Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 45, Issue 3, pp 299–310 | Cite as

Biology of the Galapagos shark,Carcharhinus galapagensis, in Hawai'i

  • Bradley M. Wetherbee
  • Gerald L. Crow
  • Christopher G. Lowe
Article

Synopsis

Catch records from the Hawai'i Cooperative Shark Research and Control Program, which operated in Hawai'i from 1967–1969, were examined and data on the Galapagos shark,Carcharhinus galapagensis were analyzed. A total of 304 Galapagos sharks was caught, predominantly with longlines. More female sharks were caught than males, and the catch was skewed geographically. On the island of O'ahu the highest catch rates occurred along the north and south coasts. High catch rates also occurred near points of land, where longshore currents converge. Average depth of capture was greater for juveniles (45.1 m) and mature males (60.2 m), than for subadults (38.8 m) and mature female sharks (34.2 m). Males appear to reach maturity between 205 and 239 cm total length, and females between 215 and 245 cm. Litter size ranged from 4 to 16 pups, with an average of 8.7. In Hawaiian waters Galapagos sharks are born at just over 80 cm total length. Mating and parturition apparently occur early in the year, and gestation is estimated to be about 12 months. Stomach contents consisted mainly of teleosts and benthic prey, and ontogenetic changes in diet occurred as sharks increased in size. Sharks consumed a smaller proportion of teleosts and more elasmobranchs with increasing size. Dietary diversity also increased with increasing size of shark.

Key words

Catch rate Distribution Reproduction Diet Elasmobranchs 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References cited

  1. Bass, A.J. 1977. Long term recoveries of tagged sharks. Copeia 1977: 574–575.Google Scholar
  2. Bass, A.J., J.D. D'Aubrey & M. Kistnasamy.1973. Sharks of the east coast of southern Africa. 1. The genusCarcharhinus (Carcharhinidae). Invest. Rep. Oceanogr. Res. Inst., Durban 33. 168 pp.Google Scholar
  3. Beebe, W. & J. Tee-Van. 1941. Eastern Pacific expeditions of the New York Zoological Society. 25. Fishes from the tropical eastern Pacific. Part 2. Sharks. Zoologica 26: 93–122.Google Scholar
  4. Castro, J.I. 1983. The sharks of North American waters. Texas A & M University Press, College Station. 180 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Compagno, L.J.V. 1984. Sharks of the World. An annotated and illustrated catalogue of shark species known to date. Part 2, Carcharhiniformes. FAO Fish Synop. (125) 4: 251–655.Google Scholar
  6. Cortes, E. & S.H. Gruber. 1990. Diet, feeding habits, and estimates of daily ration of young lemon sharks,Negaprion brevirostris. Copeia 1990: 204–218.Google Scholar
  7. Davies, D.H. & L.S. Joubert. 1967. Tag evaluation and shark tagging in south African waters, 1964–1965. pp. 111–140.In: P.W. Gilbert, R.F. Mathewson & J.P. Rapp (ed.) Sharks, Skates and Rays, Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  8. De Crosta, M.A., L.R. Taylor Jr. & J.D. Parrish. 1984. Age determination, growth, and energetics of three species of carcharhinid sharks in Hawai'i. pp. 75–95.In: Proceedings of the Second Symposium on Resource Investigations of the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands, Vol. 2, University of Hawai'i Sea Grant, UNIHI-SEAGRANT MR-84-01.Google Scholar
  9. Edwards, A.J. & H.R. Lubbock. 1982. The shark population of Saint Paul's Rocks. Copeia 1982; 223–225.Google Scholar
  10. Garrick, J.A.F. 1967. A broad view ofCarcharhinus species, their systematics and distribution. pp. 85–91.In: P.W. Gilbert, R.W. Mathewson & J.P. Rall (ed.) Sharks, Skates and Rays, Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  11. Garrick, J.A.F. & L.P. Schultz. 1963. A guide to potentially dangerous sharks. pp. 3–60.In: P.W. Gilbert, J.A.F. Garrick & L.P. Schultz (ed.) Sharks and Survival, D.C. Health & Co., Boston.Google Scholar
  12. Johnson R.H. 1978 Sharks of tropical and temperate seas. Les Editions Du Pacifique. Singapore. 170 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Kato, S. & A.H. Carvallo. 1967. Shark tagging in the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean, 1962–1965. pp. 93–109.In: P.W. Gilbert, R.F. Mathewson & J.P. Rall (ed.) Sharks, Skates and Rays, Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  14. Krebs, C.J. 1989. Ecological methods. Harper Collins Publishers, New York. 654 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Langton, R.S. 1982. Diet overlap between the Atlantic cod,Gadus morhua, silver hake,Merluccius bilinearis and fifteen other northwest Atlantic finfish. U.S. Fish. Bull. 80: 745–759.Google Scholar
  16. Last, P.R. & J.D. Stevens. 1994. Sharks and rays of Australia. CSIRO, Canberra. 513 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Limbaugh, C. 1963. Field notes on sharks. pp. 53–94.In: P.W. Gilbert, J.A.F. Garrick & L.P. Schultz (ed.) Sharks and Survival, D.C. Heath Co., Boston.Google Scholar
  18. Lowe, C.G., B.M. Wetherbee, G.L. Crow & A.L. Tester. 1996. Ontogenetic dietary shifts and feeding behavior of the tiger shark,Galeocerdo cuvier, in Hawaiian waters. Env. Biol. Fish. (in press).Google Scholar
  19. Pinchuk, V.I. 1981. Mistaken identification of the so-called ‘dogfish’, a member of the gray shark genus,Carcharhinus, from open waters of world oceans. J. Ichthyol. 21: 115–117.Google Scholar
  20. Randall, J.E. 1963. A fatal shark attack by the sharkCarcharhinus galapagensis at St. Thomas, Virgin Islands. Caribb. J. Sci. 3: 201–205.Google Scholar
  21. Reid, D.D. & M. Krogh. 1992. Assessment of catches from protective shark meshing off New South Wales beaches between 1950 and 1990. pp. 283–296.In: J.G. Pepperell (ed.) Sharks: Biology and Fisheries, Aust. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 43.Google Scholar
  22. Rosenblatt, R.H. & W.J. Baldwin. 1958. A review of the eastern Pacific sharks of the genusCarcharhinus, with a redescription ofC. malpeloensis (Fowler) and California records ofC. remotus (Dumeril). Calif. Fish Game 44: 137–159.Google Scholar
  23. Simpfendorfer, C. 1992. Biology of tiger sharks (Galeocerdo cuvier) caught by the Queensland shark meshing program off Townsville, Australia. pp. 33–43.In: J.G. Pepperell (ed.) Sharks: Biology and Fisheries, Aust. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 43.Google Scholar
  24. Taniuchi, T., H. Tachikawa, Y. Kurata & Y. Nose. 1985. Galapagos shark,Carcharhinus galapagensis, from the Ogasawara Islands, Japan. Japan. J. Ichthyol. 31: 449–452.Google Scholar
  25. Taylor, L.R. Jr. 1994. Sharks of Hawai'i. University of Hawai'i Press, Honolulu. 126 pp.Google Scholar
  26. Wass, R.C. 1971. A comparative study of the life history, distribution, and ecology of the sandbar shark and gray reef shark in Hawai'i. Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu. 219 pp.Google Scholar
  27. Wetherbee, B.M., C.G. Lowe & G.L. Crow. 1994. A review of shark control in Hawaii with recommendations for future research. Pac. Sci. 48: 95–115.Google Scholar
  28. Wetherbee, B.M., S.H. Gruber & E. Cortes. 1990. Diet, feeding habits, digestion, and consumption in sharks with special reference to the lemon shark,Negaprion brevirostris. pp. 29–47.In: H.L. Pratt, Jr., S.H. Gruber & T. Taniuchi (ed.) Elasmobranchs as Living Resources: Advances in the Biology, Ecology, Systematics, and the Status of the Fisheries, NOAA Tech. Rep. NMFS 90.Google Scholar
  29. Yano, K. & S. Tanaka. 1984. Some biological aspects of the deepsea squaloid sharkCentroscymnus from Suruga Bay, Japan. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 50: 249–256.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bradley M. Wetherbee
    • 1
  • Gerald L. Crow
    • 2
  • Christopher G. Lowe
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of Hawai'i at ManoaHonoluluU.S.A.
  2. 2.Waikiki Aquarium, School of Ocean and Earth Science and TechnologyUniversity of Hawai'i at ManoaHonoluluU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations