Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 8, Issue 3–4, pp 279–282

Habitat selection in three species of darters

  • Frank H. McCormick
  • Nevin Aspinwall
Other paper from the conference

Synopsis

The distribution of three species of darters (Percidae) was studied with respect to vegetation and substrate preferences. The distribution of these darters was correlated with presence of vegetation. Quantitative field data were combined with a laboratory evaluation of preference to determine the sensory mechanisms operating in habitat selection.

Keywords

Distribution Vegetation Substrate Etheostoma Vision Olfaction Meramec River Pisces Percidae 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References cited

  1. Ali, M.A., R.A. Ryder & M. Anctil. 1977. Photoreceptors and visual pigments as related to behavioral responses and preferred habitats of perches (Perca spp.) and pikeperches (Stizostedeon spp.). J. Fish. Res. Board Can., 34: 1475–1480.Google Scholar
  2. Ali, M.A. & H.J. Wagner. 1976. Scanning electron microscopy of four teleostean retinas. Rev. Can. Biol. 35: 199–210.Google Scholar
  3. Cherry, D.S., J. Cairns & K.L. Dickson. 1975. Temperatures selected and avoided by fish at various acclimation temperatures. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 32: 485–491.Google Scholar
  4. Conover, W.J. 1971. Practical Nonparametric Statistics. John Wiley & Sons, N.Y. 449 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Hespenheide, H. 1973. Ecological inferences from morphological data. J. Ecol. Morphol. 4: 213–230.Google Scholar
  6. Larrick, S.R., K.L. Dickson, D.S. Cherry & J. Cairns. 1978. Determining fish avoidance of polluted water. Hydrobiologia 61: 257–265.Google Scholar
  7. Levine, J.S. & E.F. MacNichol, Jr. 1979. Visual pigments in teleost fishes: effects for habitat, microhabitat, and behavior on visual systems in evolution. Sens. Proc. 3: 95–131.Google Scholar
  8. Matthews, W.J. & L.G. Hill. 1979. Influence of physicochemical factors on habitat selection in red shiners,Notropis lutrensis. Copeia 1979: 70–81.Google Scholar
  9. Munz, F.W. & W.N. McFarland. 1977. Evolutionary adaptations of fishes to the photic environment. pp 193–274. In: F. Crescitelli (ed.) Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Vol. VII, Part 5, The Visual System in Vertebrates Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Page, L.M. 1977. The lateralis system in darters (Etheostomatini). Copeia 1977: 472–475.Google Scholar
  11. Partridge, L. 1978. Habitat selection. pp. 351–376. In: J.R. Krebs & N.B. Davies (ed.) Behavioral Ecology, Sinauer Assoc., Sunderland.Google Scholar
  12. Pflieger, W.L. 1975. The fishes of Missouri. Missouri Department of Conservation. 343 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Sale, P.F. 1969. Pertinent stimuli for habitat selection in juvenile manini,Acanthurus triostegus sandwichensis. Ecology 50: 616–623.Google Scholar
  14. Sokal, R.R. & F.J. Rohlf. 1969. Biometry. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco. 776 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Ultsch, G.R., R. Boschung & M.J. Ross. 1978. Metabolism, critical oxygen tension, and habitat selection in darters. Ecology 59: 99–107.Google Scholar
  16. Winn, H.E. 1958. Comparative reproductive behavior and ecology of fourteen species of darters (Pisces: Percidae). Ecol. Monogr. 28: 155–192.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr W. Junk Publishers 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank H. McCormick
    • 1
  • Nevin Aspinwall
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologySaint Louis UniversitySt. LouisU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations