Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 109–121 | Cite as

Use of the intertidal zone by fish in Nova Scotia

  • Robert Black
  • Robert J. Miller
Full paper

Synopsis

In Nova Scotia the annual harvest of the intertidal seaweed Ascophyllum nodosum exceeds 20 000 tons. This study investigated the possible impact of removal of the seaweed on intertidal abundance of fishes and their gut contents. At sites near Lower Argyle, Nova Scotia, absolute abundance of fish in small areas with Ascophyllum removed and intact was determined with pop-up seines. Gut contents were investigated from fish collected with the seines and with trammel nets. Number and weight of fish were not significantly different between cleared and intact areas and averaged 4.6 individuals and 160 g per 400 m2 during June to October. Cunner and sculpins had more food in their guts when leaving than when entering the intertidal, but only cunner had more food in their stomachs when leaving intact areas than when leaving cleared areas. Most fish captured in the intertidal were small (< 15 cm) and of no commercial value, and the numbers of commercial species were too low to be of much value. Numbers of fish in the intertidal was significantly lower than in the shallow subtidal. This study provided no evidence for adverse effects of the removal of patches of Ascophyllum on fishes.

Key words

Abundance Stomach-contents Gadidae Labridae Cottidae Pleuronectidae Ascophyllum 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References cited

  1. Anon. 1981. Pilot survey of the world seaweed industry and trade. International Trade Center UNCTAD/GATT, Geneva. 111 pp.Google Scholar
  2. Anon. 1985. 1984 — Scotia-Fundy Region statistics. Can. Dept. Fisheries and Oceans, Halifax, Fishery News, 5: 6.Google Scholar
  3. Choat, J.H. & P.D. Kingett. 1982. The influence of fish predation on the abundance cycles of an algal turf invertebrate fauna. Oecologia 54: 88–95.Google Scholar
  4. Grossman, G.D. 1986. Food resource partitioning in a rocky intertidal fish assemblage. J. Zool. (Lond.) (B) 1: 317–332.Google Scholar
  5. Jansson, B.O., G. Aneer & S. Nellbring. 1985. Spatial and temporal distribution of the demersal fish fauna in a Baltic archipelago as estimated by SCUBA census. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 23: 31–43.Google Scholar
  6. Keser, M., R.L. Vadas & B.R. Larson. 1981. Regrowth of Ascophyllum nodosum and Fucus vesiculosus under various harvesting regimes in Maine, U.S.A. Bot. Mar. 24: 29–38.Google Scholar
  7. Larson, R.J. & E.E. DeMartini, 1984. Abundance and vertical distribution of fishes in a cobble-bottom kelp forest off San Onofre, California. U.S. Fish. Bull. 82: 37–53.Google Scholar
  8. Leaman, B.M. 1980. The ecology of fishes in British Columbia kelp beds. I. Barkely Sound Nereocystis beds. Ministry of Environment, Province of British Columbia, Fish. Dev. Rep. No. 22. 100 pp.Google Scholar
  9. MacDonald, J.S., M.J. Dadswell, R.G. Appy, G.D. Melvin & D.A. Methuen. 1984. Fishes, fish assemblages and their seasonal movements in the lower Bay of Fundy and Passamaquoddy Bay, Canada. U.S. Fish. Bull. 82: 121–139.Google Scholar
  10. Moreno, C.A. & H.F. Jara. 1984. Ecological studies on fish fauna associated with Macrocystis pyrifera belts in the south of Fueguian Islands, Chile. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 15: 99–107.Google Scholar
  11. Nash, R.D.M. 1986. Diel fluctuation of a shallow water fish community in the inner Oslofjord, Norway. P.S.Z.N.I. Mar. Ecol. 7: 219–232.Google Scholar
  12. Quast, J.C. 1968a. Effects of kelp harvesting on the fishes of the kelp beds. Calif. Dept. Fish and Game Fish. Bull. 139: 57–79.Google Scholar
  13. Quast, J.C. 1968b. Observation on the food of the kelp bed fishes. Calif. Dept. Fish and Game Fish. Bull. 139: 109–142.Google Scholar
  14. Quast, J.C. 1971. Fish fauna of the rocky inshore zone. In: W.J. North (ed.) The Biology of the Giant Kelp Beds, Nova Hedwigia Suppl. 32: 481–507.Google Scholar
  15. Sharp, G.J. 1970. Observations of macroalgal populations on the oil polluted shores of Chedabucto Bay. Nova Scotia Dept. Fish., Halifax. 3 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Sharp, G.J. 1981. An assessment of Ascophyllum nodosum harvesting methods in southwestern Nova Scotia. Can. Tech. Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci. No. 1012. 28 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Simenstad, C.A., J.S. Isakson & R.A. Nakatani. 1977. Marine fish communities of Amchitka Island, Alaska. pp. 451–492. In: M.L. Merritt & R.G. Fuller (ed.) The Environment of Amchitka Island, TID 26712, Nat. Tech. Inform. Serv., U.S. Dept. Commerce, Springfield.Google Scholar
  18. Smith, R.E. & R.H. Louchs. 1980. A literature and photoassessment of the marine plant biomass of eastern Canada. Report for the Atlantic Regional Laboratory of the National Research Council of Canada, Halifax. 240 pp.Google Scholar
  19. Sokal, R.R. & F.J. Rohlf, 1969. Biometry. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco. 776 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Tyler, A.V. 1971. Surges of winter flounder, Pseudopleuronectes americanus, into the intertidal zone. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 28: 1727–1732.Google Scholar
  21. Underwood, A.J., 1981. Techniques of analysis of variance in experimental marine biology and ecology. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Ann. Rev. 19: 513–605.Google Scholar
  22. Winer, B.J. 1971. Statistical principles in experimental design. McGraw-Hill, Sydney. 907 pp.Google Scholar
  23. Wells, B., D.H. Steele & A.V. Tyler. 1973. Intertidal feeding of winter flounder (Pseudopleuronectes americanus) in the Bay of Fundy. J. Fish Res. Board Can. 30: 1374–1378.Google Scholar
  24. Yoshiyama, R.M. 1980. Food habits of three species of intertidal sculpins (Cottidae) in central California. Copeia 1980: 515–525.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Black
    • 1
  • Robert J. Miller
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyThe University of Western AustraliaNedlandsAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Fisheries and OceansHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations