Advertisement

Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 171–176 | Cite as

Distribution, production, and age structure of slimy sculpin in an Arctic lake

  • Michael E. McDonald
  • Benjamin E. Cuker
  • Samuel C. Mozley
Article

Synopsis

Slimy sculpins (Cottus cognatus) were caught in the littoral region of Toolik Lake, an arctic lake. These sculpins grew slower and lived longer (71 mm at 8+ years) than more southerly populations. Sculpin distribution along the slope of the rocky littoral zone was greatest at the 3.5 m depth and coincided with the rock-mud interface. The hypothesis that this ‘preferred’ area provided both increased prey and reduced predation was advanced. Yearly production estimate of littoral sculpins was 0.40 g · m−2 · yr−1 with a P/B ratio of 0.36. This is considerably less than estimates for more southerly populations of the same species.

Keywords

Cottus cognatus Vertical population gradient Rocky littoral zone Habitat preference Aging Growth Alaska Latitudinal differences 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References cited

  1. Arthur, J.R., L. Margolis & H.P. Arai. 1976. Parasites of fishes of Aishihik and Stevens lakes, Yukon Territory, and potential consequences of their interlake transfer through a proposed water diversion for hydroelectrical purposes. J. Fish Res. Board Can. 33: 2489–2499.Google Scholar
  2. Backiel, T. & E.D. LeCren. 1978. Some density relationships for fish population parameters. pp. 279–302. In: S.D. Gerking (ed.) Ecology of Freshwater Fish Production, John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Barr, A.J., J.H. Goodnight, J.P. Sall & J.T. Helwig. 1976. A User's Guide to SAS 76. Sparks Press, Raleigh, NC. 329 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Chapman, D.W. 1971. Production. pp. 199–214. In: W.E. Ricker (ed.) Methods for Assessment of Fish Production in Fresh Water, International Biological Program Handbook No. 3, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  5. Clary, J.R. 1972. Predation on the brown trout by the slimy sculpin. Prog. Fish Cult. 34: 91–95.Google Scholar
  6. Craig, P.C. & J. Wells. 1976. Life history notes for a population of slimy sculpin (Cottus cognatus) in an Alaskan arctic stream. J. Fish Res. Board Can. 33: 1639–1642.Google Scholar
  7. Fotz, J.W. 1976. Fecundity of the slimy sculpin, Cottus cognatus, in Lake Michigan. Copeia 1976: 802–804.Google Scholar
  8. Heard, W.R. 1965. Limnetic cottid larvae and their utilization as food by juvenile sockeye salmon. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 94: 191–193.Google Scholar
  9. Ivlev, V.S. 1966. The biological productivity of waters. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 23: 1727–1759.Google Scholar
  10. Lagler, K.F. 1956. Freshwater fishery biology. Wm.C. Brown Co., Dubuque 421 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Morrow, J.E. 1974. Illustrated keys to the fresh-water fishes of Alaska. Alaska Northwest Publishing Co., Anchorage. 78 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Moyle, P.B. 1977. In defence of sculpins. Fisheries 2: 20–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Otto, R.G. & J. O'Hara Rice. 1977. Responses of freshwater sculpin (Cottus cognatus gracifs) to temperature. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 106: 89–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Petrosky, C.E. & T.F. Waters. 1975. Annual production by the slimy sculpin population in a small Minnesota trout stream. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 104: 237–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ricker, W.E. 1946. Production and utilization of fish populations. Ecol. Mongr. 16: 373–391.Google Scholar
  16. Rounsefell, G.A. 1975. Ecology, utilization, and management of marine fisheries. C.V. Mosby Co., St. Louis. 516 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Scott, W.B. & E.J. Crossman. 1973. Freshwater fishes of Canada. Bull. Fish. Res. Board Can. 184: 1–966.Google Scholar
  18. Symons, P.E.K., J.L. Metcalf & G.D. Harding. 1976. Upper lethal and preferred temperatures of the slimy sculpin, Cottus cognatus. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 33: 180–183.Google Scholar
  19. Van Vliet, W.H. 1964. An ecological study of Cottus cognatus Richardson in northern Saskatchewan. M.Sc. Thesis. Univ. Saskatchewan, Saskatoon 155 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Waters, T.F. 1977. Secondary production in inland waters. Adv. Ecol. Res. 10: 91–164.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr W. Junk Publishers 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael E. McDonald
    • 1
  • Benjamin E. Cuker
    • 1
  • Samuel C. Mozley
    • 1
  1. 1.Zoology DepartmentNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA

Personalised recommendations