Sex change in fishes: hypotheses, evidence, and objections

  • Robert R. Warner
Article

Synopsis

Ghiselin's size-advantage hypothesis has been used with considerable success to explain the adaptive significance of sequential hermaphroditism in fishes. If the expected number of offspring produced differs between the sexes with size, then an individual that changes sex can take advantage of these differences and have more offspring than an individual that remains exclusively male or female. Despite its success, the size-advantage hypothesis has been criticized as inadequate or incomplete, and some modifications have made it more consistent with common life-history theories. In general, individuals should change sex when the other sex has a higher reproductive value. Thus individuals may change sex and suffer an initial drop in reproductive success if this enhances their future expectations. The size-advantage model was formalized to identify the important variables that affect selection for sex change. Many of the assumptions made (e.g., a genetically fixed age of sex change) were for mathematical tractability and are not critical to the general premise. While the model can be used to specify the optimal size or age of sex change in a hermaphroditic species, it is necessary to state the factors likely to be affecting sex-specific reproductive values in the particular species in question. Inasmuch as these factors (e.g., mating system, local sex ratios, and size distributions) vary from species to species, the general model cannot and should not include them. For the same reasons, the model was also not intended to describe the precise cues that an animal might use to change sex. Any number of features might be used as a predictor of reproductive value, and the size-advantage model does not require that relative size be the actual criterion utilized. Several aspects of the model require further testing. Perhaps the most important problem is a refinement of the predictions for the occurrence of sex change from male to female.

Key words

Sex allocation Models Hermaphroditism 

References cited

  1. Aldenhoven, J.M. 1986. Different reproductive strategies in a sex-changing coral reef fishCentropyge bicolor (Pomacanthidae). Aust. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 37: 353–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Breitburg, D.L. 1988. Interspecific competition and the abundance of nest sites: factors affecting sexual selection in a temperate goby. Ecology (in press).Google Scholar
  3. Charnov, E.L. 1979a. The genetical evolution of patterns of sexuality: Darwinian fitness. Amer. Nat. 112: 317–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Charnov, E.L. 1979b. Natural selection and sex change in pandalid shrimp: test of a life history theory. Amer. Nat. 113: 715–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Charnov, E.L. 1982. The theory of sex allocation. Princeton University Press, Princeton. 355 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Charnov, E.L. 1986. Size advantage may not always favor sex change. J. Theor. Biology 119: 283–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Charnov. E.L., D. Gotshall & J. Robinson. 1978. Sex ratio: adaptive response to population fluctuations in pandalid shrimp. Science 200: 204–206.Google Scholar
  8. Fishelson, L. 1970. Protogynous sex reversal in the fishAnthias squamipinnis (Teleostei, Anthiidae) regulated by presence or absence of male fish. Nature 227: 90–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fisher, R.A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford. 291 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Freeman, D.C., K.T. Harper & E.L. Charnov. 1980. Sex change in plants: old and new observations and new hypotheses. Oecologia 47: 222–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fricke, H.W. & S. Fricke. 1977. Monogamy and sex change by aggressive dominance in a coral reef fish. Nature 266: 830–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ghiselin, M.T. 1969. The evolution of hermaphroditism among animals. Quart. Rev. Biol. 44: 189–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ghiselin, M.T. 1974. The economy of nature and the evolution of sex. University of California Press, Berkeley. 346 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Hoffman, S.G., M.P. Schildhauer & R.R. Warner. 1985. The costs of changing sex and the ontogeny of males under contest competition for mates. Evolution 39: 915–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jones, G.P. 1981. Spawning-site choice by femalePseudolabrus celidotus (Pisces: Labridae) and its influence on the mating system. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 8: 129–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Leigh, E.G. Jr., E.L. Charnov & R.R. Warner. 1976. Sex ratio, sex change, and natural selection. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 73: 3656–3660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lejeune, P. 1987. The effect of local stock density on social behavior and sex change in the Mediterranean labridCoris julis. Env. Biol. Fish. 18: 135–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Maynard Smith J. 1976. Evolution and the theory of games. Amer. Sci. 64: 41–45.Google Scholar
  19. Moyer, J.T. & A. Nakazono. 1978. Protandrous hermaphroditism in six species of the anemonefish genusAmphiprion in Japan. Japan J. Ichthyol. 25: 101–106.Google Scholar
  20. Moyer, J.T. & M.J. Zaiser. 1984. Early sex change: a possible mating strategy ofCentropyge angelfishes (Pisces: Pomacanthidae) J. Ethol. 2: 63–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Policansky, D. 1982. Sex change in plants and animals. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 13: 471–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Robertson, D.R. 1972. Social control of sex reversal in a coral reef fish. Science 177: 1007–1009.Google Scholar
  23. Robertson, D.R. & J.H. Choat. 1973. Protogynous hermaphroditism and social systems in labrid fish. Proc. 2nd Int. Symp. Coral Reefs 1: 217–224.Google Scholar
  24. Robertson, D.R. & R.R. Warner. 1978. Sexual patterns in the labroid fishes of the western Caribbean, II: The parrotfishes (Scaridae). Smithsonian Cont. Zool. 255: 1–26.Google Scholar
  25. Ross, R.M., G.S. Losey & M. Diamond. 1983. Sex change in a coral-reef fish: dependence of stimulation and inhibition on relative size. Science 221: 574–575.Google Scholar
  26. Shapiro, D.Y. 1979. Social behavior, group structure, and the control of sex reversal in hermaphroditic fish. Adv. Studies Beh. 10: 43–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shapiro, D.Y. 1980. Serial female sex changes after simultaneous removal of males from social groups of a coral reef fish. Science 209: 1136–1137.Google Scholar
  28. Shapiro, D.Y. 1981. Size, maturation, and the social control of sex reversal in the coral reef fishAnthias squamipinnis (Peters). J. Zool. Lond. 193: 105–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shapiro, D.Y. 1983. Distinguishing direct behavioral interactions from visual cues as causes of adult sex change in a coral reef fish. Horm. Beh. 17: 424–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shapiro, D.Y. 1984. Sex reversal and sociodemographic processes in coral reef fishes. pp. 103–118. In: G.W. Potts & R.J. Wootton (ed.) Fish Reproduction, Strategies and Tactics, Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  31. Shapiro, D.Y. 1985. Behavioral influences on the initiation of adult sex change in coral reef fishes. pp. 583–585. In: B. Lofts & W.N. Holmes (ed.) Current Trends in Comparative Endocrinology, University of Hong Kong Press, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  32. Shapiro, D.Y. 1987. Sexual differentiation, social behavior and the evolution of sex change in coral reef fishes. Bioscience 37: 490–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shapiro, D.Y. 1988. Behavioral influences on gene structure and other new ideas concerning sex change in fishes. Env. Biol. Fish. (in press).Google Scholar
  34. Shapiro, D.Y. & R. Lubbock. 1980. Group sex ratio and sex reversal. J. Theor. Biology 82: 411–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Victor, B.C. 1983. Recruitment and the population dynamics of a coral reef fish. Science 219: 419–420.Google Scholar
  36. Warner, R.R. 1975a. The adaptive significance of sequential hermaphroditism in animals Amer. Natur. 109: 61–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Warner, R.R. 1975b. The reproductive biology of the protogynous hermaphroditePimelometopon pulchrum (Pisces: Labridae). U.S. Fish. Bull. 73: 262–283.Google Scholar
  38. Warner, R.R. 1978. The evolution of hermaphroditism and unisexuality in aquatic and terrestrial vertebrates. pp. 78–95. In: E.S. Reese & F.J. Lighter (ed.) Contrasts in Behavior, Wiley Interscience, New York.Google Scholar
  39. Warner, R.R. 1984a. Mating behavior and hermaphroditism in coral reef fishes. American Scientist 72: 128–136.Google Scholar
  40. Warner, R.R. 1984b. Deferred reproduction as a response to sexual selection in a coral reef fish: a test of the life historical consequences. Evolution 38: 148–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Warner, R.R. 1988. Sex change and the size-advantage model. Trends in Ecology and Evolution (in press).Google Scholar
  42. Warner, R.R. & S.G. Hoffman. 1980. Local population size as a determinant of mating system and sexual composition in two tropical reef fishes (Thalassoma spp.). Evolution 34: 508–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Warner, R.R. & P. Lejeune. 1985. Sex change limited by paternal care: a test using four Mediterranean labrid fishes, genusSymphodus. Mar. Biol. 87: 88–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Warner, R.R. & D.R. Robertson. 1978. Sexual patterns in the labroid fishes of the western Caribbean, I: The wrasses (Labridae). Smithsonian Cont. Zool. 254: 1–27.Google Scholar
  45. Warner, R.R., D.R. Robertson & E.G. Leigh, Jr. 1975. Sex change and sexual selection. Science 190: 633–638.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert R. Warner
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations