Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to stress the importance of pragmatic arguments if we are to reach overlapping consensuses across cultural and disciplinary borders. An analytical distinction is made between, on the one hand, arguments based on socio-political or philosophical presuppositions, and on the other hand, pragmatic arguments. The latter are (as far as possible) detached from culture-specific or disciplinary presuppositions. I will mainly focus on the issue of regulation and surveillance on the Internet, and put forward a selection of pragmatic arguments for why widespread regulation and surveillance ought to be avoided. These arguments are intended to reach the same conclusion as arguments that are based on socio-political and philosophical presuppositions, with the aim of creating overlapping consensuses.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
T. Dinev, M. Bellotto, P. Hart, V. Russo, I. Serra, and C.␣Colautti. Internet Users’ Privacy Concerns and Beliefs About Government Surveillance – An Exploratory Study of Differences between Italy and the United States. Journal of Global Information Management, 14(4): 57–93, 2006
L. Floridi (1999) Information Ethics: On the Philosophical Foundation of Computer Ethics. Ethics and Information Technology 1:37–56
L. Floridi (2002) On the Intrinsic Value of Information Objects and the Infosphere. Ethics and Information Technology 4:287–304
K. Gorniak-Kocikowska (1996) The Computer Revolution and the Problem of Global Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 2:177–190
L.P. Hartman. The Rights and Wrongs of Workplace Snooping. Journal of Business Strategy, 19: 16–20, 1998
G. Huston (2000) The Future for TCP. The Internet Protocol Journal 3(3):2–26
M. Levander. Singapore to Relax Censorship Laws as It Seeks to Expand Internet Access. Wall Street Journal, September 1: A18, 1996
B.G. Norton (2000) The Cultural Approach to Conservation Biology. In: J. Benson (ed) Environmental Ethics: An Introduction with Readings. Routledge, New York
J. Rawls (1996) Political Liberalism. Colombia University Press, New York
L. Solum and M. Chung. The Layers Principle: Internet Architecture and the Law. Public Law and Legal Theory␣Research Paper 55, University of San Diego School of Law [Retrieved October 1, 2004, from http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=416263]
C. Sunstein (2001) Republic.com. Princeton University Press, Princeton
H. Tavani (2002) The uniqueness debate in computer ethics: What exactly is at issue, and why does it matter? Ethics and Information Technology 4: 37–54
The Congressional-Executive Commission on China. Freedom of Expression, Speech, and the Press [Retrieved September 10, 2005, from http://www.cecc.gov/pages/virtualAcad/exp/]
J. Wang. The Internet and Ecommerce in China: Challenge of the WTO. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Advances in Infrastructure for e-Business, e-Education, e-Science, e-Medicine on the Internet, 2003 [Retrieved October 5, 2005, from http://galeb.etf.bg. ac.yu/∼vm/cd1/papers/93.pdf ]
Wikipedia. Blocking of Wikipedia in Mainland China [Retrieved 19 November, 2005, from http://en.wikipedia. org/wiki/Blocking_of_Wikipedia_in_mainland_China]
Acknowledgements
I would like to express my gratitude to Kristian Skagen Ekeli, Charles Ess and Luciano Floridi for their invaluable feedback, in addition to all participants at the ``Bridging Cultures'' workshop at NTNU, June 2005.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Søraker, J.H. The role of pragmatic arguments in computer ethics. Ethics Inf Technol 8, 121–130 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-006-9119-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-006-9119-x