Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of siltation on stream fish communities

  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Synopsis

The effect of siltation on stream fish in northeast Missouri was evaluated using community structural measurements and a functional approach that emphasized feeding and reproductive guilds. As the percentage of fine substrate increased, the distinction among riffle, run, and pool communities decreased, primarily because the number of individuals of typical riffle species decreased. Within the riffle communities the abundance of fish of two feeding guilds — benthic insectivores and herbivores — was reduced as the percent of fine substrate increased. The abundance of fish in other feeding guilds was not affected. The only reproductive guild to be similarly affected was the simple and lithophilous, whose members require a clean gravel substrate for spawning. Species within each guild affected by siltation had significantly similar trends in abundance. The guild analysis indicated that species with similar ecological requirements had a common response to habitat degradation by siltation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aitken, W.W. 1936. The relation of soil erosion to stream improvement and fish life. J. For. 34: 1059–1061.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, K.R. 1969. Distinctive aspects of the ecology of stream fishes: a review. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 26: 1429–1438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balon, E.K. 1975. Reproductive guilds of fishes: a proposal and definition. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 32: 821–864.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breder, C.M. & D.E. Rosen. 1966. Modes of reproduction in fishes. Natural History Press, Garden City. 941 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusven, M.A. & K.V. Prather. 1974. Influence of stream sediments on distribution of macrobenthos. J. Entomol. Soc. B.C. 71: 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, J. Jr. & K.L. Dickson. 1980. The ABC's of biological monitoring. pp. 205–231. In: C.H. Hocutt & J.R. Stauffer, Jr.(ed.) Biological Monitoring of Fish, Lexington Books, Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chutter, F.M. 1969. The effects of silt and sand on the invertebrate fauna of streams and rivers. Hydrobiologia 34: 57–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordone, A.J. & D.W. Kelley. 1961. The influences of inorganic sediment on the aquatic life in streams. Calif. Fish Game 47: 189–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, F.B. 1967. Handbook of fishes of Kansas. Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas Miscellaneous Publication 45. 357 pp.

  • Culp, J.M. & R.W. Davies. 1980. Reciprocal averaging and polar ordination as techniques for analyzing lotic macroinvertebrate communities. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37: 1358–1364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, M.M. 1936. Erosion silt as a factor in aquatic environments. Ecology 17: 29–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenneman, N.M. 1938. Physiography of eastern United States. McGraw-Hill, New York. 714 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gammon, J.R. 1970. The effect of inorganic sediment on stream biota. U.S. Environ. Protection Agency, Water Pollution Cont. Res. Ser. 18050 DWC 12/70: 1–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch, H.G., Jr. 1982. Multivariate analysis in community ecology. Cambridge University Press, New York. 298 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch, H.G. Jr. & R.H. Whittaker. 1972. Comparison of ordination techniques. Ecology 53: 865–875.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, O.T. & J.R. Karr. 1978. Habitat structure and stream fish communities. Ecology 59: 507–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks, M.L., C.H. Hocutt & J.R. Stauffer, Jr. 1980. Monitoring of fish in lotic habitats. pp. 205–231. In: C.H. Hocutt & J.R. Stauffer, Jr.(ed.) Biological Monitoring of Fish, Lexington Books, Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M.O. 1972. Reciprocal averaging: an eigenvektor method of ordination. J. Ecology 61: 237–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M.O. 1979. DECORANA — A FORTRAN program for detrended correspondence analysis and reciprocal averaging. Section of Ecology and Systematics, Cornell University, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judy, R.D. Jr., P.N. Seeley, T.M. Murray, S.C. Svirsky, M.R. Whitworth & L.S. Ischinger. 1984. 1982 National Fisheries Survey. Volume I Technical Report: Initial findings. U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv., FWS/OBS-84/06. 140 pp.

  • Karr, J.R. 1981. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries (Bethesda) 6: 21–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J.R. & D.R. Dudley. 1981. Ecological perspective on water quality goals. Environ. Manage. 5: 55–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, T.H. 1941. Two processes operating for the reduction in abundance or elimination of fish species from certain types of water areas. Trans. North. Amer. Wildl. Conf. 6: 189–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzel, B.W., J.B. Barnum & L.M. Antosch. 1984. Ecological alterations of Iowa prairie-agricultural streams. Iowa State J. Res. 59: 5–30.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moyle, P.B. & F.R. Senanayake. 1984. Resource partitioning among the fishes of rainforest streams in Sri Lanka. J. Zool. (Lond.) 202: 195–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muncy, R.J., G.J. Atchinson, R.V. Bulkley, B.W. Menzel, L.G. Perry & R.C. Summerfelt. 1979. Effects of suspended solids and sediment on reproduction and early life of warmwater fishes: a review. EPA-600/3-79-0, Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis. 100 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuttall, P.M. & E.D. Bielby. 1973. The effects of China clay on stream invertebrates. Environ. Pollut. 5: 77–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pflieger, W.L. 1975. The fishes of Missouri. Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City. 343 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabeni, C.F. & K.E. Gibbs. 1980. Ordination of deep river invertebrate communities in relation to environmental variables. Hydrobiologia 74: 67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser, I.J. 1982. Trophic structure, reproductive success and growth rate of fishes in a natural and modified headwater stream. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 39: 968–978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, A.L. 1968. Species diversity and longitudinal succession in stream fishes. Ecology 50: 558–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P.W. 1971. Illinois streams: a classification based on their fishes and an analysis of factors responsible for disappearance of native species. Ill. Nat. Hist. Surv. Biol. Notes 76. 14 pp.

  • Starrett, W.C. 1950. Food relationships of the minnows of the Des Moines River, Iowa. Ecology 31: 216–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stauffer, J.R. & C.H. Hocutt. 1980. Inertia and recovery: an approach to stream classification and stress evaluation. Water Resour. Bull. 16: 72–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strahler, A.N. 1957. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union 38: 913–920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trautman, M.B. 1981. The fishes of Ohio, 2nd ed. The Ohio State University Press, Columbus. 784 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yount, B.(ed.) 1983. Missouri farm facts. Missouri Crop and Livestock Reporting Service, Missouri Department of Agriculture, Jefferson City, 55 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berkman, H.E., Rabeni, C.F. Effect of siltation on stream fish communities. Environ Biol Fish 18, 285–294 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00004881

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00004881

Keywords

Navigation