Abstract
This study, conducted in the United States, investigated secondary mathematics teachers’ concept definitions, mathematical understanding, and pedagogical content knowledge of slope. Surveys were collected from 18 preservice and 21 inservice teachers; 8 teachers from each group were also interviewed. Geometric ratios dominated teachers’ concept definitions of slope. Problems involving the recognition of parameters, the interpretation of graphs, and rate of change challenged teachers’ thinking. Teachers’ descriptions of classroom instruction included physical situations more often than functional situations. Results suggest that mathematics teacher education programs need to specifically address slope as a fundamental concept, emphasising its connection to the concept of function.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Azcarate, C. (1992). Estudio de los esquemas conceptuales y de los perfiles de unos alumnos de segundo de bup en relacion con el concepto de pendiente de una recta [A study of the conceptual schemes and the profiles of some BUP students in relation to the concept of the slope gradient].Epsilon, 24, 9–22.
Barr, G. (1980). Graphs, gradients and intercepts.Mathematics in School, 9 (1), 5–6.
Barr, G. (1981). Some student ideas on the concept of gradient.Mathematics in School, 10(1), 14–17.
Bell, A., Janvier, C. (1981). The interpretation of graphs representing situations.For the Learning of Mathematics, 2(1), 34–42.
Cooney, T. J. (1994). Teacher education as an exercise in adaptation. In D. B. Aichele (Ed.),Professional development for teachers of mathematics (pp. 9–22). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Day, R. P. (1995). Using functions to make mathematical connections. In P. A. House & A. F. Coxford (Eds.),Connecting mathematics across the curriculum (pp.54–64). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.),Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119–161). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Even, R. (1993). Subject-matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: Prospective secondary teachers and the function concept.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24, 94–116.
Fey, J. T. (1990). Quantity. In L. A. Steen (Ed.),On the shoulders of giants (pp. 61–94). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Fey, J. T. & Good, R. A. (1985). Rethinking the sequence and priorities of high school mathematics curricula. In C. R. Hirsch (Ed.),The secondary school mathematics curriculum (pp. 43–52). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Hart, K. M. (Ed.) (1981).Children’s understanding of mathematics: 11–16. London: John Murray.
Hiebert, J., & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis. In J. Hiebert (Ed.),Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics (pp. 1–28). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Heller, P. M., Post, T. R., Behr, M., Lesh, R. (1990). Qualitative and numerical reasoning about fractions and rates by seventh- and eighth-grade students.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 388–402.
Hughes-Hallett, D., Osgood, B. G., Gleason, A. M., Pasquale, A., Gordon, S. P., Tecosky-Feldman, J., Lomen, D. O., Thrash, J. B., Lovelock, D., Thrash, K. R., McCallum, W. G., Tucker, T. W. (1992).Calculus. New York, NY: John Wiley.
Janvier, C. (1981). Use of situations in mathematics education.Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 113–122.
Janvier, C. (1987). Translation processes in mathematics education. In C. Janvier (Ed.),Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 27–32). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kaput, J. J., & West, M. M. (1994). Missing-value proportional reasoning problems: Factors affecting informal reasoning patterns. In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.),The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp. 235–287). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Karplus, R., Pulos, S., & Stage, E. K. (1983). Early adolescents’ proportional reasoning in “rate” problems.Educational Studies in Mathematics, 14, 219–233.
Kerslake, D. (1981). Graphs. In K. Hart (Ed.),Children’s understanding of mathematics: 11–16 (pp. 120–136). London: John Murray.
Lamon, S. J. (1995). Ratio and proportion: Elementary didactical phenomenology. In J. T. Sowder & B. P. Schappelle (Eds.),Providing a foundation for teaching mathematics in the middle grades (pp. 167–198). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Livingston, C., Borko, H. (1990). High school mathematics review lessons: Expert-novice distinctions.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 372–387.
Lloyd, G. M., Wilson, M. (1998). Supporting innovation: The impact of a teacher’s conceptions of functions on his implementation of a reform curriculum.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29, 248–274.
Mathematical Association of America. (1991).A call for change: Recommendations for the mathematical preparation of teachers of mathematics. Washington, DC: Author.
McConnell, J. W., Brown, S., Eddins, S., Hackworth, M., & Usiskin, Z. (1990).UCSMP: Algebra. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
McDermott, L. C., Rosenquist, M. L., Van Zee, E. H. (1987). Student difficulties in connecting graphs and physics: Examples from kinematics.American Journal of Physics, 55, 503–512.
McDiarmid, G. W., Ball, D. L., & Anderson, C. W. (1989). Why staying one chapter ahead doesn’t really work: Subject-specific pedagogy. In M. C. Reynolds (Ed.),Knowledge base for the beginning teacher (pp. 193–205). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
Merriam-Webster’s collegiate dictionary (10th ed.). (1993). Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.
Moschkovich, J. (1990). Students’ interpretations of linear equations and their graphs.Proceedings of the 14th annual conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 109–116). Oaxtepex, Mexico: Program Committee.
Moschkovich, J., Schoenfeld, A. H., & Arcavi, A. (1993). Aspects of understanding: On multiple perspectives and representations of linear relations and connections among them. In T. A. Romberg, E. Fennema, & T. P. Carpenter (Eds.),Integrating research on the graphical representation of functions (pp. 69–100). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989).Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
Norman, A. (1992). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge of the concept of function. In G. Harel & E. Dubinsky (Eds.),The concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy (MAA Notes Vol. 25, pp. 215–232). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
Orton, A. (1984). Understanding rate of change.Mathematics in School, 23(5), 23–26.
Rizzuti, J. M. (1991). Students’ conceptualizations of mathematical functions: The effects of a pedagogical approach involving multiple representations (Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University, 1991).Dissertation Abstracts International, 52-10A, 3549.
Schoenfeld, A. H., Smith, J. P., & Arcavi, A. (1993). Learning: The microgenetic analysis of one student’s evolving understanding of a complex subject matter domain. In R. Glaser (Ed.),Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 55–175). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching.Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Simon, M. A. & Blume, G. W. (1994). Mathematical modeling as a component of understanding ratio-as-measure: A study of prospective elementary teachers.Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 13,183–197.
Singer, J. A., Resnick, L. B. (1992). Representations of proportional relationships: Are children part-part or part-whole reasoners?Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23, 231–246.
Stein, M. K., Baxter, J. A., Leinhardt, G. (1990). Subject-matter knowledge and elementary instruction: A case from functions and graphing.American Educational Research Journal, 27, 639–663.
Stump, S. L. (1996).Secondary mathematics teachers’ knowledge of the concept of slope. Unpublished doctoral dissertation/Illinois State University, Normal, IL.
Tall, D. & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity.Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 151–169.
Thompson, A. G., Thompson, P. W. (1996). Talking about rates conceptually, Part II: Mathematical knowledge for teaching.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 2–24.
Thompson, P. W. (1994). The development of the concept of speed and its relationship to the concepts of rate. In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.),The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp. 179–234). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Thompson, P. W., Thompson, A. G. (1994). Talking about rates conceptually, Part I: A teacher’s struggle.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25, 279–303.
Vergnaud, G. (1983). Multiplicative structures. In R. Lesh & M. Landau (Eds.),Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes (pp. 127–173). New York: Academic Press.
Vergnaud, G. (1988). Multiplicative structures. In J. Hiebert & M. Behr (Eds.),Number concepts and operation in the middle grades (pp. 141–161). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Wilson, M. R. (1994). One preservice secondary teacher’s understanding of function: The impact of a course integrating mathematical content and pedagogy.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25, 346–370.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stump, S. Secondary mathematics teachers’ knowledge of slope. Math Ed Res J 11, 124–144 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217065
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217065