Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 195–202 | Cite as

Risk of predation, hydrodynamic efficiency and their influence on school structure

  • Mark V. Abrahams
  • Patrick W. Colgan
Full paper


Laboratory studies were conducted on 15 schools of blackchin shiners, Notropis heterodon, to determine if they altered their structure in response to changing environmental demands. The hypothesis tested was that fish schools should sacrifice a flat, hydrodynamically efficient structure in favour of an unobstructed visual field in the presence of a predator by staggering in the vertical plane. Ten schools were exposed for two weeks to a simple environment with only a current. For the next two-week period a predator was added. Five control schools were exposed to the simple environment for both two-week periods. Six of the ten treated schools increased their staggering in the vertical dimension as predicted while none of the control schools changed. This result was suggestive that hydrodynamic advantages were sacrificed. Respirometer experiments indicated these fish were capable of achieving some hydrodynamic benefits from schooling but these benefits may be a function of fish size.


Fish schools Predator avoidance Predator detection School function Schooling Swimming efficiency 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References cited

  1. Beamish, F.W.H. 1966. Swimming endurance of some northwest Atlantic fishes. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 2: 341–347.Google Scholar
  2. Belyayev, V.V. & G.V. Zuyev. 1969. Hydrodynamic hypothesis of school formation in fishes. J. Ichthyol. 9: 578–584.Google Scholar
  3. Cullen, J.M., E. Shaw & H.A. Baldwin. 1965. Methods for measuring the three-dimensional structure of fish schools. Anim. Behav. 13: 534–543.Google Scholar
  4. Eggers, D.M. 1976. Theoretical effect of schooling by planktivorous fish predators on rate of prey consumption. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 33: 1964–1971.Google Scholar
  5. Heiligenberg, W. 1974. Processes governing behavioural states of readiness. pp. 173–200. In: D.S. Lehrman, J.S. Rosenblatt, R.A. Hinde & E. Shaw (ed.) Advances in the Study of Behaviour, Vol. 5. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Heczko, E.J. & B.H. Seghers. 1981. Effects of alarm substance on schooling in the common shiner (Notropis cornutus, Cyprinidae). Env. Biol. Fish. 6: 25–29.Google Scholar
  7. Olson, F.C.W. 1964. The survival value of fish schooling. J. Cons. Perm. Int. Explor. Mer. 29: 115–116.Google Scholar
  8. Partridge, B.L., J. Johansson & J. Kalish. 1983. The structure of schools of giant bluefin tuna in Cape Cod Bay. Env. Biol. Fish. 9: 253–262.Google Scholar
  9. Partridge, B.L. & T.J. Pitcher. 1979. Evidence against a hydrodynamic function for fish schools. Nature 279: 418–419.Google Scholar
  10. Pitcher, T.J., A.E. Magurran & I.J. Winfield. 1982. Fish in larger shoals find food faster. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 10: 149–151.Google Scholar
  11. Shlaifer, A. 1938. Studies in mass physiology: effect of numbers upon the oxygen consumption and locomotor activity of Carassius auratus. Physiol. Zool. 11: 408–424.Google Scholar
  12. Siegel, S. 1956. Nonparametric statistics for the behaviour sciences. McGraw-Hill, London. 312 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Weihs, D. 1973. Hydromechanics of fish schooling. Nature 241: 290–291.Google Scholar
  14. Weihs, D. 1975. Some hydrodynamical aspects of fish schooling. pp. 703–718. In: T. Wu, C.J. Brokaw & C. Brennen (Ed.) Swimming and Flying in Nature, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr. W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark V. Abrahams
    • 1
  • Patrick W. Colgan
    • 1
  1. 1.Biology DepartmentQueen's UniversityKingstonCanada

Personalised recommendations