Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder Do Not Preferentially Attend to Biological Motion

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Preferential attention to biological motion can be seen in typically developing infants in the first few days of life and is thought to be an important precursor in the development of social communication. We examined whether children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) aged 3–7 years preferentially attend to point-light displays depicting biological motion. We found that children with ASD did not preferentially attend to biological motion over phase-scrambled motion, but did preferentially attend to a point-light display of a spinning top rather than a human walker. In contrast a neurotypical matched control group preferentially attended to the human, biological motion in both conditions. The results suggest a core deficit in attending to biological motion in ASD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2006). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4e., text rev. (DSM-IV-TR). Washington, DC: APA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annaz, D., Remington, A., Milne, E., Coleman, M., Campbell, R., Thomas, M. S. C., et al. (2010). Development of motion processing in children with autism. Developmental Science, 13(6), 826–838.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. P., Dittrich, W. H., Gemmell, A. J., & Young, A. W. (2004). Emotion perception from dynamic and static body expressions in point-light and full-light displays. Perception, 33(6), 717–746.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, R., Turner, L. M., Smoski, M. J., Pozdol, S. L., & Stone, W. L. (2003). Visual recognition of biological motion is impaired in children with autism. Psychological science, 14(2), 151–157.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cassia, V. M. (2004). Can a nonspecific bias toward top-heavy patterns explain newborns’ Face preference? Psychological Science, 15(6), 379–383.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Castelli, F., Frith, C., Happé, F., & Frith, U. (2002). Autism, asperger syndrome and brain mechanisms for the attribution of mental states to animated shapes. Brain, 125(8), 1839–1849.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chawarska, K., Klin, A., & Volkmar, F. R. (2008). Autism Spectrum Disorders in Infantsand Toddlers: Diagnosis, Assessment and Treatment Guildford Press.

  • Cook, J., Saygin, A. P., Swain, R., & Blakemore, S. J. (2009). Reduced sensitivity to minimum-jerk biological motion in autism spectrum conditions. Neuropsychologia, 47(14), 3275–3278.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, G., Meltzoff, A. N., Osterling, J., Rinaldi, J., & Brown, E. (1998). Children with autism fail to orient to naturally occurring social stimuli. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 28(6), 479–485.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, G., Toth, K., Abbott, R., Osterling, J., Munson, J., Estes, A., et al. (2004). Early social attention impairments in Autism: Social orienting, joint attention, and attention to distress. Developmental Psychology, 40(2), 271–283.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, G., Webb, S. J., Wijsman, E., Schellenberg, G., Estes, A., Munson, J., et al. (2005). Neurocognitive and electrophysiological evidence of altered face processing in parents of children with autism: Implications for a model of abnormal development of social brain circuitry in autism. Development and Psychopathology, 17(3), 679–697.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L., Dunn, L., Whetton, C., & Burley, J. (1997). British Picture Vocabulary Scale II: Windsor: NEFR-Nelson.

  • Elliot, C. D., Smith, P., & McCulloch, K. (1997). British Ability Scales II: Windsor: NFER-Nelson.

  • Farroni, T., Csibra, G., Simion, F., & Johnson, M. H. (2002). Eye contact detection in humans from birth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(14), 9602–9605.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, R., & McDaniel, C. (1982). The perception of biological motion by human infants. Science, 218(4571), 486–487.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frith, U. (2001). Mind blindness and the brain in autism. Neuron, 32(6), 969–979.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (1999). Interacting minds—A biological basis. Science, 286(5445), 1692–1695.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grelotti, D. J., Gauthier, I., & Schultz, R. T. (2002). Social interest and the development of cortical face specialization: What autism teaches us about face processing. Developmental Psychobiology, 40(3), 213–225.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herrington, J. D., Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S. J., Singh, K. D., Bullmore, E. T., Brammer, M., et al. (2007). The role of MT +/V5 during biological motion perception in Asperger Syndrome: An fMRI study. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 1(1), 14–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubert, B., Wicker, B., Moore, D. G., Monfardini, E., Duverger, H., Da Fonséca, D., et al. (2007). Brief report: recognition of emotional and non-emotional biological motion in individuals with autistic spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37(7), 1386–1392.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, A., Pinto, J., & Shiffrar, M. (2004). Experience, context, and the visual perception of human movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(5), 822–835.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, G. (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception and Psychophysics, 14(2), 201–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. H. (2005). Subcortical face processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(10), 766–774.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. H., Dziurawiec, S., Ellis, H., & Morton, J. (1991). Newborns’ preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline. Cognition, 40(1–2), 1–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. H., & Horn, G. (1988). Development of filial preferences in dark-reared chicks. Animal Behaviour, 36(3), 675–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., Swettenham, J., Happé, F., Marsden, A., Tregay, J., Baird, G., et al. (Submitted). Visual motion processing in autism spectrum disorders: exploring the profile of ability across a hierarchy of tasks.

  • Jordan, H., Reiss, J. E., Hoffman, J. E., & Landau, B. (2002). Intact perception of biological motion in the face of profound spatial deficits: Williams syndrome. Psychological Science, 13(2), 162–167.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, M. D., Delmolino, L., Tanaka, J. W., & Shiffrar, M. (2010a). Comparison of visual sensitivity to human and object motion in autism spectrum disorder. Autism Research, 3(4), 191–195.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, M. D., Hudac, C. M., Shultz, S., Su Mei, L., Cheung, C., Berkena, A. M., et al. (2010b). Neural signatures of autism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(49), 21223–21228.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klin, A., & Jones, W. (2008). Altered face scanning and impaired recognition of biological motion in a 15-month-old infant with autism: REPORT. Developmental Science, 11(1), 40–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klin, A., Lin, D. J., Gorrindo, P., Ramsay, G., & Jones, W. (2009). Two-year-olds with autism orient to non-social contingencies rather than biological motion. Nature, 459(7244), 257–261.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtensteiger, J., Loenneker, T., Bucher, K., Martin, E., & Klaver, P. (2008). Role of dorsal and ventral stream development in biological motion perception. NeuroReport, 19(18), 1763–1767.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, C., Risi, S., Lambrecht, L., Cook, E. H., Leventhal, B. L., DiLavore, P. C., et al. (2000). The autism diagnostic observation schedule-generic: A standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorder, 30(3), 205–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loula, F., Prasad, S., Harber, K., & Shiffrar, M. (2005). Recognizing people from their movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(1), 210–220.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D. G., Hobson, R. P., & Lee, A. (1997). Components of person perception: An investigation with autistic, non-autistic retarded and typically developing children and adolescents. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15(4), 401–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neri, P., Morrone, M. C., & Burr, D. C. (1998). Seeing biological motion. Nature, 395(6705), 894–896.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • New, J. J., Schultz, R. T., Wolf, J., Niehaus, J. L., Klin, A., German, T. C., et al. (2010). The scope of social attention deficits in autism: Prioritized orienting to people and animals in static natural scenes. Neuropsychologia, 48(1), 51–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Osterling, J., & Dawson, G. (1994). Early recognition of children with autism: A study of first birthday home videotapes. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24(3), 247–257.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ozonoff, S., Macari, S., Young, G. S., Goldring, S., Thompson, M., & Rogers, S. J. (2008). Atypical object exploration at 12 months of age is associated with autism in a prospective sample. Autism, 12(5), 457–472.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parron, C., Da Fonseca, D., Santos, A., Moore, D. G., Monfardini, E., & Deruelle, C. (2008). Recognition of biological motion in children with autistic spectrum disorders. Autism, 12(3), 261–274.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pelphrey, K. A., & Carter, E. J. (2008). Brain mechanisms for social perception: Lesons from Autism and Typical development. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1145, 283–299.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pollick, F. E., Kay, J. W., Heim, K., & Stringer, R. (2005). Gender recognition from point-light walkers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(6), 1247–1265.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pyles, J. A., Garcia, J. O., Hoffman, D. D., & Grossman, E. D. (2007). Visual perception and neural correlates of novel ‘biological motion’. Vision Research, 47(21), 2786–2797.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saygin, A. P. (2007). Superior temporal and premotor brain areas necessary for biological motion perception. Brain, 130(9), 2452–2461.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, R. T. (2005). Developmental deficits in social perception in autism: The role of the amygdala and fusiform face area. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, 23(2-3 SPEC. ISS.), 125–141.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simion, F., Regolin, L., & Bulf, H. (2008). A predisposition for biological motion in the newborn baby. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(2), 809–813.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swettenham, J., Baron-Cohen, S., Cox, A., Baird, G., Drew, A., Charman, T., et al. (1998). The frequency and distribution of spontaneous attention shifts between social and nonsocial stimuli in autistic, typically developing, and nonautistic developmentally delayed infants. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39(5), 747–753.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vallortigara, G., & Regolin, L. (2006). Gravity bias in the interpretation of biological motion by inexperienced chicks. Current Biology, 16(8).

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by an E.S.R.C. Grant (RES 000 23 1148) awarded to John Swettenham, Elizabeth Milne and Ruth Campbell at University College London. We are gratefully acknowledge the efforts of staff and pupils at schools and nurseries in Aberdeen who participated in the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Psychology and Language Science, Department of Developmental Sciences, University College London, Chandler House, 2 Wakefield Street, London, WC1N 1PF, UK

    Dagmara Annaz, Mike Coleman & John Swettenham

  2. Division of Psychology and Language Science, Department of Human Communication Science, Deafness, Cognition and Language Research Centre, University College London, Chandler House, 2 Wakefield Street, London, WC1N 1PF, UK

    Ruth Campbell

  3. Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK

    Elizabeth Milne

Authors
  1. Dagmara Annaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ruth Campbell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mike Coleman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Elizabeth Milne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. John Swettenham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Swettenham.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Annaz, D., Campbell, R., Coleman, M. et al. Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder Do Not Preferentially Attend to Biological Motion. J Autism Dev Disord 42, 401–408 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-011-1256-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-011-1256-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation