Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 9–22 | Cite as

The influence of light on the twilight migrations of grunts

  • William N. McFarland
  • John C. Ogden
  • John N. Lythgoe


Behaviors that precede the daily migrations of mixed-species schools of juvenile grunts (Pomadasyidae), from patch reefs to grass beds at dusk and vice versa at dawn, are defined and utilized to ascertain the precision of the migrations. Although premigratory behaviors differ at dusk and dawn, the migrations are precise twilight events which occur at the same light intensities during dawn and dusk. Histological sections of the retina reveal that both cones and rods are fully exposed to ambient light during the migrations. Under the difficult photic conditions that prevail during migration, the retina is structured photomechanically to maximize the absorption of ambient light. Body colorations of the grunts, which consist mostly of intense colored stripes during the day, are replaced at night by cryptic melanic patterns. The precision of migration, the photomechanical movements in the retina, and the changes in body coloration are considered adaptive because they reduce predation on grunts when they migrate and are most vulnerable to attack. In support of this conclusion, the migrations take place just before the evening and just after the morning ‘quiet period’ - thus they avoid that period during twilight when predation is highest in tropical fish communities.


Fish migration Behavioral precision Behavior reversal Schooling Predation Retinal photomechanical movements Body color patterns Quiet period 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References cited

  1. Ali, M.A. 1959. The ocular structure, retinomotor and photobehavioral responses of juvenile Pacific salmon. Can. J. Zool. 37: 965–996.Google Scholar
  2. Ali, M.A. 1971. Les réponses réstro-motrices: caractères et méchanismes. Vision Res. 11: 1225–1288.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Fishelson, L., D. Popper & N. Gunderman. 1971. Diurnal cyclic behavior of Pempheris ovalensis (Pempheridae, Teleostei). J. Nat. Hist. 5: 503–506.Google Scholar
  4. Gladfelter, W. B. 1978. Twilight migrations and foraging activities of the copper sweeper, Pempheris schomburgki (Teleostei, Pempheridae). Mol. Biol. (In Press).Google Scholar
  5. Hobson, E.S. 1965. Diurnal-nocturnal activity of some inshore fishes in the Gulf of California. Copeia 3: 291–302.Google Scholar
  6. Hobson, E.S. 1968. Predatory behavior of some shore fishes in the Gulf of California. U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv., Res. Rep. 73: 1–92.Google Scholar
  7. Hobson, E.S. 1972. Activity of Hawaiian reef fishes during the evening and morning transitions between daylight and darkness. U.S. Fish. Bull. 70: 715–740.Google Scholar
  8. Hobson, E.S. 1973. Diel feeding migrations in tropical reef fishes. Helgoländer wiss. Meeresunters. 24: 361–370.Google Scholar
  9. Hobson, E.S. & J.R. Chess. 1973. Feeding oriented movements of the atherinid fish Pranesus pingus at Majuro Atoll, Marshall Islands. U.S. Fish. Bull. 71: 777–786.Google Scholar
  10. Hobson, E.S. & J.R. Chess. 1976. Trophic interactions among fishes and zooplankters near shore at Santa Catalina Island, California. U.S. Fish. Bull. 74: 567–598.Google Scholar
  11. Le Grand, Y. 1968. Light, Colour and Vision. Second Edition, English translation. Chapman and Hall, London. 564 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Major, P.F. 1977. Predator-prey interactions in schooling fishes during periods of twilight: a study of the silverside Pranesus insularum in Hawaii. U.S. Fish. Bull. 75: 415–426.Google Scholar
  13. McFarland, W. N. & F. W. Munz. 1976. The visible spectrum during twilight and its implications to vision. pp.249–270. In: G. C. Evans, R. Bainbridge & O. Rackham (ed.). Light as an Ecological Factor, Vol. II. Blackwell Sci. Publ., London.Google Scholar
  14. Morin, J.G. A.H. Harrington, K. Nealson, N. Krieger, T.O. Baldwin & J.W. Hasting. 1975. Light for all reasons: versatility in the behavioral repertoire of the flashlight fish. Science 190: 74–76.Google Scholar
  15. Munz, F.W. & W.N. McFarland. 1973. The significance of spectral position in the rhodopsins of tropical marine fishes. Vision Res. 13: 1829–1874.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ogden, J.C., R.A. Brown & N. Salesky. 1973. Grazing by the echinoid Diadema antillarum Philippi: formation of halos around West Indian patch reefs. Science 182: 715–717.Google Scholar
  17. Ogden, J.C. & N.S. Buckman. 1973. Movements, foraging groups and diurnal migrations of the striped parrotfish Scarus croicensis Block (Scaridae). Ecology 54: 589–596.Google Scholar
  18. Ogden, J.C. & P.R. Ehrlich. 1977. The behavior of heterotypic resting schools of juvenile grunts (Pomadasyidae). Mar. Biol. 42: 273–280.Google Scholar
  19. Ogden, J. C. & J. C. Zieman. 1977. Ecological aspects of coral reef-seagrass bed contacts in the Caribbean. pp. 378–382. In: Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. Coral Reefs (1, Biology).Google Scholar
  20. Starck, W.A. II & W.P. Davis. 1966. Night habits of fishes of Alligator Reef, Florida. Ichthyol. Aquarium J. 38: 313–356.Google Scholar
  21. Walls, G. L. 1942. The Vertebrate Eye and Its Adaptive Radiation. Reprinted 1963, Hafner Publ., New York. 785 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr. W. Junk b.v. Publishers 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • William N. McFarland
    • 1
  • John C. Ogden
    • 2
  • John N. Lythgoe
    • 3
  1. 1.Section of Ecology and SystematicsCornell UniversityIthacaU.S.A.
  2. 2.West Indies LaboratoryFairleigh Dickinson UniversityU.S. Virgin IslandsU.S.A.
  3. 3.Department of ZoologyUniversity of BristolBristolU.K.

Personalised recommendations