Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 229–235 | Cite as

A test of the hypothesis of pheromone attraction in salmonid migration

  • Geoff A. Black
  • J. Brian Dempson


We tested the hypothesis that anadromous salmonids are guided on their homeward migration by population-specific pheromones. Our findings do not support the hypothesis. Wild migrant Arctic charr,Salvelinus alpinus, from Ikarut River, Labrador were transferred and held in a tributary previously uninhabited by anadromous fish. None of the charr migrating up Ikarut River entered the tributary after fish were transferred. Similarly, migrant charr, which were caught in Ikarut River and released in the tributary below the captive fish, did not remain in the tributary. We re-evaluated the data which have been used to uphold the concept of pheromone attraction in salmonid migration and concluded that support for the hypothesis is unsubstantiated.


Homing Nordeng Salvelinus alpinus 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References cited

  1. Anderson, T.C. & B.P. McDonald. 1978. A portable weir for counting migrating fishes in rivers. Fish. Mar. Serv. Tech. Rept. No. 733. 11 pp.Google Scholar
  2. Brannon, E.L., R.P. Whitman & T.P. Quinn. 1984. Responses of returning adult coho salmon to home water and population-specific odours. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 113: 374–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cooper, J.C., A.T. Scholz, R.M. Horrall, A.D. Hasler & D.M. Madison. 1976. Experimental confirmation of the olfactory hypothesis with homing, artificially imprinted coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 33: 703–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Harden-Jones, F.R. 1968. Fish migration. Edward Arnold (Publ.) Ltd., London. 325 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Hasler, A.D. & A.T. Scholz. 1983. Olfactory imprinting and homing in salmon. Springer-Verlag. Berlin. 134 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hasler, A.D., A.T. Scholz & R.M. Horrall. 1978. Olfactory imprinting and homing in salmon. Amer. Scient. 66: 347–355.Google Scholar
  7. Hasler, A.D. & W.J. Wisby. 1951. Discrimination of stream odors by fishes and relation to parent stream behavior. Amer. Nat. 85: 223–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hara, T.J., S. MacDonald, R.E. Evans, T. Marui & S. Arai. 1984. Morpholine, bile acids and skin mucus as possible chemical cues in salmonid homing: electrophysiological re-evaluation. pp. 363–378. In: J.D. McCleave, G.P. Arnold, J.J. Dodson & W.H. Neill (ed.) Mechanisms of Migration in Fishes, Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Johnson, L. 1980. The Arctic charr,Salvelinus alpinus. pp. 15–98. In: E.K. Balon (ed.) Charrs: Salmonid Fishes of the GenusSalvelinus, Perspectives in Vertebrate Science 1, Dr W. Junk Publishers, The Hague.Google Scholar
  10. Leggett, W.C. 1977. The ecology of fish migrations. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 8: 285–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Nordeng, H. 1961. On the biology of charr (Salmo alpinus L.) in Salangen, North Norway. Nytt Mag. Zool. 10: 67–123.Google Scholar
  12. Nordeng, H. 1971. Is the local orientation of anadromous fishes determined by pheromones? Nature 233: 411–413.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Nordeng, H. 1977. A pheromone hypothesis for homeward migration in anadromous salmonids. Oikos 28: 155–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nordeng, H. 1983. Solution to the ‘char problem’ based on Arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus) in Norway. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 40: 1372–1387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Quinn, T.P., E.L. Brannon & R.P. Whitman. 1983. Pheromones and the water source preferences of adult coho salmonOncorhynchus kisutch Walbaum. J. Fish Biol. 22: 677–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Scholz, A.T., C.K. Gosse, J.C. Cooper, R.M. Horrall, A.D. Hasler, R.I. Day & R.J. Poff. 1978. Homing of rainbow trout transplanted in Lake Michigan: a comparison of three procedures used for imprinting and stocking. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 107: 439–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Selset, R. & K.B. Doving. 1980. Behaviour of mature and anadromous char (Salmo alpinus L.) towards odorants produced by smolts of their own population. Acta Physiol. Scand. 108: 113–122.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Solomon, D.J. 1973. Evidence for pheromone-induced homing by migrating Atlantic salmon,Salmo salar (L.). Nature 244: 231–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Stabell, O.B. 1982. Homing of Atlantic salmon in relation to olfaction and genetics. pp. 238–246. In: E.L. Brannon & E.O. Salo (ed.) Proceedings of the Salmon and Trout Migratory Behaviour Symposium, University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
  20. Stabell, O.B. 1984. Homing and olfaction in salmonids: a critical review with special reference to the Atlantic salmon. Biol. Rev. 59: 333–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sutterlin, A.M. & R. Gray. 1973. Chemical basis for homing of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) to a hatchery. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 30: 985–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tilzey, R.D.J. 1977. Repeat homing of brown trout (Salmo trutta) in Lake Eucumbene, New South Wales, Australia. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 34: 1085–1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. White, H.C. 1934a. Spawning migration of salmon in E. Apple River. Rept. Biol. Board Can 1933. pp. 41–42.Google Scholar
  24. White, H.C. 1934b. Some facts and theories concerning the Atlantic salmon. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 34: 360–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. White, H.C. 1936. The homing of salmon in Apple River, N.S. J. Biol. Board Can. 2: 391–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wisby, W.J. & A.D. Hasler. 1954. Effect of olfactory occlusion on migrating silver salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 11: 472–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zar, J.H. 1974. Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs. 620 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr W. Junk Publishers 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Geoff A. Black
    • 1
  • J. Brian Dempson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Fisheries and OceansFisheries Research BranchSt. John'sCanada

Personalised recommendations