Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 36, Issue 3, pp 243–255 | Cite as

Some effects of shark nets in the Natal nearshore environment

  • Sheldon F.J Dudley
  • Geremy Cliff


Protective gillnets (shark nets) have been successful in reducing the frequency of shark attacks on the coast of Natal, South Africa. This is achieved primarily through a reduction in numbers of large sharks. The nets also take a by catch of dolphins, sea turtles, batoids and teleosts. Concern has been expressed over the direct effect of mortalities on the various stocks and also the broader, indirect effects on the inshore system. Catch rates of most shark species declined initially but have shown no trend since the mid-1970s. A first estimate of the reduction in total shark numbers is provided, and factors such as stock identity and net avoidance are discussed. Turtle and teleost stocks do not appear to be threatened by net mortalities but marine mammalogists are investigating the sustainability of catches of two dolphin species. Certain batoids may have declined despite a high release rate, but more data are needed. A published contention that shark netting has resulted in a proliferation of small sharks through reduced predation is re-examined and considered to be exaggerated. Reduced predation on dolphins, as a result of shark netting, is estimated.

Key words

Shark attacks Gillnets CPUE Stock assessment By catch Environmental impact Stomach content Predation Delphinidae Cryptodira Batoidea Teleostei 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References cited

  1. Armstrong, M.J., P. Chapman, S.F.J. Dudley, I. Hampton & P. Malan. 1991. Occurrence and population structure of anchovyEngraulis capensis, pilchardSardinops ocellatus and round herringEtrumeus whiteheadi off the east coast of South Africa. S. Afr. J. mar. Sci. 11: 227–249.Google Scholar
  2. Bass, A.J., J.D.'Abrey & N. Kistnasamy. 1975. Sharks of the east coast of southern Africa. III. The families Carcharhinidae (excludingMustelus andCarcharhinus) and Sphyrnidae. Invest. Rep. oceanogr. Res. Inst. Afr. 38. 100 pp.Google Scholar
  3. Bedford, D.W. 1987. Shark management: a case history — the California pelagic shark and swordfish fishery. pp. 161–171. In: S. Cook.Google Scholar
  4. Castro, J.I. 1987. The position of sharks in marine biological communities; an overview. pp. 11–17. In: S. Cook.Google Scholar
  5. Cliff, G. 1991. Shark attacks on the South African coast between 1960 and 1990. S. Afr. J. Sci. 87: 513–518.Google Scholar
  6. Cliff, G. & S.F.J. Dudley. 1991a. Sharks caught in the protective nets off Natal, South Africa. 4. The bull sharkCarcharhinus leucas Valenciennes. S. Afr. J. mar. Sci. 10: 253–270.Google Scholar
  7. Cliff, G. & S.F.J. Dudley. 1991b. Sharks caught in the protective nets off Natal, South Africa. 5. The Java sharkCarcharhinus amboinensis (Müller & Henle). S. Afr. J. mar. Sci. 11: 443–453.Google Scholar
  8. Cliff, G., S.F.J. Dudley & B. Davis. 1988a. Sharks caught in the protective nets off Natal, South Africa. 1. The sandbar sharkCarcharhinus plumbeus (Nardo). S. Afr. J. mar. Sci. 7: 255–265.Google Scholar
  9. Cliff, G., S.F.J. Dudley & B. Davis. 1988b. An overview of shark catches in Natal's shark nets: 1966 to 1986. pp. 84–90. In: I.A.W. Macdonald & R.J.M. Crawford (ed.) Long-Term Data Series Relating to Southern Africa's Renewable Natural Resources, Rep. S. Afr. natn. scient. Prog. 157.Google Scholar
  10. Cliff, G., S.F.J. Dudley & B. Davis. 1989. Sharks caught in the protective nets off Natal, South Africa. 2. The great white sharkCarcharodon carcharias (Linnaeus). S. Afr. J. mar. Sci. 8: 131–144.Google Scholar
  11. Cliff, G., S.F.J. Dudley & B. Davis. 1990. Sharks caught in the protective nets off Natal, South Africa. 3. The shortfin mako sharkIsurus oxyrinchus Rafinesque. S. Afr. J. mar. Sci. 9: 115–126.Google Scholar
  12. Cockcroft, V.G. 1990. Dolphin catches in the Natal shark nets, 1980 to 1988. S. Afr. J. Wildl. Res. 20 (2): 44–51.Google Scholar
  13. Cockcroft, V.G., G. Cliff & G.J.B. Ross. 1989. Shark predation on Indian Ocean bottlenose dolphinsTursiops truncatus off Natal, South Africa. S. Afr. J. Zool. 24: 305–310.Google Scholar
  14. Cockcroft, V.G. & V.M. Peddemors. 1990. Seasonal distribution and density of common dolphinsDelphinus delphis off the south-east coast of southern Africa. S. Afr. J. mar. Sci. 9: 371–377.Google Scholar
  15. Compagno, L.J.V. 1984a. F.A.O. species catalogue. Vol. 4. Sharks of the world. An annotated and illustrated catalogue of shark species known to date. (1) Hexanchiformes to Lamniformes. F.A.O. Fish. Synop. 125: 1–249.Google Scholar
  16. Compagno, L.J.V. 1984b. F.A.O. species catalogue. Vol. 4. Sharks of the world. An annotated and illustrated catalogue of shark species known to date. (2) Carcharhiniformes. F.A.O. Fish. Synop. 125: 251–655.Google Scholar
  17. Compagno, L.J.V. 1987. Shark attack in South Africa. pp. 134–147. In: J.D. Stevens.Google Scholar
  18. Compagno, L.J.V., D.A. Ebert & M.J. Smale. 1989. Guide to the sharks and rays of Southern Africa. Struik, Cape Town. 160 pp.Google Scholar
  19. Davies, D.H. 1964. About sharks and shark attack. Shuter and Shooter, Pietermaritzburg. 237 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Davis B., G. Cliff & S.F.J. Dudley. 1989. The Natal Sharks Board. pp. 209–213. In: A.I.L. Payne & R.J.M. Crawford.Google Scholar
  21. Gruber, S.H. & C.A. Manire. 1989. Challenge of the chondrichthyans. Chondros 1 (1): 1–3.Google Scholar
  22. Holden, M.J. 1977. Elasmobranchs. pp. 187–215. In: J.A. Gulland.Google Scholar
  23. Hughes, G.R. 1974. The sea turtles of south-east Africa. 1. Status, morphology and distributions. Invest. Rep. oceanogr. Res. Inst. S. Afr. 35. 144 pp.Google Scholar
  24. Hughes, G.R. 1989a. Sea turtles. pp. 230–243. In: A.I.L. Payne & R.J.M. Crawford.Google Scholar
  25. Hughes, G.R. 1989b. Sea turtles and shark nets. Quagga 25: 22.Google Scholar
  26. Kohler, N.E. 1987. Aspects of the feeding ecology of the blue shark,Prionace glauca, in the western North Atlantic. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Rhode Island, Kingston. 163 pp.Google Scholar
  27. Mara, J. 1986. A fisherman's tale. D. Rorke (ed.) Angler Publications and Promotions, Umhlanga Rocks. 92 pp.Google Scholar
  28. Martin, L.K. & G.M. Cailliet. 1988a. Aspects of the reproduction of the bat ray,Myliobatis californica, in central California. Copeia 1988: 754–762.Google Scholar
  29. Martin, L.K. & G.M. Cailliet. 1988b. Age and growth determination of the bat ray,Myliobatis californica Gill, in central California. Copeia 1988: 762–773.Google Scholar
  30. Martin, A.K. & B.W. Flemming. 1988. Physiography, structure and geological evolution of the Natal continental shelf. pp. 11–46. In: E.H. Schumann.Google Scholar
  31. McCracken, P. 1989. The tangled business of shark nets. pp. 18–21. In: J. Gardiner (ed.) Personality, March 27 1989, Republican Press, Durban.Google Scholar
  32. Medved, R.J., C.E. Stillwell & J.G. Casey. 1988. The rate of food consumption of young sandbar sharks (Carcharhinus plumbeus) in Chincoteague Bay, Virginia. Copeia 1988: 956–963.Google Scholar
  33. Myberg, A.A. 1987. Understanding shark behavior. pp. 41–83. In: S. Cook vice, Portland.Google Scholar
  34. Paterson, R.A. 1990. Effects of long-term anti-shark measures on target and non-target species in Queensland, Australia. Biol. Conserv. 52: 147–159.Google Scholar
  35. Richards, H. 1988. Shark nets and the inshore ecosystem. Afr. Wildl. 42: 166–171.Google Scholar
  36. Ricker, W.E. 1975. Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Bull. Fish. Res. Board Can. 191. 382 pp.Google Scholar
  37. Ross, G.J.B., V.G. Cockcroft, D.A. Melton & D.S. Butterworth. 1989. Population estimates for bottlenose dolphinsTursiops truncatus in Natal and Transkei waters. S. Aft. J. mar. Sci. 8: 119–129.Google Scholar
  38. Schmid, T.H., F.L. Murru & F. McDonald. 1990. Feeding habits and growth rates of bull (Carcharhinus leucas (Valenciennes)), sandbar (Carcharhinus plumbeus (Nardo)), sandtiger (Eugomphodus taurus (Rafinesque)) and nurse (Ginglymostoma cirratum (Bonnaterre)) sharks maintained in captivity. J. Aquaricult. aquat. Sci. 5 (4): 100–105.Google Scholar
  39. Smith, J.W. & J.V. Merriner. 1986. Observations on the reproductive biology of the cownose ray,Rhinoptera bonasus, in Chesapeake Bay. U.S. Fish. Bull. 84: 871–877.Google Scholar
  40. Smith, J.W. & J.V. Merriner. 1987. Age and growth, movements and distribution of the cownose ray,Rhinoptera bonasus, in Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries 10: 153–164.Google Scholar
  41. Van Der Elst, R.P. 1979. A proliferation of small sharks in the shore-based Natal sport fishery. Env. Biol. Fish. 4: 349–362.Google Scholar
  42. Van Der Elst, R.P. 1988a. A guide to the common sea fishes of southern Africa (2nd ed.), Struik, Cape Town. 398 pp.Google Scholar
  43. Van Der Elst, R.P. 1988b. Shelf ichthyofauna of Natal. pp. 209–225. In: E.H. Schumann New York.Google Scholar
  44. Van Der Elst, R.P. 1989. Marine recreational angling in South Africa. pp. 164–176. In: A.I.L. Payne & R.J.M. Crawford.Google Scholar
  45. Van Der Elst, R.P. & E. Bullen. 1990. Tagging news 6. Oceanographic Research Institute, Durban. 10 pp.Google Scholar
  46. Wallett, T.S. 1973. Analysis of shark meshing returns off the Natal coast. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Natal, Durban. 117 pp.Google Scholar
  47. Wallett, T.S. 1983. Shark attack and treatment of victims in southern African waters. Struik, Cape Town. 184 pp.Google Scholar
  48. Wetherbee, B.M., S.H. Gruber & E. Cortes. 1990. Diet, feeding habits, digestion, and consumption in sharks, with special reference to the lemon shark,Negaprion brevirostris. pp. 29–47. In: H.L. Pratt, Jr., S.H. Gruber & T. Taniuchi (ed.) Elasmobranchs as Living Resources: Advances in the Biology, Ecology, Systematics, and the Status of the Fisheries, U.S. Dep. Commer., NOAA Tech. Rep. NMFS 90.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sheldon F.J Dudley
    • 1
  • Geremy Cliff
    • 1
  1. 1.Natal Sharks BoardUmhlanga RocksSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations