Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 47, Issue 2, pp 203–211

Ontogenetic dietary shifts and feeding behavior of the tiger shark, Galeocerdo cuvier, in Hawaiian waters

  • Christopher G. Lowe
  • Bradley M. Wetherbee
  • Gerald L. Crow
  • Albert L. Tester
Article

Synopsis

Stomach content data from 281 tiger sharks caught during shark control programs in Hawaii between 1967 and 1969, and during 1976 were analyzed to examine feeding habits and ontogenetic shifts in diet. As sharks increased in size, prey diversity and frequency of occurrence of large prey items increased. The percent occurrence of teleosts and cephalopods in stomachs decreased as sharks increased in length, while occurrence of elasmobranchs, turtles, land mammals, crustaceans, and undigestible items increased. Comparisons between the diets of tiger sharks from Hawaii and other locations indicate that ontogenetic shifts are universal in this species and that tiger sharks may be opportunistic feeders that prey heavily on abundant, easy to capture prey. Small tiger sharks may be spatially segregated from medium and large sharks and appear to be primarily nocturnal, bottom feeders. Large tiger sharks feed near the bottom at night, but also feed at the surface during the day. Prey, similar in size to humans, begin to occur in the diet of tiger sharks approximately 230 cm TL, and therefore sharks of this size and larger may pose the greatest threat to humans. Ontogenetic shifts in diet may be attributed to increased size of sharks, expanded range and exploitation of habitats of larger sharks, and/or improved hunting skill of larger sharks.

Key words

Dietary analysis Prey diversity Predatory behavior Elasmobranch 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References cited

  1. Branstetter, S., J.A. Musick & J.A. Colvocoresses. 1987. A comparison of the age and growth of the tiger shark, Galeocerdo cuvieri, from off Virginia and from the northwestern Gulf of Mexico. U.S. Fish. Bull. 85: 269–279.Google Scholar
  2. Bell, J.C. & J.T. Nichols. 1921. Notes on the food of Carolina sharks. Copeia 1921: 17–20.Google Scholar
  3. Cortés, & s.H. Gruber. 1990. Diet, feeding habits, and estimates of daily ration of young lemon sharks, Negaprion brevirostris. Copeai 1990: 204–218.Google Scholar
  4. De Crosta, M.A. 1984. Age determination, growth, and energetics of three species of carcharhinid sharks in Hawaii. MS Thesis, University of Hawaii, Honolulu. 66 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Gudger, E.W. 1949. Natural history notes on tiger sharks, (Galeocerdo tigrinus), caught at Key West, Florida, with emphasis on food and feeding habits. Copeia 1949: 39–47.Google Scholar
  6. Hobson, E.S. 1974. Feeding relationships of teleostean fishes on coral reefs in Kona, Hawaii. U.S. Fish. Bull. 72: 915–1031.Google Scholar
  7. Klimley, A.P. 1985. The areal distribution and autoecology of the white shark, Carcharodon carcharias, off the west coast of North America. Mem. S. Cal. Acad. Sci. 9: 15–40.Google Scholar
  8. Krebs, C.J. 1989. Ecological methods. Harper & Row Publishers, New York. 654 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Langton, R.S. 1982. Diet overlap between the Atlantic cod, Gadus morhua, silver hake, Merluccius bilinearis and fifteen other northwest Atlantic finfish. U.S. Fish. Bull. 80: 745–759.Google Scholar
  10. Medved, R.J., C.E. Stillwell & J.G. Casey. 1985. Stomach contents of young sandbar sharks, Carcharhinus plumbeus, in Chincoteague Bay, Virginia. U.S. Fish. Bull. 83: 395–402.Google Scholar
  11. McCosker, J.E. 1985. White shark attack behavior: observations of and speculations about predator and prey strategies. Mem. S. Cal. Acad. Sci. 9: 123–135.Google Scholar
  12. Morrissey, J.F. & S.H. Gruber. 1993. Home range of juvenile lemon sharks, Negaprion brevirostris. Copeia 1993: 425–434.Google Scholar
  13. Olsen, A.M. 1954. The biology, migration, and growth rate of the school shark, Galeorhinus australis (Maeleay) (Carcharhinidae) in south-eastern Australian waters. Aust. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 5: 353–410.Google Scholar
  14. Polovina, J.J. 1984. Model of a coral reef ecosystem. I. The ECOPATH model and its application to French Frigate Shoals. Coral Reefs 3: 1–11.Google Scholar
  15. Rancurel, P. & A. Intes. 1982. Le requin tigre, Galeocerdo cuvieri Lacépède, des eaux Néocalédoniennes examen des contenus stomacaux. Tethys 10: 195–199.Google Scholar
  16. Bandall. J.E. 1992. Review of the biology of the tiger shark (Galeocerdo cuvier). Aust. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 43: 21–31.Google Scholar
  17. Simpfendorfer, C. 1992. Biology of tiger sharks (Galeocerdo cuvier) caught by the Queensland shark meshing program off Townsville, Australia. Aust. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 43: 33–43.Google Scholar
  18. Springer, S. 1960. Natural history of the sandbar shark, Eulamnia milberti. U.S. Fish. Bull. 61: 1–38.Google Scholar
  19. Stillwell, C.E. & N.E. Kohler. 1982. Food, feeding habits, and estimates of daily ration of the shortfin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus) in the northwest Atlantic. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 39: 407–414.Google Scholar
  20. Talent, L.G. 1976. Food habits of the leopard shark, Triakis semi-fasciata, in Elkhorn Slough, Monterey Bay, California. Calif. Fish Game 62: 286–298.Google Scholar
  21. Tricas, T.C. & J.E. McCosker. 1984. Predatory behavior of the white shark, Carcharodon carcharias, with notes on its biology. Proc. Cal. Acad. Sci. 14: 221–238.Google Scholar
  22. Wetherbee, B.M., S.H. Gruber & E. Cortés. 1990. Diet, feeding habits, digestion, and consumption in sharks, with special reference to the lemon shark, Negaprion brevirostris. pp. 29–47. In: H.L. Pratt Jr., S.H. Gruber & T. Taniuchi (ed.) Elasmobranchs as living resouces: Advances in the biology, ecology, systematics, and the status of the fisheries, NOAA Tech. Rep. NNMFS 90.Google Scholar
  23. Wetherbee, B.M., C.G. Lowe & G.L. Crow. 1994. A review of shark control in Hawaii with recommendations for future research. Pac. Sci. 48: 95–115.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher G. Lowe
    • 1
  • Bradley M. Wetherbee
    • 1
  • Gerald L. Crow
    • 2
  • Albert L. Tester
    • 1
  1. 1.Hawaii Institute of Marine BiologyUniversity of Hawaii at ManoaKaneoheU.S.A.
  2. 2.Waikiki Aquarium, School of Ocean and Earth Science and TechnologyUniversity of Hawaii at ManoaHonoluluU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations