Advertisement

Hydrobiologia

, Volume 135, Issue 1–2, pp 155–165 | Cite as

Structure, zonation, and species diversity of the mayfly communities of the Belá River basin, Slovakia

  • Pavel Deván
  • Ladislav Mucinaz
Article

Abstract

Four mayfly taxocoena which correspond to zones in the river continuum concept of Vannote et al. (1980) and to the zonation concept of Illies & Botoşaneanu (1963), were distinguished by cluster analysis in the Belá River basin, Slovakia.

By principal components analysis, taxocoena were shown to be separated along a complex gradient dominated by altitude and slope.

An increase of species diversity was observed downstreams. The species-diversity data can be fitted to a geometric series, and interpreted by the niche preemption hypothesis. Equitability and the ratio of Baetidae to Heptagenidae are supposed to indicate ecological conditions.

Keywords

cluster analysis Ephemeroptera ordination Slovakia species diversity taxocoenon zonation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allan, J. D., 1975. The distributional ecology and diversity of benthic insects in Cement Creek, Colorado. Ecology 56: 1040–1053.Google Scholar
  2. Culp, J. M. & R. W. Davies, 1982. Analysis of longitudinal zonation and the river continuum concept in the Oldman — South Saskatchewan River system. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 39: 1255–1266.Google Scholar
  3. Dargie, J. D., 1984. On the integrated interpretation of indirect site ordinations: a case study using semi-arid vegetation in southeastern Spain. Vegetatio 55: 37–55.Google Scholar
  4. Deván, P., 1980. Mayflies (Ephemeroptera) of the river Belá Western Tatra Mts. and its important tributaries. Thesis, Bratislava, 80 pp. (in Slov.)Google Scholar
  5. Deván, P., 1982. Podenky (Ephemeroptera) rieky Belej (Západné Tatry a jej pritokov. Zborn. Prác TANAP 23: 187–192.Google Scholar
  6. Deván, P., 1984. Ephemeroptera des Flusses Belá. Prace Lab. Rybár. Hydrobiol., Bratislava 4: 119–158.Google Scholar
  7. Dodds, G. S. & F. L. Hisaw, 1925. Ecological studies on aquatic insects, 4. Altitudinal range and zonation of mayflies, stoneflies and caddisflies in the Colorado Rockies. Ecology 6: 380–390.Google Scholar
  8. Goldstein, R. & D. F. Grigal, 1972. Computer programs for the ordination and classification of ecosystems. Ecol. scient. Div. Publ. Oak Ridge Nat. Lab. 17: 69–90.Google Scholar
  9. Gore, J. A., 1978. A technique for predicting in-stream flow requirements of benthic macroinvertebrates. Freshwat. Biol. 8: 141–151.Google Scholar
  10. Hart, D. D., 1983. The importance of competitive interactions within stream populations and communities. In J. R. Barnes & G. W. Minshall (eds), Stream Ecology. Plenum Press, N.Y., Lond.: 99–136.Google Scholar
  11. Hynes, H. B. N., 1970. The Ecology of Running Waters. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 555 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Ide, F. P., 1935. The effect of temperature on the distribution of the mayfly fauna of a stream. Publ. Ont. Fish. Res. 50: 1–76.Google Scholar
  13. Illies, J., 1978. Limnofauna Europaea, 2nd Edn. Gustav Fisher Verlag, Stuttgart, N.Y., 532 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Illies, J. & L. Botoşaneanu, 1963. Problème et méthodes de la classification et de zonation écologique des eaux courantes, considerées surtout du point de vue faunistique. Mitt. int. Ver. theor. angew. Limnol. Verh. 12: 1–57.Google Scholar
  15. Kamler, E., 1965. Thermal conditions in mountain waters and their influence on the distribution of Plecoptera and Ephemeroptera larvae. Ekol. pol. 13 A: 377–414.Google Scholar
  16. Kamler, E., 1967. Distribution of Plecoptera and Ephemeroptera larvae in relation to altitude above mean sea level and current speed in mountain waters. Pol. Arch. Hydrobiol. 14: 29–42.Google Scholar
  17. Kawecka, B., M. Kownacka & A. Kownacki, 1971. General characteristics of the biocenosis in the streams of the Polish High Tatras. Acta Hydrobiol. 13: 465–476.Google Scholar
  18. King, J. M., 1981. The distribution of invertebrate communities in a small South African river. Hydrobiologia 83: 43–65.Google Scholar
  19. King, J. M., 1983. Abundance, biomass and diversity of benthic macro-invertebrates in a western Cape River, South Africa. Trans. r. Soc. S. Afr. 45: 11–34.Google Scholar
  20. Kownacki, M., 1970. The bottom fauna of the stream Sucha Woda (High Tatra Mts.) in the annual cycle. Acta Hydrobiol. 13: 415–438.Google Scholar
  21. Kownacki, A., 1971. Taxocenes of Chironomidae in streams of the Polish High Tatra Mts. Acta Hydrobiol. 13: 439–463.Google Scholar
  22. Krno, I., 1978. The zoobenthos of the Revúca River and its tributaries. Biol. Prace, Bratislava, 24(2): 63–120. (in Slov. with Engl. Summ.).Google Scholar
  23. Krno, L, 1982. The structure and dynamics of the macrozoobenthos of the Ľupčianka river and its tributaries (the Nizke Tatry Mts.). Biol. Prace, Bratislava, 28(2): 1–126. (in Slov. with Engl. Summ.).Google Scholar
  24. Kuusela, K., 1979. Early summer ecology and community structure of the macrozoobenthos on stones in the Jäväjänkoski rapids on the river Lestijoki, Finland. Acta Univ. Oulensis, Ser. Biol. 6: 9–123.Google Scholar
  25. Landa, V., 1969. Fauna ČSSR 18. Jepice — Ephemeroptera. Academia, Praha, 347 pp. (in Czech with Engl. Summ.).Google Scholar
  26. Maarel, E. van der, 1980. On the interpretability of ordination diagrams. Vegetatio 42: 43–45.Google Scholar
  27. March, B. G. E., de, 1976. Spatial and temporal patterns in macrobenthic stream diversity. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 33: 1261–1270.Google Scholar
  28. McAucliffe, J. R., 1983. Competition, colonization patterns, and disturbance in stream benthic communities. In J. R. Barnes & G. W. Minshall (eds), Stream Ecology. Plenum Press, N.Y., Lond.: 137–155.Google Scholar
  29. McNaughton, S. J. & L. L. Wolf, 1973. General Ecology. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, N.Y., Chicago, San Fransico, Atlanta, Dallas, Montreal, Toronto, London, Sydney, 710 pp.Google Scholar
  30. Müller-Liebenau, I., 1969. Revision der europäische Arten der Gattung Baetis Leach, 1815 (Insecta, Ephemeroptera). Gewäss. Abwäss. 48/49: 1–214.Google Scholar
  31. Nichols, S., 1977. On the interpretation of principal components analysis in ecological contexts. Vegetatio 34: 191–197.Google Scholar
  32. Noy-Meir, I. & R. H. Whittaker, 1977. Continuous multivariate methods in community analysis: some problems and developments. Vegetatio 33: 79–98.Google Scholar
  33. Odum, E. P., 1971. Fundamentals of Ecology. 3rd Edn. W. B. Saunders & Co., Philad., Lond., Toronto, 574 pp.Google Scholar
  34. Orlóci, L., 1967. An agglomerative method for classification of plant communities. J. Ecol. 55: 193–205.Google Scholar
  35. Orlóci, L., 1978. Multivariate Analysis in Vegetation Research. 2nd Edn. Dr W. Junk bv. Publishers, The Hague, 451 pp.Google Scholar
  36. Osborne, L. L., R. W., Davies & R. J. Linton, 1980. Use of hierarchical diversity indices in lotic community analysis. J. appl. Ecol. 17: 567–580Google Scholar
  37. Peňáz, M., 1966. Contribution towards the knowledge of the biomass in the Svratka River above and below the Vir river dam basin. Zool. Listy, Brno, 15: 361–372.Google Scholar
  38. Pielou, E. C., 1966. The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. J. theor. Biol. 13: 131–144.Google Scholar
  39. Pielou, E. C., 1977. Mathematical Ecology. John Wiley & Sons, N.Y., Chichester, Brisbane, Toronto, 385 pp.Google Scholar
  40. Sowa, R., 1970. Sur la taxonomie de Rhithrogena semicolorata (Curtis) et de quelques espèces voisines d'Europe continentale (Ephemeroptera: Heptagenidae). Revue suisse Zool. 77: 895–920.Google Scholar
  41. Sowa, R., 1971. Ecdyonurus starmachii sp. n. et E. submontanus Landa des Carpates polonaises (Ephemeroptera: Heptagenidae). Bull. Acad. Pol. Sci. 19: 407–412.Google Scholar
  42. Sowa, R., 1973a. Taxonomie et écologie de Caenis beskidensis sp. n. des Carpates polonaises (Ephemeroptera: Caenidae). Bull. Acad. Pol. Sci. 21: 351–355.Google Scholar
  43. Sowa, R., 1973b. Taxonomie et écologie d' Ecdyonurus carpaticus sp. n. des Carpates polonaises (Ephemeroptera: Heptagenidae). Bull. Acad. Pol. Sci. 21: 285–289.Google Scholar
  44. Sowa, R., 1974. Ecdyonurus fascioculatus sp. n. d'espéce voisine d'E. affinis Eaton du midi de la Pologne (Ephemeroptera: Heptagenidae). Bull. Acad. Pol. Sci. 22: 315–329.Google Scholar
  45. Sowa, R., 1975. Ecology and biogeography of mayflies (Ephemeroptera) of running waters in the Polish part of the Carpathians, 1. Distribution and quantitative aspects. Acta Hydrobiol. 17: 223–297.Google Scholar
  46. Vannote, R. L., G. W. Minshall, K. W. Cummins, J. R. Sedell & C. E. Cushing, 1980. The river continuum concept. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 37: 130–137.Google Scholar
  47. Ward, J. V., 1981. Altitudinal distribution and abundance of Trichoptera in a Rocky Mountain stream. In G. P. Moretti (ed.), Proc. 3rd. int. Symp. Trichoptera, Ser. Ent. Dr W. Junk b.v. Publishers, The Hague: 375–381.Google Scholar
  48. Ward, J. V., 1982. Altitudinal zonation of Plecoptera in a Rocky Mountain stream. Aquat. Insects 4: 105–110.Google Scholar
  49. Ward, J. V. & L. Berner, 1980. Abundance and altitudinal distribution of Ephemeroptera in a Rocky Mountain stream. In J. F. Flannagan & K. E. Marshall (eds), Advances in Ephemeroptera Biology. Plenum Press, N.Y., Lond.: 169–177.Google Scholar
  50. Whittaker, R. H., 1965. Dominance and diversity in land communities. Science 147: 250–260.Google Scholar
  51. Whittaker, R. H., 1975. Communities and Ecosystems. 2nd Edn. Mac Millan, N.Y., 385 pp.Google Scholar
  52. Wishart, D., 1978. CLUSTAN 1C. User Manual. 3rd. Edn. St. Andrews Computing Centre, Lond., 175 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr W. Junk Publishers 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pavel Deván
    • 1
  • Ladislav Mucinaz
    • 2
  1. 1.TrenčínCzechoslovakia
  2. 2.Institute of Experimental Biology and Ecology, Slovak Academy of SciencesBratislavaCzechoslovakia

Personalised recommendations