. Hensel, K. 1986. Morphologie et interprétation des canaux et canalicules sensonels céphaliques de Latimeria chalumnae Smith, 1939 (Osteichthyes, Crossopterygii, Coelacanthiformes). Bull. Mus. d'Hist. nat., Paris 8: 379–407.Google Scholar
  20. Jarvik, E. 1980. Basic structure and evolution of vertebrates. Volume 1. Academic Press, London. 575 pp.Google Scholar
  21. Lauder, G.V. 1980. The role of the hyoid apparatus in the feeding mechanism of the coelacanth Latimeria chalumnae. Copeia 1980: 1–9.Google Scholar
  22. Locket, A. 1980. Some advances in coelacanth biology. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, B. 208: 265–307.Google Scholar
  23. Lund, R. & W.L. Lund. 1985. Coelacanths from the Bear Gulch Limestone (Namurian) of Montana and the evolution of the coelacanthiformes. Bulletin of the Carnegie Museum of Natural History 25: 1–74.Google Scholar
  24. Millot, J. & J. Anthony. 1958. Anatomie de Latimeria chalumnae, 1, squelette, muscles et formations de soutien. C.N. R.S., Paris. 122 pp.Google Scholar
  25. Moy-Thomas, J.A. & T.S. Westoll, 1935. On the Permian Coelacanth, Coelacanthus granulatus Ag. Geological Magazine 72: 446–457.Google Scholar
  26. Nelson, G.J. 1973. Relationships of clupeomorphs, with remarks on the structure of the lower jaw in fishes. pp. 333–349. In: P.H. Greenwood, R.S. Miles & C. Patterson.(ed.) Interrelationships in Fishes, Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  27. Rieppel, O. 1980. A new coelacanth from the Middle Triassic of Monte San Giorgio, Switzerland. Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae, Basel 73: 921–939.Google Scholar
  28. Robineau, D. & J. Anthony. 1973. Biomechanique du crane de Latimeria chalumnae. Compte Rendu Hebdomadaire des Seances de l'Academie des Sciences, Paris D 276: 1305–1308.Google Scholar
  29. Rosen, D.E., P.L. Forey, B.G. Gardiner & C. Patterson. 1981. Lungfishes, tetrapods, paleontology and plesiomorphy. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. 167: 159–276.Google Scholar
  30. Schaeffer, B. 1941. A revision of Coelacanthus newarki and notes on the evolution of the girdles and basal plates of the median fins in the coelacanthini. American Museum Novitates 1110: 1–17.Google Scholar
  31. Schaeffer, B. 1952. The Triassic coelacanth Diplurus, with observations on the evolution of the coelacanthini. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. 99: 25–78.Google Scholar
  32. Schultze, H.-P. 1991. CT scan reconstruction of the palate region of Latimeria chalumnae. Env. Biol. Fish. 32: 183–192. (this volume)Google Scholar
  33. Schultze, H.-P. & R. Cloutier. 1991. Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging studies of Latimeria chalumnae. Env. Biol. Fish. 32: 159–182. (this volume)Google Scholar
  34. Swofford, D.L. 1985. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony. Version 2.4. User Manual. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign.Google Scholar
  35. Thomson, K.S. 1970. Intracranial movement in the coelacanth Latimeria chalumnae Smith (Osteichthyes, Crossopterygii). Postilla 149: 1–12.Google Scholar
  36. Tima, V. 1986. Revision of Macropoma speciosum Reuss, 1857. (Crossopterygii, Coelacanthiformes). Věstník Ustřednfho Ústavu Geologickeho 61: 209–216.Google Scholar
  37. Wourms, J.P., J.W. Atz & M.D. Stribling. 1991. Viviparity and the maternal-embryonic relationship in the coelacanth Latimeria chalumnae. Env. Biol. Fish. 32: 225–248. (this volume)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter L. Forey
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PalaeontologyBritish Museum (Natural History)LondonEngland

Personalised recommendations