Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 36, Issue 2, pp 109–126 | Cite as

Microhabitat use by marsh-edge fishes in a Louisiana estuary

  • Donald M. Baltz
  • Chet Rakocinski
  • John W. Fleeger


We used a drop sampler to characterize use of the marsh-edge ecotone by small fishes along two transects running inland from the Gulf of Mexico for ca. 25 km in Louisiana's Barataria-Caminada Bay System. Monthly sampling was stratified among upper, middle, and lower reaches and within reaches to characterize fish responses to salinity, depth, distance from shore, substrate, dissolved oxygen concentration, temperature, turbidity, velocity, and emergent stem density. In 681 quantitative samples, covering 658 m2, collected between October 1987 and October 1989, we collected 57 fish species and 16 864 individuals, primarily larvae and juveniles. The 15 most abundant fishes, comprising 97.7% of all individuals, were concentrated near the marsh edge (i.e., 0 to 1.25 m distance). Some significant differences within species for seasonal variables (e.g., temperature and dissolved oxygen concentration) reflected the ephemeral duration of early life history stages. Other differences reflected ontogenetic microhabitat shifts (e.g., depth and distance from shore). Within ecological groups, characterized as demersal residents, nektonic transients, and demersal transients, spatial and temporal segregation reflected the particular habitat requirements of each species. In a principal component analysis of microhabitat use, the first three components were interpreted as seasonal, depth-and-distance, and salinity axes, respectively. The array of species and size classes in principal component space reflected the complex dimensionality of microhabitat use. The high density of fish larvae and juveniles near the marsh edge confirmed the importance of the marsh-edge ecotone as a nursery for many estuarine-dependent fishes.

Key words

Early life history Nursery habitat Spartina marsh 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References cited

  1. Baltz. D.M. 1990. Chapter 18, Autecology, pp. 583–605. In: C.B. Schreck & P.B. Moyle (eds) Methods for Fish Biology, American Fisheries Society, Bethesda.Google Scholar
  2. Baltz, D.M., P.B. Moyle & N.J. Knight. 1982. Competitive interactions between benthic stream fishes, riffle sculpin, Cottus gulosus, and speckled dace, Rhinichthys osculus. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 39: 1502–1511.Google Scholar
  3. Baltz, D.M., B. Vondracek, L.R. Brown & P.B. Moyle. 1987. Influence of temperature on microhabitat choice of fishes in a California stream. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 116: 12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumann, R.H. 1987. Chapter 2. Physical variables. pp. 8–17. In: W.H. Conner & J.W. Day, Jr. (eds) The Ecology of Barataria Basin: An Estuarine Profile, U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv. Biol. Rep. 85 (7.13).Google Scholar
  5. Boesch, D.F. & R.E. Turner. 1984. Dependence of fishery species on salt marshes: the role of food and refuge. Estuaries 7: 460–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bovee, K.D. 1982. A guide to stream habitat analysis using the instream flow incremental methodology. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Services Program FWS/OBS-82/26. 248 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Bovee, K.D. & T. Cochnauer. 1977. Development and evaluation of weighted criteria, probability-of-use curves for instream flow assessments: fisheries. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Services Program FWS/OBS-77/63. 39 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Childers, D.L., J.W. Day, Jr. & R.A. Muller. 1990. Relating climatological forcing to coastal water levels in Louisiana estuaries and the potential importance of El Nino-Southern Oscillation events. Climate Research 1: 31–42.Google Scholar
  9. Connell, J.H. 1980. Diversity and the coevolution of competitors, or the ghost of competition past. Oikos 35: 131–138.Google Scholar
  10. Conner, W.H. & J.W. Day, Jr. 1987. Chapter 1. Description of the basin. pp. 1–7. In: W.H. Conner & J.W. Day, Jr. (eds) The Ecology of Barataria Basin: An Estuarine Profile. U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv. Biol. Rep. 85 (7.13).Google Scholar
  11. Cyrus, D.P. & S.J.M. Blaber. 1987. The influence of turbidity on juvenile marine fish in estuaries of Natal, South Africa. Continental Shelf Research 7: 1411–1416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dagg, M.J. 1988. Physical and biological responses to the passage of a winter storm in the coastal and inner shelf waters of the northern Gulf of Mexico. Continental Shelf Research 8: 167–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Day, J.W., Jr., C.A.S. Hall, W.M. Kemp & A. Yanez-Arancibia. 1989. Estuarine Ecology, John Wiley, New York. 558 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Feller, R.J., B.C. Coull & B.T. Hentschel. 1990. Meiobenthic copepods: tracers of where juvenile Leiostomus xanthurus (Pisces) feed? Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 47: 1913–1919.Google Scholar
  15. Fraser, D.F. & T.E. Sise. 1980. Observations on stream minnows in a patchy environment: a test of a theory of habitat distribution. Ecology 61: 790–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gleason, D.F. 1986. Utilization of salt marsh plants by postlarval brown shrimp: carbon assimilation rates and food preferences. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 31: 151–158.Google Scholar
  17. Gleason, D.F. & G.M. Wellington. 1988. Food resources of postlarval brown shrimp (Penaeus aztecus) in a Texas salt marsh. Mar. Biol. 97: 329–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gould, S.J. & R.C. Lewontin. 1979. The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptionist programme. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B205: 581–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hettler, W.F., Jr., 1989. Nekton use of regularly-flooded saltmarsh cordgrass habitat in North Carolina. USA. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 56: 111–118.Google Scholar
  20. Hoese, H.K. & R.H. Moore. 1977. Fishes of the Gulf of Mexico, Texas, Louisiana and adjacent waters. Texas A & M Univ. Press, College Station. 327 pp.Google Scholar
  21. Hurlbert, S.H. 1981. A gentile depilation of the niche: Dicean resource sets in resource hyperspace. Evolutionary Theory 5: 177–184.Google Scholar
  22. Jobling, M. 1981. Temperature tolerance and the final preferendum — rapid methods for the assessment of optimum growth temperatures. J. Fish. Biol. 19: 439–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kneib, R.T. 1982. The effects of predation by wading birds (Ardeidae) and blue crabs (Callinectes sapidus) on the population size structure of the common munnichog, Fundulus heteroclitus. Estuarine, Coastal, and Shelf Science 14: 159–165.Google Scholar
  24. Kneib, R.T. 1987. Predation risk and use of intertidal habitats by young fishes and shrimp. Ecology 68: 379–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lippson, A.J. & R.L. Moran. 1974. Manual for identification of early developmental stages of fishes of the Potomac River Estuary. Maryland Dept. Nat. Res. PPSP-MP-13, Baltimore. 282 pp.Google Scholar
  26. Livingston, R.J. 1988. Inadequacy of species-level designations for ecological studies of coastal migratory fishes. Env. Biol. Fish. 22: 225–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Magnuson, J.J., L.B. Crowder & P.A. Medvick. 1979. Temperature as an ecological resource. Amer. Zool. 19: 331–343.Google Scholar
  28. McKee, K.L. & W.H. Patrick, Jr. 1988. The relationship of smooth cordgrass (Spartina alterniflora) to tidal datums: a review. Estuaries 11: 143–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mercer, L.P. 1984. A biological and fisheries profile of spotted seatrout, Cynoscion nebulosus. North Caroline Dept. Nat. Resources and Community Development Division Marine Fish. N.C. Spec. Sci. Rpt. 40, Morehead City. 87 pp.Google Scholar
  30. Miller, P.J. 1979. A concept of fish phenology. Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 44: 1–28.Google Scholar
  31. Pearcy, W.G. & S.S. Myers 1974. Larval fishes of Yaquina Bay, Oregon: a nursery ground for marine fishes? U.S. Fish. Bull. 72: 201–213.Google Scholar
  32. Power, J.H. 1989. Sink or swim: growth dynamics and zooplankton hydromechanics. Amer. Nat. 133: 706–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rakocinski, C., D.M. Baltz & J.W. Fleeger. 1992. Correspondence between environmental gradients and the community structure of marsh-edge fishes in a Louisiana estuary. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. (in press).Google Scholar
  34. Rothschild, B.J. 1986. Dynamics of marine fish populations. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. 277 pp.Google Scholar
  35. Rozas, L.P. & W.E. Odum. 1988. Occupation of submerged aquatic vegetation by fishes: testing roles of food and refuge. Oecologia 77: 101–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. SAS Institute. 1985. SAS/STAT Guide for Personal Computers, Version 6 edition. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary.Google Scholar
  37. Sasser, C.E. 1977. Distribution of vegetation in Louisiana coastal marshes in response to tidal flooding. Masters Thesis, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge. 40 pp.Google Scholar
  38. Sklar, F. H. & R. Costanza. 1986. A spatial simulation of ecosystem succession in a Louisiana coastal landscape. pp. 467–472. In: Proceedings of the 1986 Summer Computer Simulation Conference, July 28–30, 1986, Reno.Google Scholar
  39. Smith, L.D. & B.C. Coull. 1987. Juvenile spot (Pisces) and grass shrimp predation on meiobenthos in muddy and sandy substrata. J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol. 105: 123–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Turner, R.E. 1977. Intertidal vegetation and commercial yields of penaeid shrimp. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 106: 411–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Turner, R.E. & D.F. Boesch. 1987. Aquatic animal production and wetland relationships: insights gleaned following wetland loss and gain. pp. 25–39. In: D.D. Hook et al. (eds) The Ecology and Management of Wetlands, Volume 1: Ecology of Wetlands, Timber Press, Portland.Google Scholar
  42. Van Dolah, R.F. 1978. Factors regulating the distribution and population dynamics of the amphipod Gammarus palustris in an intertidal salt marsh. Ecol. Mongr. 48: 191–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Volk, E.C., C.A. Wissmar, C.A. Simestad & D.M. Eggers. 1984. Relationship between otolith microstructure and the growth of juvenile chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) under different prey rations. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 41: 126–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Weinstein, M.P. 1979. Shallow marsh habitats as primary nurseries for fish and shellfish, Cape Fear River, North Carolina. U.S. Fish. Bull. 77: 339–357.Google Scholar
  45. Werner, E.E., D.J. Hall, D.R. Laughlin, D.J. Wagner, L.A. Wilsmann & F.C. Funk. 1977. Habitat partitioning in a freshwater fish community. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 34: 360–370.Google Scholar
  46. Zar, J.H. 1984. Biostatistical analysis. 2nd ed. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs. 718 pp.Google Scholar
  47. Zimmerman, R.J. & T. Minello. 1984. Densities of Penaeus aztecus, Penaeus setiferus, and other natant macrofauna in a Texas salt marsh. Estuaries 7: 421–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zimmerman, R.J., T.J. Minello & G. Zamora. 1984. Selection of vegetated habitat by brown shrimp, Penaeus aztecus, in a Galveston Bay salt marsh. U.S. Fish. Bull. 82: 325–336.Google Scholar
  49. Zimmerman, R., T. Minello, E. Klima & J. Nance. 1991. Effects of accelerated sea-level rise on coastal secondary production. Proceedings of Coastal Zone 91, 7th Symposium on Coastal and Ocean Management, July 8–12, 1991, Long Beach. 15 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donald M. Baltz
    • 1
    • 2
  • Chet Rakocinski
    • 1
  • John W. Fleeger
    • 3
  1. 1.Coastal Fisheries InstituteLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeU.S.A.
  2. 2.Department of Oceanography and Coastal SciencesLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeU.S.A.
  3. 3.Department of Zoology and PhysiologyLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations