Biogeochemistry

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 35–60

A three-year study of controls on methane emissions from two Michigan peatlands

  • Robert D. Shannon
  • Jeffrey R. White
Article

Abstract

We investigate temporal changes in methane emissions over a three-year period from two peatlands in Michigan. Mean daily fluxes ranged from 0.6–68.4 mg CH4 m−2d−1 in plant communities dominated by Chamaedaphne calyculata, an eficaceous shrub, to 11.5–209 mg CH4 m−2d−1 in areas dominated by plants with aerenchymatous tissues, such as Carex oligosperma and Scheuchzeria palustris. Correlations between methane flux and water table position were significant at all sites for one annual cycle when water table fluctuations ranged from 15 cm above to 50 cm below the peat surface. Correlations were not significant during the second and third annual periods with smaller water table fluctuations. Methane flux was strongly correlated with peat temperatures at −5 to −40 cm (rs = 0.82 to 0.98) for all three years at sites with flora acting as conduits for methane transport. At shrub sites, the correlations between methane flux and peat temperature were weak to not significant during the first two years, but were strong in the third year.

Low rates of methane consumption (−0.2 to −1.5 mg CH4 m−2 d−1 ) were observed at shrub sites when the water table was below −20 cm, while sites with plants capable of methane transport always had positive net fluxes of methane. The methane oxidizing potential at both types of sites was confirmed by peat core experiments. The results of this study indicate that methane emissions occur at rates that cannot be explained by diffusion alone; plant communities play a significant role in altering methane flux from peatland ecosystems by directly transporting methane from anaerobic peat to the atmosphere.

Key words

bogs methane peatlands wetlands 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bédard C & Knowles R (1989) Physiology, biochemistry, and specific inhibitors of CH4, NH4 + , and CO oxidation by methanotrophs and nitrifiers. Microbiol. Rev. 53: 68–84Google Scholar
  2. Chanton JP & Dacey JWH (1991) Effects of vegetation on methane flux, reservoirs, and carbon isotopic composition. In: Sharkey T et al. (Eds) Trace Gas Emissions from Plants (pp 65–92). Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Crill PM, Bartlett KB, Harriss RC, Gorham E, Verry ES, Sebacher DI, Madzar L & Sanner W (1988) Methane flux from Minnesota peatlands. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 2: 371–384Google Scholar
  4. Dacey JWH & Klug MJ (1979) Methane efflux from lake sediments through water lilies. Science 203: 1253–1254Google Scholar
  5. Dise NB (1992) Methane emission from Minnesota peatlands: Spatial and seasonal variability. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 7: 123–142Google Scholar
  6. Dise NB, Gorham E & Verry ES (1993) Environmental factors controlling methane emissions from peatlands in northern Minnesota. J. Geophys. Res. 98 (D6): 10583–10594Google Scholar
  7. Fechner EJ & Herond HF (1992) Methane transport and oxidation in the unsaturated zone of a Sphagnum peatland. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 6: 33–44Google Scholar
  8. Hesslein RH (1976) An in situ sampler for close interval pore water studies. Limnol. Oceanogr. 21: 912–914Google Scholar
  9. Jähne B, Heinz G & Dietrich W (1987) Measurement of the diffusion coefficients of sparingly soluble gases in water. J. Geophys. Res. 92 (C10): 10767–10776Google Scholar
  10. Lansdown JM, Quay PD & King SL (1992) CH4 production via CO2 reduction in a temperate bog: A source of13C-depleted CH4. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 56: 3493–3503Google Scholar
  11. McAuliffe C (1971) GC determination of solutes by multiple phase equilibration. Chem. Tech. 1: 46–51Google Scholar
  12. Moore T, Roulet N & Knowles R (1990) Spatial and temporal variations of methane flux from subarctic/northern boreal fens. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 4: 29–46Google Scholar
  13. Moore TR & Knowles R (1990) Methane emissions from fen, bog and swamp peatlands in Quebec. Biogeochem. 11: 45–61Google Scholar
  14. Moore TR & Roulet NT (1993) Methane flux: Water table relations in northern peatlands. Geophys. Res. Lett. 20: 587–590Google Scholar
  15. Nichols DS & Brown JM (1980) Evaporation from a sphagnum moss surface. J. Hydrol. 48: 303–311Google Scholar
  16. Roulet NT (1991) Surface level and water table fluctuations in a subarctic fen. Arctic and Alpine Res. 23: 303–310Google Scholar
  17. Roulet NT, Ash R & Moore TR (1992) Low boreal wetlands as a source of atmospheric methane. J. Geophys. Res. 97 (D4): 3739–3749Google Scholar
  18. Sebacher DI, Harriss RC, Bartlett KB, Sebacher SM & Grice SS (1986) Atmospheric methane sources: Alaskan tundra bogs, an alpine fen, and a subarctic boreal marsh. Tellus 38B: 1–10Google Scholar
  19. Sokal RR & Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. W.H. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  20. Svensson BH & Rosswall T (1984) In situ methane production from acid peat in plant communities with different moisture regimes in a subarctic mire. Oikos 43: 341–350Google Scholar
  21. Whalen SC & Reeburgh WS (1988) A methane flux time series for tundra environments. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 2: 399–409Google Scholar
  22. Whalen SC & Reeburgh WS (1990a) A methane flux transect along the trans-Alaska pipeline haul road. Tellus 42B: 237–249Google Scholar
  23. Whalen SC & Reeburgh WS (1990b) Consumption of atmospheric methane by tundra soils. Nature 346: 160–162Google Scholar
  24. Whalen SC, Reeburgh WS & Sandbeck KA (1990) Rapid methane oxidation in a landfill cover soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56: 3405–3411Google Scholar
  25. Whalen SC & Reeburgh WS (1992) Interannual variations in tundra methane emission: A 4-year time series at fixed sites. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 6: 139–159Google Scholar
  26. Whiting GJ & Chanton JP (1992) Plant-dependent CH4 emission in a subarctic Canadian fen. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 6: 226–231Google Scholar
  27. Wilson JO, Crill PM, Bartlett KB, Sebacher DI, Harriss RC & Sass RL (1989) Seasonal variation of methane emission from a temperate swamp. Biogeochem. 8: 55–71Google Scholar
  28. Valentine DW, Holland EA & Schimel DS (1994) Ecosystem and physiological controls over methane production in northern wetlands. J. Geophys. Res. 99 (D1): 1563–1571Google Scholar
  29. Yavitt JB & Lang GE (1990) Methane production in contrasting wetland sites: Response to organic-chemical components of peat and to sulfate reduction. Geomicrobiol. J. 8: 27–46Google Scholar
  30. Yavitt JB, Downey DM, Lancaster E & Lang GE (1990a) Methane consumption in decomposing Sphagnum-derived peat. Soil Biol. Biochem. 22: 441–447Google Scholar
  31. Yavitt JB, Lang GE & Sexstone AJ (1990b) Methane fluxes in wetland and forest soils, beaver ponds, and low-order streams of a temperate forest ecosystem. J. Geophys. Res. 95 (D13): 22,463–22,474Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert D. Shannon
    • 1
  • Jeffrey R. White
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Public and Environmental AffairsIndiana UniversityBloomington
  2. 2.Department of Geological SciencesIndiana UniversityBloomington

Personalised recommendations