Hydrobiologia

, Volume 134, Issue 2, pp 141–149

Biotests with phytoplankton assemblages. Growth limitation along temporal and spatial gradients

  • Øivind Løvstad
Article

Abstract

The development of eight different species (populations) along temporal and vertical gradients in several lakes was studied. Many populations had an exponential growth phase and a decline phase. The growth rate was often high during the exponential phase. Some species, e.g. Oscillatoria spp. and Synedra cf. acus, often also had a long stationary phase. The growth rate and the sinking rate of these populations were often very low.

Laboratory batch experiments with dilute phytoplankton populations were carried out to estimate the degree of growth limitation (L) for different populations sample from different lakes during the three growth phases. L was always low and often zero for populations initially in the exponential phase and always high for populations initially in the decline phase. The biotests also gave results that can help to explain the vertical distribution of Oscillatoria or Asterionella in three lakes investigated.

The results indicate that the growth rates and the development of the populations were dependent on the external chemical and physical conditions. The transition between the different growth phases seemed often to be dependent on the external nutrient conditions. P, N, Si and Fe were probably the most growth-limiting nutrients. The growth rate of some diatoms was probably limited directly or indirectly at high pH.

Laboratory biotests with natural populations may give valuable information on the growth-properties of different populations in the lakes. The biotests should, however, be carried out in combination with chemical and physical measurements and quantitative determinations of population densities.

Keywords

lakes phytoplankton populations bioassays growth limitation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahlgren, G., 1980. Effects on algal growth rates by multiple nutrient limitation. Arch. Hydrobiol. 89: 43–53.Google Scholar
  2. Barlow, J. P., W. R. Schaffner, F. deNoyelles & B. J. Peterson, 1973. Continuous flow nutrient bioassays with natural phytoplankton populations. In Glass, G. E. (ed.). Bioassay Techniques and Environmental Chemistry.. Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, Mich.: 229–319.Google Scholar
  3. Cescon, B. S. & P. G. Scarazzato, 1973. Determonation of low phosphate concentrations in seawater by an isobutyl acetate extraction procedure. Limnol. Oceanogr. 18: 499–500.Google Scholar
  4. deNoyelles, F. Jr. & W. J. O'Brien, 1978. Phytoplankton succession in nutrient enriched experimental ponds as related to changing carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus conditions. Arch. Hydrobiol. 84: 137–165.Google Scholar
  5. deNoyelles, F. Jr., R. Knoechel, D. Reinke, D. Treanor & C. Altenhofen, 1980. Continuous culturing of natural phytoplankton communities in The Experimental Lake Area: effects of enclosure, in situ incubation, light, phosphorus and cadmium. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 37: 424–433.Google Scholar
  6. Droop, M. R., 1968. Vitamin B12 and marine ecology IV. The kinetics of uptake, growth and inhibition in Monochrysis lutheri. J. mar. Biol. Ass. UK 48: 689–733.Google Scholar
  7. Droop, M. R., 1973. Some thoughts on nutrient limitation in algae. J. Phycol. 9: 264–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Droop, M. R., 1974. The nutrient status of algal cells in continuous culture. J. mar. Biol. Ass. UK 54: 825–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gerhart, D. Z. & G. E. Likens, 1975. Enrichment experiments for determining nutrient limitation. Four methods compared. Limnol. Oceanogr. 20: 649–653.Google Scholar
  10. Goldman, C. R., 1978. The use of phytoplankton populations in bioassays. Mitt. int. Ver. Limnol. 21: 364–371.Google Scholar
  11. Golterman, H. L., 1969. Methods for Chemical Analysis of Fresh Waters. IBP Handbook 8. Blackwell Publications, Oxford, 166 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Guillard, R. R. L. & C. J. Lorenzen, 1972. Yellow-green algae with chlorophyllide c. J. Phycol. 8: 10–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harris, G. P., 1980. Temporal and spatial scales in phytoplankton ecology. Mechanisms, methods, models and management. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 37: 877–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Healey, F. P., 1979. Short-term responses of nutrient-deficient algae to nutrient addition. J. Phycol. 15: 289–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Holm, N. P. & D. E. Armstrong, 1981. Role of nutrient limitation and competition in controlling the population of Asterionella formosa and Microcystis aeruginosa in semicontinuous culture. Limnol. Oceanogr. 26: 622–634.Google Scholar
  16. Jannasch, H. W., 1974. Steady state and the chemostat in ecology. Limnol. Oceanogr. 19: 716–720.Google Scholar
  17. Jones, K. J., P. Tett, A. S. Wallis & B. J. B. Wood, 1978. Investigation of a nutrient-growth model using a continuous culture of natural phytoplankton. J. mar. Biol. Ass. UK 58: 923–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kilham, S. S., 1975. Kinetics of silicon-limited growth in fresh-water diatom Asterionella formosa. J. Phycol. 11: 396–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Klaveness, D., 1977. Morphology, distribution and significance of the manganese-accumulating microorganism Metallogenium in lakes. Hydrobiologia 56: 25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Løvstad, Ø., 1983. Determination of growth-limiting nutrients for red species of Oscillatoria and two ‘oligotrophic’ diatoms. Hydrobiologia 107: 221–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Løvstad, Ø., 1984a. Competitive ability of laboratory batch phytoplankton populations at limiting nutrient levels. OIKOS 42: 176–184.Google Scholar
  22. Løvstad, Ø., 1984b. Determination of growth-limiting factors for Oscillatoria agardhii Gom. and diatoms in eutrophic lakes. OIKOS 42: 185–192.Google Scholar
  23. Løvstad, Ø. & T. Wold, 1984. Determination of external concentrations of available phosphorus for phytoplankton populations. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 22: 205–210.Google Scholar
  24. Monod, J., 1950. La technique de culture continue: theorie et applications. Ann. Inst. Pasteur. 79: 390–410.Google Scholar
  25. Moss, B., 1969. Limitation of algal growth in some central African waters. Limnol. Oceanogr. 14: 591–601.Google Scholar
  26. Peterson, B. J., J. P. Barlow & A. Savage, 1974. The physiological state with respect to phosphorus of Cayuga Lake phytoplankton. Limnol. Oceanogr. 19: 396–408.Google Scholar
  27. Rhee, G-Y., 1974. Phosphate uptake under nitrate limitation by Scenedesmus sp. and its ecological implications. J. Phycol. 10: 470–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rhee, G-F. & I. J. Gotham, 1980. Optimum N:P ratios and coexistence of planktonic algae. J. Phycol. 16: 486–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rhee, G-Y. & I. J. Gotham, 1981a. The effect of environmental factors on phytoplankton growth: Temperature and the interactions of temperature with nutrient limitation. Limnol. Oceanogr. 26: 635–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rhee, G-Y. & I. J. Gotham, 1981b. The effect of environmental factors on phytoplankton growth: Light and the interactions of light and nitrate limitation. Limnol. Oceanogr. 26: 649–659.Google Scholar
  31. Ryther, J. H. & R. R. L. Guillard, 1959. Enrichment experiments as a means of studying nutrients limiting to phytoplankton production. Deep-Sea Res. 6: 65–69.Google Scholar
  32. Schelske, C. L., E. D. Rotman, E. F. Stoermer & M. A. Santiago, 1974. Responses of phosphorus limited Lake Michigan phytoplankton to factorial enrichments with nitrogen and phosphorus. Limnol. Oceanogr. 19: 409–419.Google Scholar
  33. Tilman, D., 1977. Resource competition between planktonic algae: an experimental and a theoretical approach. Ecology 58: 338–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tilman, D. & S. S. Kilham, 1976. Phosphate and silicate growth and uptake kinetics of the diatoms Asterionella formosa and Cyclotella meneghiniana in batch and semicontinuous culture. J. Phycol. 12: 375–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Utermöhl, H., 1958. Zur Vervollkommung der quantitativen Phytoplanktonmethodik. Mitt. int. Ver. Limnol. 9: 1–38.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr W. Junk Publishers 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Øivind Løvstad
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of LimnologyUniversity of OsloN-OsloNorway

Personalised recommendations