Hydrobiologia

, Volume 169, Issue 2, pp 209–224

Ecology of fish spawning and nursery zones in the flood plain, using a new sampling approach

  • Gordon H. Copp
  • Milan Peňáz
Article

Abstract

Horizontal zonation of fish reproduction, a lotic-to-lentic succession similar to that seen with increasing stream order, was evident from the relative abundance of larval and 0 + juvenile fishes in three floodplain spawning and nursery areas (lotic, semi-lotic, lentic) of the Upper Rhône River, France. Although the lotic and lentic ecosystems provided similar estimates of standing crop (0 + juveniles), differences were apparent in the reproductive and trophic guild structure of the YOY taxocoenoses at the three sites. A new sampling approach (Random Point-Abundance Sampling and modified electrofishing) is described for early-life fish ecology. The electrofishing method employed is mobile, effective for all sizes of larvae and 0 + juveniles of most species, quantitative, and applicable to a number of freshwater situations; and the punctual data resulting from this sampling approach are comparable both spatially and temporally.

Key words

fish reproduction ecosystem taxocoenose structure early development young-of-the-year electrofishing point abundance sampling 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amoros, C., J.-C. Rostan, G. Pautou & J.-P. Bravard, 1987a. The reversible process concept applied to the environmental management of large river systems. Envir. Mgmt. (in press)Google Scholar
  2. Amoros, C., A. L. Roux, J.-L. Reygrobellet, J.-P. Bravard & G. Pautou, 1987b. A method for applied ecological studies of fluvial hydrosystems. Regulated Rivers 1: 17–36.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, R. O. & S. J. Gutreuter, 1983. Length, weight, and associated structural indices. In L. A. Nielsen and D. L. Johnson (eds) Fisheries techniques. Am. Fish. Soc. Bethesda, Maryland. pp. 283–300.Google Scholar
  4. Antipa, G., 1928. Die biologischen Grundlegen und der mechanismums der Fischproduktion in den Gewässern de unteren Donau. Bull. Sect. Sci. Acad. Roumaine. 11: 1–20.Google Scholar
  5. Bagenal, T. B. & W. Nellen, 1980. Sampling eggs, larvae and juvenile fish. In T. Backiel & R. L. Welcomme (eds) Guidelines for sampling fish in inland waters. EIFAC Tech. paper N° 33, FAO, 00100 Rome. pp. 13–36.Google Scholar
  6. Balon, E. K., 1966. Príspevok k poznaniu vyvázenosti rybích spolocenstiev v inundacnych vocách Dunaja. (German and Russian summaries). Biológia (Bratislava) 21: 865–884.Google Scholar
  7. Balon, E. K., 1975a. Ecological guilds of fishes: a short summary of the concept and its application. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 19: 2430–2439.Google Scholar
  8. Balon, E. K., 1975b. Reproductive guilds of fishes: a proposal and definition. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 32: 821–864.Google Scholar
  9. Balon, E. K., 1981. About processes which cause the evolution of guilds and species. Envir. Biol. Fishes 6: 129–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Balon, E. K., 1984a. Patterns in the evolution of reproductive styles in fishes. In G. W. Potts & R. J. Wootton (eds.) Fish Reproduction: Strategies and Tactics, Academic Press, London. pp. 35–53.Google Scholar
  11. Balon, E. K., 1984b. Reflections on some decisive events in the early life of fishes. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 113: 178–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Balon, E. K., 1986. Saltatory ontogeny and evolution. Riv. Biol.-Biol. forum 79: 151–190.Google Scholar
  13. Balon, E. K. & D. J. Stewart, 1983. Fish assemblages in a river with unusual gradient (Luongo, Africa — Zaire system), reflections on river zonation, and description of another new species. Env. Biol. Fish. 9: 225–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Beecher, H. A. & R. F. Fernau, 1982. Fishes of oxbow lakes of Washington. Northwest Sci. 57: 125–131.Google Scholar
  15. Blondel, J., 1975. L'analyse des peuplements d'oiseaux, éléments d'un diagnostic écologique. I. La méthode des échantillonages fréquentiels progressifs (E.F.P). Terre et Vie 29: 533–583.Google Scholar
  16. Blondel, J., C. Ferry & B. Frochot, 1970. La méthode des indices ponctuels d'abondance (I.P.A.) ou des relevés d'avifaune par “Stations d'écoute”. Alauda 38: 55–71.Google Scholar
  17. Bravard, J.-P., 1985. Le Haut-Rhône français, dynamique naturelle et impact des travaux d'aménagements d'un fleuve et de vallée. Thèse d'Etat, Lyon III, France. 800 pp.Google Scholar
  18. Bravard, J.-P., C. Amoros & G. Pautou, 1986. Impact of civil engineering works on the successions of communities in a fluvial system. Oikos 47: 92–111.Google Scholar
  19. Bruton, M. N. & P. B. N. Jackson, 1983. Fish and fisheries of wetlands. J. Limnol. Soc. Sth. Afr. 9: 123–133.Google Scholar
  20. Carrel, G., 1986. Caractérisation physico-chimique du Haut-Rhône français et de ses annexes; incidences sur la croissance des populations d'alevins. Thèsis de Doctorat. Univ. C. Bernard, Lyon I, France. 185 pp.Google Scholar
  21. Castella, C. & C. Amoros, 1984. Répartition des characées dans les bras morts du Haut-Rhône et de l'Ain et signification écologique. Cryptogamie, Algologie 5: 127–139.Google Scholar
  22. Castella, E., M. Richardot-Coulot, C. Roux & P. Richoux, 1984. Macroinvertebrates as ‘describers’ of morphological and hydrological types of aquatic ecosystems abandoned by the Rhône River. Hydrobiologia 119: 219–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Castella, E., C. Castella & C. Amoros, 1986. Evolution d'anciens chenaux du Rhône après la mise en service de l'aménagement de Brégnier-Cordon. Rapport, Companie Nationale du Rhône, France. 48 pp.Google Scholar
  24. Copp, G. H., 1987. Le rôle et le fonctionnement des milieux aquatiques du Haut-Rhône français comme sites de reproduction et de nurserie pour les poissons du fleuve. Thèse de doctorat, Univ. C. Bernard, Lyon I, France. 97 pp.Google Scholar
  25. Copp, G. H. & B. Cellot, in press. Drift of embryonic and larval fishes, especially Lepomis gibbosus (L.), in the Upper Rhône River. J. Fresh. Ecol.Google Scholar
  26. Cross, D. G., 1976. A method of comparing the efficiencies of electric fishing operations. J. Fish. Biol. 9: 261–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Cuinat, R., 1967. Contribution to the study of physical parameters in electrical fishing in rivers with direct current. In R. Vibert (ed) Fishing with electricity, its application to biology and management. FAO, Fishing News (Books) Ltd. Surry, England. pp. 131–173.Google Scholar
  28. Dauble, D. D. & R. H. Gray, 1980. Comparison of a small seine and a backpack electroshocker to evaluate nearshore fish populations in rivers. Prog. Fish. Cult. 42: 93–95.Google Scholar
  29. Estève, J., 1978. Les méthodes d'ordination: éléments pour une discussion. In J. M. Legay & R. Tomassone (eds) Biométrie et écologie. Soc. fran. Biométrie. pp. 223–250.Google Scholar
  30. Gerdeaux, D. & J.-M. Jestin, 1979. Exemple d'application du chalut électrique dans un milieu tempère très mineralisé. Annls Limnol. 14: 281–287.Google Scholar
  31. Green, R. H., 1971. A multivariate statistical approach to the Hutchinsonian niche: bivalve molluscs of Central Canada. Ecology 52: 543–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Guillory, V., 1979. Utilization of an inundated floodplain by Mississippi River fishes. Florida Sci. 42: 222–228.Google Scholar
  33. Halsband, E., 1967. Basic principles of electric fishing. In R. Vibert (ed) Fishing with electricity, its application to biology and management. FAO, Fishing News (Books) Ltd. Surry, England. pp. 57–64.Google Scholar
  34. Halyk, L. C. & E. K. Balon, 1983. Structure and ecological production of the fish taxocene of a small floodplain system. Can. J. Zool. 61: 2446–2464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hergenrader, G. L., L. G. Harrow, R. G. King, G. F. Cada & A. B. Schlesinger, 1982. Larval fishes in the Missouri River and the effects of entrainment. In L. W. Hesse, G. L. Hergenrader, H. S. Lewis, S. D. Reetz & A. B. Schlesinger (eds) The Middle Missouri River. Missouri River Study Group, St. Louis. pp. 185–223.Google Scholar
  36. Hickley, P. & R. G. Baily, 1986. Fish communities in the perennial wetland of the Sudd, Southern Sudan. Freshwat. Biol. 16: 697–709.Google Scholar
  37. Holcík, J., 1987. Some aspects of fish production in streams with particular reference to flood plain rivers. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. (in press)Google Scholar
  38. Holland, L. E., 1986. Distribution of early life history stages of fishes in selected pools of the Upper Mississippi River. Hydrobiologia 136: 121–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Huet, M., 1949. Aperçu des relations entre la pente et les populations piscicole des eaux courantes. Schweiz. Zeit. Hydrol. 11: 332–351.Google Scholar
  40. Illies, J. & L. Botasaneanu, 1963. Problèmes et méthodes de la classification et de la zonation écologique des eaux courantes, considerées surtout de point de vue faunistique. Mitt. int. Ver. Limnol. 12: 1–57.Google Scholar
  41. Keast, A., 1978. Trophic and spatial interrelationships in the fish species of an Ontario temperate lake. Envir. Biol. Fishes 3: 7–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Koblickaja, A. P., 1981. Key for identifying young freshwater fishes (in Russian), Food Industry Publ. House, Moscow. 208 pp.Google Scholar
  43. Kryzhanovsky, S. G., 1949a. Développement des Cyprins, Loches, etc. In Trav. Inst. Morphologie anim. Acad. U.R.S.S., I. (Loches) (in Russian) pp. 186–198 (orig. not seen, from Spillmann 1961)Google Scholar
  44. Kushlan, J. A., 1976. Environmental stability and fish community diversity. Ecology 57: 821–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lange, N. O. & Ye. N. Dmitriyeva, 1973. Some characteristics of the effect of similiar environmental factors on juvenile fishes of different ecological groups. J. Ichthyol. 13: 849–908.Google Scholar
  46. Le Cren, E. D., 1962. The efficiency of reproduction and recruitment in freshwater fish. In E. D. Le Cren & M. W. Holgate (eds) The exploitation of natural animal populations. John Wiley & Sons, NY. pp. 283–296.Google Scholar
  47. Mahon, R., 1980. Accuracy of catch-effort methods for estimating fish density and biomass in streams. Biol. Fish. 5: 343–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mann, R. H. K., 1971. The populations, growth and production of fish in four small streams in Southern England. J. Anim. Ecol. 40: 155–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mathews, C. P., 1971. Contribution of young fish to total production of fish in the River Thames near Reading. J. Fish. Biol. 3: 157–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nelva, A., H. Persat & D. Chessel, 1979. Une nouvelle méthode d'étude des peuplements ichtyologiques dans les grands cours d'eau par échantillonnage ponctuel d'abondance. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris. t. 289, Série D: 1295–1298.Google Scholar
  51. Nelva, A., E. Pattee, J. F. Perrin, H. Persat & A. L. Roux, 1981. Structure et fonctionnement des écosystèmes du Haut-Rhône français. 25. Premières observations sur les populations piscicole dans le secteur Brégnier-Cordon. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 21: 1276–1282.Google Scholar
  52. Noble, R. L., 1970. Evaluation of the Miller high-speed sampler for sampling yellow perch and walleye fry. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 27: 1033–1044.Google Scholar
  53. Nowicki, M., 1868. Sprawozdanie Komisji fizjograficznej. (orig. not seen, in Nowicki 1889).Google Scholar
  54. Nowicki, M.,1889. O rybach dorzeczy Wisly, Styru, Dniestru i Prutu w Galicyi. Drukarnia “Czasu” Fr. Kluczyckiego I Sp., Kraków, Poland. 54 pp.Google Scholar
  55. Pelletier, J., 1982. Types et zones d'écoulement des eaux dans les plaines et collines de la région de Morestel, Brégnier-Cordon. Revue Géograph. Lyon. 57: 3–38.Google Scholar
  56. Peňáz, M. & M. Prokes, 1973. Response of the chub, Leuciscus cephalus, in a homogeneous field of continuous and interrupted D.C. Zool. Listy. 22: 265–282.Google Scholar
  57. Peňáz, M., M. Prokeš & E. Wohlgemuth, 1978. Fish fry community of the Jihlava River. Acta Sci. Nat. Brno. 12: 1–36.Google Scholar
  58. Peňáz, M., E. Wohlgemuth, J. Hamáčková & J. Kouřil, 1982. Early ontogeny of the tench, Tinca tinca, II. Larval period. Folia Zool. 31: 175–180.Google Scholar
  59. Persat, H., A. Nelva & D. Chessel, 1985. Approche par l'analyse discriminante sur variables qualitatives d'un milieu lotique, le Haut-Rhône français. Oecol. Gener. 6: 365–381.Google Scholar
  60. Pianka, E. R., 1970. On r- and K-selection. Am. Nat. 104: 592–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Prokeš, M. & M. Peňáz, 1978. The course of spawning, early development and longitudinal growth of the nase carp, Chondrostoma nasus, in the Rokytna and Jihlava Rivers. Folia Zool. 27: 269–278.Google Scholar
  62. Prokes, M. & M. Peňáz, 1979. Reproduction and early development of the gudgeon, Gobio gobio. II. Larval and juvenile periods. Folia Zool. 28: 55–64.Google Scholar
  63. Prokeš, M. & M. Peňáz, 1980. Early development of the chub, Leuciscus cephalus. Acta Sci. Nat. Brno 14: 1–40.Google Scholar
  64. Reynolds, J. B., 1983. Electrofishing. In L. A. Nielsen & D. L. Johnson (eds) Fisheries techniques. Am. Fish. Soc. Bethesda, Maryland. pp. 147–163.Google Scholar
  65. Richardot-Coulet, M., C. Amoros, J. L. Reygrobellet & A. L. Roux, 1982. Diagnose des ensembles fonctionnels aquatiques définis sur le Haut-Rhône français. Application à une cartographie écologique dun système fluvial. Eau du Québec 15: 146–153.Google Scholar
  66. Rostan, J.-C., C. Amoros & J. Juget, 1987. The organic content of the surficial sediment: a method for the study of ecosystem development in abandoned river channels. Hydrobiologia (in press).Google Scholar
  67. Rousseau, B., A. Nelva, H. Persat & D. Chessel, 1985. Constitution d'un base de données ichtyolotiques par l'échantillonnage ponctuel d'abondance: application aux peuplements du Haut-Rhône français. Cybium 9: 157–173.Google Scholar
  68. Roux, A. L., 1976. Struncture et fonctionnement des écosystèmes de Haut-Rhône français I. Présentation de létude. Bull. Ecol. 7: 475–478.Google Scholar
  69. Roux, A. L., C. Amoros, M. Richardot-Coulet, J. L. Reygrobellet, G. Pautou & J.-P. Bravard, 1982. Cartographie pomythématique appliquée à la gestion écologique des eaux. CNRS, Paris. ISBN 2.222.0.2956–2. 113 pp.Google Scholar
  70. Schlosser, I.J., 1982. Fish community structure and function along two habitat gradients in a head water stream. Ecol. Monogr. 52: 359–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sheaffer, W. A. & J. G. Nickum, 1986. Backwater areas as nursery habitats for fishes in Pool 13 of the Upper Mississippi River. Hydrobiologia 136: 131–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Snyder, D. E., 1976. Terminologies for intervals of larval fish development. In J. Borman (ed) Great Lakes fish egg and larvae identification. USFWS, OBS FWS/OBS, Nat. Power Plant Team. Ann Arbor, Mich. pp. 41–58.Google Scholar
  73. Spillmann, C. J., 1961. Poissons d'eau douce. Faune de France, Editions Paul Lechevalier, 12, rue de Tournon, 75006 Paris. 303 pp.Google Scholar
  74. Spillmann, C. J., 1967. Sur l'identité specifique des poissonschats importés d'Amérique de Nord et répandus actuellement sur les eaux douces françaises. Bull. Mus. natn. Hist. Nat. Paris. 39: 288–292.Google Scholar
  75. Stankovitch, S., 1921. Etude sur la morphologie et la nutrition des alevins de poissons cyprinides. Thèse Doctorat d'Etat. Grenoble, France. 182 pp.Google Scholar
  76. Sternin, V. G. & Yu. K. Bumeister, 1972. Effect of various factors in the behaviour of fish in an electric field of current. In V. G. Sternin, I. V. Nikonorov and Yu. K. Bumeister (eds) Electrical fishing. Pishchevaya Promyshlennost, Moscow. (Isr. Prog. Sci. Translations) pp. 167–190.Google Scholar
  77. Thiero Yatabary, N. K., 1981. Etude de quelques aspects du regime alimentaire et de la croissance de deux poissons Siluroidei: Ictalurus melas (Rafinesque, 1820) dans une lône du Rhône; Synodontis schall (Bloch-Schneider, 1801) dans le Delta Central du fleuve Niger. Thèse de 3eme cycle, Université C. Bernard, Lyon I, France. 277 pp.Google Scholar
  78. Vibert, R., (ed.) 1967. Fishing with electricity, its application to biology and management. FAO, Fishing News (Books) Ltd. Surry, England. 276 pp.Google Scholar
  79. Welcomme, R. L., 1985. River fisheries. FAO Tech. paper N° 262. FAO, 00100 Rome. 303 pp.Google Scholar
  80. Witkowski, A., 1984a. Analiza ichtiofauny basenu Biebrzy. Czesc II. Materialy do znajomosci rybostanu i przeglad gatunków. (English summary) Fragm. faun. 28: 137–184.Google Scholar
  81. Witkowski, A., 1984b. Structure of communities and biomass of ichthyofauna in the Biebrza River, its old river beds and aflluents. Pol. Ecol. Stud. 10: 447–474.Google Scholar
  82. Zalewski, M. & R. L. Naiman, 1985. The regulation of riverine fish communities by a continuum of abiotic-biotic factors. In J. S. Alabaster (ed) Habitat modification and freshwater fisheries. Butterworths, London. pp. 1–9.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gordon H. Copp
    • 1
  • Milan Peňáz
    • 3
  1. 1.Laboratoire d'Ecologie des Eaux Douces, UA CNRS 367Université C. BernardVilleurbanne, CédexFrance
  2. 2.Eastern Rivers Group, FBA, c/o Regional Fisheries LaboratoryHuntingdonUK
  3. 3.Institute of Ecological and Systemical BiologyCzechoslovak Academy of SciencesKvětná 8Czechoslovakia

Personalised recommendations