Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

What about theory? The consequences on a widened perspective of social theory

  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the leading debates in social sciences concerns research design. However, in comparative politics, the predominant way conducting research misses out crucial aspects that are central to social theory. This article shows how method and empirical research are highly dependent on the definition of theory. Arguing that theory should not only give an explanation of the social phenomena in question but should also show how this relationship is constructed, this article outlines the consequence of such a perspective, namely that the collection of data should reflect both macro and micro perspectives and the analyses of data should be carried out using mixed methods. In conclusion, such an integrated framework is the most appropriate way to give valuable theoretical feedback, either by examination and revision of already established theories or by a contribution to the construction of new theory in the social sciences. It is important, though, that such a framework is applied in a systematized way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acemoglu D., Johnson S., Robinson J.A., Yared P.: Reevaluating the modernization hypothesis. J. Mon. Econ. 56, 1043–1058 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adcock R., Collier D.: Measurements validity: a shared standard for qualitative and quantitative research. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 95, 529–546 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almond G.A., Verba S.: The Civic Culture. Little, Brown and Company, Boston (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Almond G.A., Powell G.B. Jr: Comparative Politics: A Developmental Approach. Little, Brown and Company, Boston (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, R.M., Katz, J.N. (eds.): Special issue: natural experiments in political science. Polit. Anal. 17 (2009)

  • Archer M.S.: Culture and Agency: The Place of Culture in Social Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle: Politics. Dover Publications, Dover (2000)

  • Aslaksen S.: Oil and democracy: more than a cross-country correlation?. J. Peace Res. 47, 421–431 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aus J.P.: Conjunctural causation in comparative case-oriented research. Qual. Quant. 43, 173–183 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro R.J.: Determinants of democracy. J. Polit. Econ. 107, 158–183 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennet, A.: Beyond Hempel and back to Hume: causal mechanisms and causal explanation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia (2003)

  • Boix C., Stokes S.C.: Endogenous democratization. World Polit. 55, 517–549 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen K.: World system position, dependency, and democracy: the cross-national evidence. Am. Sociol. Rev. 48, 468–479 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen K.A., Jackman R.W.: Political democracy and the size distribution of income. Am. Sociol. Rev. 50, 438–457 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P.: Practical Reasons: On the Theory of Action. Stanford University Press, Stanford (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, H.E., Collier, D. (eds): Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brannen J.: Mixing methods: the entry of qualitative and quantitative approaches into the research process. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 8, 173–184 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkhart R.E., Lewis-Beck M.S.: Comparative democracy: the economic development thesis. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 88, 903–910 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chirot D.: Social Change in the Modern Era. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, San Diego (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman J.: Social theory, social research, and a theory of action. Am. J. Sociol. 91, 1309–1335 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier D., Mahon J.E. Jr.: Conceptual ‘stretching’ revisited: adapting categories in comparative analysis. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 87, 845–855 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coppedge M.: Thin concepts and theories: combining large N and small in comparative politics. Comp. Polit. 31, 465–476 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coppedge, M.: Explaining democratic deterioration in Venezuela through nested induction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, 2–5 September (2001)

  • Dahl R.A.: Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. Yale University Press, New Haven (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Denk T.: Comparative multilevel analysis: proposal for a methodology. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 13, 29–39 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch K.W.: The Nerves of Government: Models of Political Communication and Control. The Free Press, New York (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond L.: Economic development and democracy reconsidered. Am. Behav. Sci. 35, 450–499 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downs A.: An Economic Theory of Democracy. Harper and Row, New York (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton D.: Framework for Political Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, M., Haugerud, A. (eds): The Anthropology of Development and Globalization: From Classical Political Economy to Contemporary. Blackwell, Malden (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster J.: Explaining Social Behavior: More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Falleti T.G., Lynch J.F.: Context and causal mechanisms in political analysis. Comp. Polit. Stud. 42, 1143–1166 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasiorowski M.J.: Economic dependence and political democracy: a cross-national study. Comp. Polit. Stud. 20, 489–515 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerring J.: What is a case study and what is it good for?. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 98, 341–354 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerring J.: Causation: a unified framework for the social sciences. J. Theor. Polit. 17, 163–198 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerring J.: Review article: the mechanismic worldview: thinking inside the box. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 38, 161–179 (2007a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerring J.: Case Study and Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerring J.: Causal mechanisms: yes, but..... Comp. Polit. Stud. 43, 1499–1526 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens A.: The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. University of California Press, Berkeley (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gnosh B.N.: Dependency Theory Revisited. Ashgate Publishing, Farnham (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Goertz G.: Social Science Concepts: A User’s Guide. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadenius A.: Democracy and Development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson B.: Wither qualitative/quantitative? Grounds for methodological convergence. Qual. Quant. 42, 97–111 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedström P.: Dissecting the Social: On the Principles of Analytical Sociology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hedström, P., Bearman, P. (eds): The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedström, P., Swedberg, R. (eds): Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory. Cambridge University Press, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedström P., Ylikoski P.: Causal mechanisms in the social sciences. Ann. Rev. Sociol 36, 49–67 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hume D.: Om förståndet. Thales, Stockholm (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Inkeles A.: Participant citizenship in six developing. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 63, 1120–1141 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman R.R., Chernotsky H.I., Geller D.S.: A preliminary test of the theory of dependency. Comp. Polit. 7, 303–330 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King G., Keohane R.O., Verba S.: Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn T.: The Structures of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Leech N.L., Onwuegbuzie A.J.: A typology of mixed methods research designs. Qual. Quant. 43, 265–275 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner D.: The Passing of Traditional Society. The Free Press of Glencoe, New York (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman E.S.: Nested analysis as a mixed-method strategy for comparative research. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 99, 435–452 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lidén G.: Från demokrati till e-demokrati: En jämförande studie av demokratiutveckling i det moderna samhället. Doctoral dissertation, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall

  • Lijphart A.: Comparative politics and the comparative method. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 65, 682–693 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipset S.M.: Some social requisites of democracy. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 53, 69–105 (1959)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipset S.M.: Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. Doubleday & Company, Garden City (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liska A.E.: The significance of aggregate dependent variables and contextual independent variables for linking macro and micro theories. Soc. Psychol. Q. 53, 292–301 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N.: Social Systems. Stanford University Press, Stanford (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney J.: Beyond correlational analysis: recent innovations in theory and method. Sociol. For. 16, 575–593 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney J.: Qualitative methodology and comparative politics. Comp. Polit. Stud. 40, 122–144 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney J.: Toward a unified theory of causality. Comp. Polit. Stud. 41, 412–436 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney J.: After KKV: the new methodology of qualitative research. World Polit. 62, 120–147 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney J., Snyder R.: Rethinking agency and structure in the study of regime change. Stud. Comp. Int. Dev. 34, 3–32 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney J., Goertz G.: A tale of two cultures: contrasting quantitative and qualitative research. Polit. Anal. 14, 227–249 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz R.: Mechanisms in the analysis of social macro-phenomena. Philos. Soc. Sci. 34, 237–259 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton R.K.: Social Theory and Social Structure. Free Press, Glencoe (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan D.L.: Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. J. Mix. Methods Res. 1, 48–76 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onwuegbuzie A.J., Leech N.L.: On becoming a pragmatic researcher: the importance of combining quantitative and qualitative research methodologies. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 8, 375–387 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons T.: The professions and social structure. Soc. Forces 17, 456–467 (1939)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters B.G.: Comparative Politics: Theory and Methods. Palgrave, Houndmills (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper K.R.: The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Routledge, London (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski A., Teune H.: The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. Wiley–Interscience, New York (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski A., Alvarez M.E., Cheibub J.A., Limongi F.: Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well Being in the World, 1950–1990. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ragin C.C.: The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. University of Californa Press, Berkeley (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin C.C.: Fuzzy-Set Social Science. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer G.: Sociological Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross M.L.: Does oil hinder democracy?. World Polit. 53, 325–361 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sale J.E.M., Lohfeld L.H., Brazil K.: Revisiting the quantitative–qualitative debate: implications for mixed-method resarch. Qual. Quant. 36, 43–53 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sartori G.: Concept misformation in comparative politics. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 64, 1033–1053 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sartori G.: Social Science Concepts: A Systematic Analysis. Sage, Beverly Hills (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • Seawright, J.: Qualitative comparative analysis vis-a-vis regression. Paper presented at the 2004 meetings of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, September (2004)

  • Seawright J., Gerring J.: Case selection techniques in case study research. Polit. Res. Q. 61, 294–308 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon H.A.: Models of Man. Wiley, New York (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel G.: The Metropolis and Mental Life: The Sociology of Georg Simmel. Free Press, New York (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarrow S.: Bridging the quantitative–qualitative divide. In: Brady, H.E., Collier, D. (eds) Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, pp. 171–180. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein I.: The Modern World-System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. Academic, New York (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber M.: Max Weber on the Methodology of the Social Sciences. Free Press, Glencoe (1949)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Social Sciences, Mid Sweden University, 851 70, Sundsvall, Sweden

    Gustav Lidén

Authors
  1. Gustav Lidén
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gustav Lidén.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lidén, G. What about theory? The consequences on a widened perspective of social theory. Qual Quant 47, 213–225 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9512-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9512-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation