Hydrobiologia

, Volume 224, Issue 2, pp 117–127 | Cite as

Effects of Tebuthiuron on aquatic productivity

  • Alan J. Temple
  • Brian R. Murphy
  • Edward F. Cheslak
Article
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:

Abstract

Tebuthiuron (N-[5-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl]-N,N′-dimethylurea) appears to control the riparian shrub saltcedar (Tamarix spp.); however, its use is restricted since the fate and effects of this herbicide in aquatic systems are unknown. Possible tebuthiuron impacts on aquatic production were examined in ten 2846-1 three-phase, open-system mesocosms. Each mesocosm contained sediment, water, algae, micro- and macroinvertebrates and fish, and was open to the atmosphere for gas exchange and colonization by indigenous macroinvertebrates and algae. The following nominal doses of tebuthiuron were used: 0 (control), 10, 70, 200, 500, and 1000 μg 1−1. The 200 μg 1−1 dose approximated the highest concentration of tebuthiuron detected in a water body after experimental application to a watershed. Data generated from all treatment levels were used in tebuthiuron fate analysis and in correlation analysis between the mesocosm variables. The control and the 200 μg 1−1 treatment level were replicated (n = 3) to allow for additional statistical analyses of treatment effects at the 200 μg 1−1 level. The adsorption of tebuthiuron to sediments contained in ten mesocosms was described by the Freundlich equation, x/m = 3.24c0.68. Phytoplankton primary production, chironomid density, and chironomid biomass were negatively correlated with tebuthiuron concentration during peak system productivity. Conversely, no trends were observed at any sample date between an omnivorous fish species and herbicide concentration. At the 200 μg 1−1 dose level, only chironomid density was reduced. Factors responsible for reductions in chironomid density may include 1) a species shift in the 200 μg 1−1 treatment algal assemblages toward a greater percentage of ‘unpalatable’ biomass, and 2) decreased algal productivity and/or an algal species shift in mesocosms receiving dose levels greater than 200 μg 1−1. Chironomid density reduction at the 200 μg 1−1 dose level suggests that deleterious effects may occur in some stream systems exposed to a 200 μg 1−1 tebuthiuron concentration.

Key words

tebuthiuron aquatic toxicology mesocosms 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bowling, J. W., J. P. Giesy, H. J. Kania & R. L. Knight, 1980. Large-scale microcosms for assessing fates and effects of trace contaminants. In J. P. Giesy (ed.), Microcosms in ecological research, U.S. Dept. of Energy, Washington, D.C., DOE Symposium Series 52: 244–247.Google Scholar
  2. Busby, F. E. Jr. & J. L. Schuster, 1973. Woody phreatophytes along the Brazos River and selected tributaries above Possum Kingdom Lake. Report 168, Texas Water Development Board, Austin (TX), 41 pp.Google Scholar
  3. Canton, S. P. & J. W. Chadwick, 1983. Aquatic insect communities of natural and artificial substrates in a montane stream. J. Freshwat. Ecol. 2: 153–158.Google Scholar
  4. Carpenter, S. R., J. F. Kitchell & J. R. Hodgson, 1985. Cascading trophic interaction and lake productivity. Bioscience 35: 634–639.Google Scholar
  5. Coffman, W. P., 1978. Chironomidae. In R. W. Merritt & K. W. Cummins (eds), An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque (IA): 345–176.Google Scholar
  6. Couch, R. W. & E. N. Nelson, 1982. Effects of 2,4 D on non-target species in Kerr Reservoir. J. aquat Plant Mgmt 20: 8–13.Google Scholar
  7. Dill, L. M., 1983. Adaptive flexibility in the foraging behavior of fishes. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 40: 398–408.Google Scholar
  8. Elanco Products Company, 1982. Transport of tebuthiuron in the environment: a position paper. Elanco Products Company, Indianapolis (IN), 7 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Elanco Products Company, 1983. Graslan Technical Manual. Elanco Products Company, Indianapolis (IN), 179 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Ferens, M. C. & R. J. Beyers, 1972. Studies of a simple laboratory microecosystem; effects of stress. Ecology 53: 709–713.Google Scholar
  11. Giddings, J. M. & G. K. Eddlemon, 1979. Some ecological and experimental properties of complex aquatic microcosms. Int. J. Envir. Stud. 13: 119–123.Google Scholar
  12. Goodyear, C. P., C. E. Boyd & R. J. Beyers, 1972. Relationships between primary productivity and mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis) production in large microcosms. Limnol. Oceanogr. 17: 445–450.Google Scholar
  13. Hall, D. J., W. E. Cooper & E. E. Werner, 1970. An experimental approach to the production dynamics and structure of freshwater animal communities. Limnol. Oceanogr. 15: 839–928.Google Scholar
  14. Hester, F. E. & J. B. Dendy, 1962. A multiple-plot sampler for aquatic macroinvertebrates. Trans. am. Fish. Soc. 91: 240.Google Scholar
  15. Hyra, R., 1978. Methods for assessing instream flows for recreation. Instream Flow Information Paper No. 6, FWS/OBS - 78/34. Cooperative Instream Flow Service Group, Ford Collins (CO), 52 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Johnson, R. R., 1978. The Lower Colorado River: a western system. Proceedings, Strategies for protection and management of floodplain wetlands and other riparian ecosystems. U.S. Dept. Agriculture-Forest Service, Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-12, U.S. Forest Service, Washington, (D.C.): 41–45.Google Scholar
  17. Jones, V. E., C. H. Meadors, P. W. Jacoby & C. E. Fisher, 1978. Effect of pelleted herbicides on six hard to control brush species. Proceedings, Southern Weed Sci. Soc. 31st Annual Meeting, 31: 191–192.Google Scholar
  18. Larner, D. C., R. M. Marshall, A. E. Pfluger & S. C. Burnitt, 1974. Woody phreatophytes along the Colorado River from southeast Runnels County to the headwaters in Borden County, Texas. Report 182, Texas Water Development Board Report, Austin (TX), 19 pp.Google Scholar
  19. Lee, D. S., C. R. Gilbert, C. H. Hocutt, R. E. Jenkins, D. E. McAllister & J. R. Stauffer, Jr., 1980. Atlas of North American freshwater fishes. North Carolina Biological Survey, Raleigh (NC), 854 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Lind, O. T., 1979. Handbook of common methods in limnology. The C.V. Mosby Company, St. Louis (MO), 199 pp.Google Scholar
  21. Loh, A., S. D. West & T. D. Macy, 1978. Gas chromatographic analysis of tebuthiuron and its metabolites in grass, sugarcane, and sugarcane by-products. J. agric. Food Chem. 26: 410–413.Google Scholar
  22. McConnell, W. J., 1965. Relationship of herbivore growth to rate of gross photosynthesis in microcosms. Limnol. Oceanogr. 10: 539–543.Google Scholar
  23. Meier, P. G., D. L. Penrose & L. Polak, 1979. The rate of colonization by macroinvertebrates on artificial substrate samplers. Freshwat. Biol. 9: 381–392.Google Scholar
  24. Moly, M. & E. Ruber, 1983. Effects of pesticides on pure and mixed species cultures of salt marsh pool algae. Bull. envir. Contam. Toxicol. 30: 464–472.Google Scholar
  25. Morton, D. M. & D. G. Hoffman, 1976. Metabolism of a new herbicide, Tebuthiuron {1-[5-(1,1-Dimethylethyl)-1,3,4Thiadiazol-2-yl]-1,3-Dimethylurea], in mouse, rat, rabbit, dog, ducks, and fish. J. Toxicol. envir. Health 1: 757–768.Google Scholar
  26. Murdoch, W. W., S. Avery & M. E. B. Smyth, 1975. Switching in predatory fish. Ecology 56: 1094–1105.Google Scholar
  27. Peck, O. E., D. L. Corwin & W. J. Farmer, 1980. Adsorption — desorption of tebuthiuron by freshwater sediments. J. envir. Qual. 9: 101–106.Google Scholar
  28. Pilson, M. E. Q. & S. W. Nixon, 1980. Marine microcosms in ecological research. In J. P. Giesy (ed.), Microcosms in ecological research, U.S. Dept. of Energy, Washington, D.C., DOE Symposium Series 52: 724–741.Google Scholar
  29. Pflieger, W. L., 1975. The fishes of Missouri. Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City (MO), 343 pp.Google Scholar
  30. Price, D. J., B. R. Murphy & L. M. Smith, 1989. Effects of tebuthiuron on characteristic green algae found in playa lakes. J. envir. Qual. 18: 62–66.Google Scholar
  31. Ryther, J. H., 1970. Is the world's oxygen supply threatened? Nature 227: 374–375.Google Scholar
  32. Saether, O. A., 1980. The influence of eutrophication on deep lake benthic invertebrate communities. Prog. Water Techol. 12: 161–180.Google Scholar
  33. Sheldon, A. L., 1977. Colonization curves: application to stream insects on seminatural substrates. Oikos 28: 256–261.Google Scholar
  34. Smith, H. N. & C. A. Rechenthin, 1964. Grasslands restoration: the Texas brush problem. U.S. Dept. of Agric. Soil Conser. Serv., Temple (TX).Google Scholar
  35. U.S. Dept. of Interior (USDI), 1959. Report on phreatophytes, for Senate Select Committee on Natural Water Resources. Dept. of Int., Washington (D.C.): 1–5.Google Scholar
  36. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), 1979. Water resources data for Texas. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Data Report TX-79–2. Austin (TX).Google Scholar
  37. Vollenweider, R. A., 1974. A manual on methods for measuring primary production in aquatic environments. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 225 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alan J. Temple
    • 1
  • Brian R. Murphy
    • 1
  • Edward F. Cheslak
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Range and Wildlife ManagementTexas Tech UniversityLubbockUSA
  2. 2.Department of Wildlife and Fisheries SciencesTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations