Bulletin of Mathematical Biology

, Volume 64, Issue 3, pp 589–609 | Cite as

Topologically non-linked circular duplex DNA

  • Ken Biegeleisen


The discovery of circular DNA, over 30 years ago, introduced an element of uneasiness in what had been, up to that point, the almost picture-perfect story of the elucidation of the molecular biology of heredity. If DNA indeed has the Watson-Crick right-handed helical secondary structure, then in circular DNA, thousands, or perhaps even millions of twists must be removed in each generation, and re-wound in the next generation.

Although enzyme systems adequate for this task have long since been found and characterized, there have nevertheless arisen a number of proposals for alternative DNA structures in which the strands are topologically non-linked, so that they might separate during replication without having to be unwound. These structures have generally been put forth as theory only, and have been largely unaccompanied by experimental evidence to support their applicability to native DNA from living systems.

Recently, however, a report has emerged suggesting that it might be possible to separate, intact, the individual single-stranded circular half-chromosomes which constitute the double-stranded circular chromosomes of certain plasmids. This would not be possible unless the chromosomes had one of the alternative, topologically non-linked structures.

It is widely believed that after a half-century of worldwide DNA research, any significant change to the Watson-Crick structure is unlikely to stand up to scrutiny. Nevertheless, the present author has found that in many instances in which the behavior of circular duplex DNA is considered to be explicable only in terms of the topologically linked helical model, it is also possible to explain that same behavior in terms of a topologically non-linked model. It is necessary, in these instances, to make certain logical assumptions which cannot be conclusively proven at the present time.

The author herein offers an example of one such instance, namely an examination of the behavior of circular duplex DNA in an alkaline titration experiment, where conformational changes in DNA are deduced from changes in its buoyant density at pH’s between 7 and 14. These data have been explained in terms of topological linkage between the DNA strands, but they can also be explained without invoking any such topological linkage, provided that the above-mentioned logical assumptions can be accepted.

The principles which emerge from this are applicable to other settings in which knowledge of the topology of DNA is critical to the understanding of observed phenomena.


Helical Turn Strand Separation Topological Linkage Superhelical Turn Alkali Denaturation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Casey, J. and N. Davidson (1977). Rates of formation and thermal stabilities of RNA:DNA and DNA:DNA duplexes at high concentrations of formamide. Nucleic Acids Res. 4, 1539–1552.Google Scholar
  2. Crick, F. H.C., J. C. Wang and W. R. Bauer (1979). Is DNA really a double helix? J. Mol. Biol. 129, 449–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Day, L. A., R. L. Wiseman and C. J. Marzec (1979). Structure models for DNA in filamentous viruses with phosphates near the center. Nucleic Acids Res. 7, 1393–1403.Google Scholar
  4. Glaubiger, D. and J. E. Hearst (1967). Effect of superhelical structure on the secondary structure of DNA rings. Biopolymers 5, 691–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ikehara, M., S. Uesugi and J. Yano (1972). Left-handed helical polynucleotides with d-sugar phosphodiester backbones. Nat. New Biol. 240, 16, 17.Google Scholar
  6. Jaenisch, R., A. Mayer and A. Levine (1971). Replicating SV40 molecules containing closed circular template DNA strands. Nat. New Biol. 233, 72–75.Google Scholar
  7. Kang, C., I. Berger, C. Lockshin, R. Ratliff, R. Moyzis and A. Rich (1994). Crystal structure of intercalated four-stranded d(C3T) at 1.4 angstrom resolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 11636–11640.Google Scholar
  8. Kang, C., I. Berger, C. Lockshin, R. Ratliff, R. Moyzis and A. Rich (1995). Stable loop in the crystal structure of the intercalated four-stranded cytosine-rich metazoan telomere. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 3874–3878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Liu, D. J. and L. A. Day (1994). Pf1 virus structure: helical coat protein and DNA with paraxial phosphates. Science 265, 671–674.Google Scholar
  10. Mercado, C. M. and M. Tomasz (1977). Circular dichroism of mitomycin-DNA complexes. Evidence for a conformational change in DNA. Biochemistry 16, 2040–2046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mitsui, Y., R. Langridge, B. E. Shortle, C. R. Cantor, R. C. Grant, M. Kodama and R. D. Wells (1970). Physical and enzymatic studies on poly d(I-C)·poly d(I-C), an unusual double-helical DNA. Nature 228, 1166–1169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nordheim, A., M. L. Pardue, E. M. Lafer, A. Möller, B. D. Stollar and A. Rich (1981). Antibodies to left-handed Z-DNA bind to interband regions of Drosophila polytene chromosomes. Nature 294, 417–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pauling, L. and R. B. Corey (1953). A proposed structure for the nucleic acids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 39, 84–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pohl, F. M. (1976). Polymorphism of a synthetic DNA in solution. Nature 260, 365–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pohl, F. M. and T. M. Jovin (1972). Salt-induced co-operative conformational change of a synthetic DNA: equilibrium and kinetic studies with poly(dG-dC). J. Mol. Biol. 67, 375–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rodley, G. A., R. S. Scobie, R. H.T. Bates and R. M. Lewitt (1976). A possible conformation for double-stranded polynucleotides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA 73, 2959–2963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rush, M. G. and R. C. Warner (1970). Alkali denaturation of covalently closed circular duplex deoxyribonucleic acid. J. Biol. Chem. 245, 2704–2708.Google Scholar
  18. Sasisekharan, V., N. Pattabiraman, and G. Gupta (1978). Some implications of an alternative structure for DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 75, 4092–4096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sebring, E. D., T. J. Kelly Jr, M. M. Thoren and N. P Salzman (1971). Structure of replicating Simian Virus 40 deoxyribonucleic acid molecules. J. Virol. 8, 478–490.Google Scholar
  20. Shure, M. and J. Vinograd (1976). The number of superhelical turns in native virion SV40 DNA and Minicol DNA determined by the band counting method. Cell 8, 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stettler, U. H., H. Weber, T. Koller and Ch. Weissmann (1979). Preparation and characterization of form V DNA, the duplex DNA resulting from association of complementary, circular single-stranded DNA. J. Mol. Biol. 131, 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Strider, W. (1971). Denatured replicative form and complex DNA of φX174: isolation, renaturation, and sedimentation properties, PhD Thesis, Department of Biochemistry, New York University School of Medicine, First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  23. Strider, W. and R. C. Warner (1971). Denatured replicative form and complex DNA of φX174: isolation and renaturation. Fed. Proc. Fed. Amer. Soc. Exp. Biol. 30, 1053.Google Scholar
  24. Strider, W., M. N. Camien and R. C. Warner (1981). Renaturation of denatured, covalently closed circular DNA. J. Biol. Chem. 256, 7820–7829.Google Scholar
  25. Travers, F., A. M. Michelson and P. Douzou (1970). Conformational changes of nucleic acids in methanol-water solutions at low temperature. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 217, 1–6.Google Scholar
  26. Vinograd, J., J. Lebowitz and R. Watson (1968). Early and late helix-coil transitions in closed circular DNA. The number of superhelical turns in Polyoma DNA. J. Mol. Biol. 33, 173–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Vinograd, J., J. Lebowitz, R. Radloff, R. Watson and P. Laipis (1965). The twisted circular form of polyoma viral DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 53, 1104–1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang, A. H. J., G. J. Quigley, F. J. Kolpak, J. L. Crawford, J. H. Van Boom, G. Van Der Marel and A. Rich (1979). Molecular structure of a left-handed double helical DNA fragment at atomic resolution. Nature 282, 680–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wu, R and T. T. Wu (1996). A novel intact circular dsDNA supercoil. Bull. Math. Biol 58, 1171–1185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zimmer, C. and G. Luck (1974). Conformation and reactivity of DNA. IV. Circular dichroism studies of salt-induced conformational changes of DNAs of different base composition. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 361, 11–32.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Mathematical Biology 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ken Biegeleisen
    • 1
  1. 1.New YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations