Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 201–211 | Cite as

The relationship of ocular morphology to feeding modes and activity periods in shallow marine teleosts from New Zealand

  • Neville W. Pankhurst


Thirty one species of shallow water teleosts were captured from the NE coast of New Zealand. Ocular morphology was assessed in terms of eye size, pupil shape, theoretical sensitivity and acuity based on retinal morphology, and regional distribution of photoreceptors within the retina. Eye size was relatively or absolutely larger in carnivores than herbivores. Diurnal planktivores and nocturnal species of small body size maximise vision by having relatively large eyes. Anterior aphakic spaces were present in most of the species examined, and 25% of the species also had posterior aphakic spaces. Theoretical sensitivity was generally higher among nocturnal than diurnal species, however, a number of benthic and pelagic carnivores showed retinal specialization for enhanced sensitivity. Diurnal species displayed high spatial acuity, with maximum acuity occurring in carnivorous species. Crepuscular species had either high or low acuity, whereas that of nocturnal species was generally lower than in diurnal species. Ten species displayed regional variation in rod density, with crepuscular and nocturnal species showing streaks of high rod density in the retina. Eleven species of carnivores displayed regional variation in cone density, with highest density usually occurring in the caudal part of the retina. In most of the species with areas of high cone density, there was a forward visual axis that coincided with the location of the aphakic space, suggestive of accomodation along that axis.

Key words

Fish vision Retina Photoreceptors Eye size Ecomorphology 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References cited

  1. Abercrombie, M. 1946. Estimation of nuclear population from microtome sections. Anat. Rec. 94: 239–247.Google Scholar
  2. Ali, M.A. 1975. Retinomotor responses. pp. 313–335. In: M.A. Ali (ed.) Vision in Fishes, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Anctil, M. 1969. Structure de la rétine chez quelques téléostéens marins du plateau continental. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 26: 597–628.Google Scholar
  4. Ayling, T. & G.J. Cox. 1982. Collins guide to the sea fishes of New Zealand, Collins, Auckland. 343 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Boehlert, G.W. 1979. Retinal development in postlarval through juvenile Sebastes diploproa: adaptations to a changing photic environment. Rev. Can. Biol. 38: 265–280.Google Scholar
  6. Collins, S.P. & J.D. Pettigrew. 1988a. Retinal topography in some reef teleosts. I. Some species with well developed areae but poorly developed streaks. Brain Behav. Evol. 31: 269–282.Google Scholar
  7. Collins, S.P. & J.D. Pettigrew. 1988b. Retinal topography in some reef teleosts. II. Some species with prominent horizontal streaks and high density areae. Brain Behav. Evol. 31: 283–295.Google Scholar
  8. Eastman, J.T. 1988. Ocular morphology in Antarctic notothenioid fishes. J. Morphol. 196: 283–306.Google Scholar
  9. Fernald, R.D. 1985. Growth of the teleost eye: novel solutions to complex constraints. Env. Biol. Fish. 13: 113–123.Google Scholar
  10. Fineran, B.A. & J.A.C. Nicol. 1974. Studies on the eyes of New Zealand parrot-fishes (Labridae). Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 186: 217–247.Google Scholar
  11. Helfman, G.S. 1986. Fish behaviour by day, night and twilight. pp. 366–387. In: T.J. Pitcher (ed.) The Behaviour of Teleost Fishes, Croom Helm, London.Google Scholar
  12. Hobson, E.S., W.N. McFarland & J.R. Chess. 1981. Crepuscular and nocturnal activities of Californian nearshore fishes, with consideration of their scotopic visual pigments and the photic environment. U.S. Fish. Bull. 79: 1–30.Google Scholar
  13. Hughes, A. 1977. The topography of vision in mammals. pp. 613–756. In: F. Crescitelli (ed.) Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Vol VII/5, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  14. Kirschfeld, K. 1974. The absolute sensitivity of lens and compound eyes. Z. Naturforsch. 29: 592–596.Google Scholar
  15. Locket, N.A. 1975. Some problems of deep-sea fish eyes. pp. 645–656. In: M.A. Ali (ed.) Vision in Fishes, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Lythgoe, J.N. 1979. The ecology of vision. Clarendon Press, Oxford. 244 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Lythgoe, J.N. 1980. Vision in fishes: ecological adaptations. pp. 431–445. In: M.A. Ali (ed.) Environmental Physiology of Fishes, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  18. MacDiarmid, A.B. 1981. Factors influencing the distribution and abundance of two temperate planktivorous reef fish, Pempheris adspersa and Scorpis violaceus. M. Sc. Thesis, University of Auckland, Auckland. 101 pp.Google Scholar
  19. Marshall, N.B. 1979. Developments in deep-sea biology. Blandford Press, Poole. 566 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Munk, O. 1966. Ocular anatomy of some deep-sea teleosts. Dana Rep. 70: 1–62.Google Scholar
  21. Munk, O. 1970. On the occurrence and significance of horizontal band-shaped retinal areae in teleosts. Vidensk. Meddel. Dansk. Natur. For. 133: 85–120.Google Scholar
  22. Munk, O. & R.D. Friederiksen. 1974. On the function of aphakic apertures in teleosts. Vidensk. Meddel. Dansk Natur. For. 137: 65–94.Google Scholar
  23. Muntz, W.R.A. 1982. Visual adaptations to different light environments in Amazonian fishes. Rev. Can. Biol. 41: 35–46.Google Scholar
  24. Muntz, W.R.A. & W.N. McFarland. 1973. The significance of spectral position in the rhodopsins of tropical marine fishes. Vision Res. 13: 1829–1874.Google Scholar
  25. O'Connell, C.P. 1963. The structure of the eye of Sardinops caerulea, Engraulis mordax and four other pelagic marine teleosts. J. Morphol. 113: 287–329.Google Scholar
  26. Pankhurst, N.W. 1987. Intra- and interspecific changes in retinal morphology among mesopelagic and demersal teleosts from the slope waters of New Zealand. Env. Biol. Fish. 19: 269–280.Google Scholar
  27. Pankhurst, N.W. & J.N. Lythgoe. 1983. Changes in vision and olfaction during sexual maturation in the European eel Anguilla anguilla (L.). J. Fish Biol. 23: 229–240.Google Scholar
  28. Paul, L.J. 1986. New Zealand fishes. An identification guide. Reed Methuen, Auckland 184 pp.Google Scholar
  29. Pitcher, T.J. & J.R. Turner. 1986. Danger at dawn: experimental support for the twilight hypothesis in shoaling minnows. J. Fish Biol. 29 (Suppl. A): 59–70.Google Scholar
  30. Pumphrey, R.J. 1961. Concerning vision. pp. 193–208. In: J.A. Ramsay & V.B. Wigglesworth (ed.) The Cell and Organism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  31. Sadler, J.D. 1973. The focal length of the fish eye lens and visual acuity. Vision Res. 13: 417–423.Google Scholar
  32. Saunders, A.J. & J.C. Montgomery. 1985. Field and laboratory studies of the feeding behaviour of the piper Hyporhamphus ihi with reference to the role of the lateral line in feeding. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 224: 209–221.Google Scholar
  33. Schwassman, H.O. 1975. Refractive state, accomodation, and resolving power of the fish eye. pp. 279–288. In: M.A. Ali (ed.) Vision in Fishes, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  34. Sivak, J.G. 1975. Accomodative mechanisms in aquatic vertebrates. pp. 289–298. In: M.A. Ali (ed.) Vision in Fishes, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  35. Sivak, J.G. 1982. Optical characteristics of the eye of the flounder. J. comp. Physiol. 146: 345–350.Google Scholar
  36. Somiya, H. 1987. Dynamic mechanism of visual accomodation in teleosts: structure of the lens muscle and its nerve control. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 230: 77–91.Google Scholar
  37. Tamura, T. & W.J. Wisby. 1963. The visual sense of pelagic fishes, especially the visual axis accomodation. Bull. Mar. Sci. Gulf. Carib. 13: 433–448.Google Scholar
  38. Thompson, S. 1981. Fish of the Marine Reserve: a guide to the identification and biology of common coastal fish of northeastern New Zealand. Leigh Laboratory publication, University of Auckland, Auckland. 364 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Neville W. Pankhurst
    • 1
  1. 1.Leigh Marine LaboratoryUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations