Bulletin of Mathematical Biology

, Volume 63, Issue 2, pp 231–257 | Cite as

The migration of cells in multicell tumor spheroids

  • G. J. Pettet
  • C. P. Please
  • M. J. Tindall
  • D. L. S. McElwain
Article

Abstract

A mathematical model is proposed to explain the observed internalization of microspheres and 3H-thymidine labelled cells in steady-state multicellular spheroids. The model uses the conventional ideas of nutrient diffusion and consumption by the cells. In addition, a very simple model of the progress of the cells through the cell cycle is considered. Cells are divided into two classes, those proliferating (being in G 1, S, G 2 or M phases) and those that are quiescent (being in G 0). Furthermore, the two categories are presumed to have different chemotactic responses to the nutrient gradient. The model accounts for the spatial and temporal variations in the cell categories together with mitosis, conversion between categories and cell death. Numerical solutions demonstrate that the model predicts the behavior similar to existing models but has some novel effects. It allows for spheroids to approach a steady-state size in a non-monotonic manner, it predicts self-sorting of the cell classes to produce a thin layer of rapidly proliferating cells near the outer surface and significant numbers of cells within the spheroid stalled in a proliferating state. The model predicts that overall tumor growth is not only determined by proliferation rates but also by the ability of cells to convert readily between the classes. Moreover, the steady-state structure of the spheroid indicates that if the outer layers are removed then the tumor grows quickly by recruiting cells stalled in a proliferating state. Questions are raised about the chemotactic response of cells in differing phases and to the dependency of cell cycle rates to nutrient levels.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Burton, A. (1966). Rate of growth of solid tumors as a problem of diffusion. Growth 30, 157–176.Google Scholar
  2. Byrne, H. and M. Chaplain (1995). Growth of nonnecrotic tumors in the presence and absence of inhibitors. Math. Biosci. 130, 151–181.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Byrne, H. and S. Gourley (1997). The role of growth factors in avascular tumour growth. Math. Comput. Modelling 26, 35–55.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Chaplain, M. (1996). Avascular growth, angiogenesis and vascular growth in solid tumours: The mathematical modelling of the stages of tumour development. Math. Comput. Modelling 23, 47–87.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chaplain, M. and N. Britton (1993). On the concentration profile of a growth inhibitory factor in multicell spheroids. Math. Biosci. 115, 233–243.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Dorie, M., R. Kallman and M. Coyne (1986). Effect of cytochalasin b, nocodazole and irradiation on migration and internalization of cells and microspheres in tumor cell spheroids. Exp. Cell Res. 166, 370–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dorie, M., R. Kallman, D. Rapacchietta, D. van Antwerp and Y. Huang (1982). Migration and internalization of cells and polystrene microspheres in tumor cell spheroids. Exp. Cell Res. 141, 201–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Greenspan, H. (1972). Models for the growth of a solid tumor by diffusion. Stud. Appl. Math. 51, 317–340.MATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Greenspan, H. (1976). On the growth and stability of cell cultures and solid tumors. J. Theor. Biol. 56, 229–242.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. Hughes, F. and C. McCulloch (1991). Quantification of chemotactic response of quiescent and proliferating fibroblasts in boyden chambers by computer-assisted image analysis. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 39, 243–246.Google Scholar
  11. Knuechel, R. and R. Sutherland (1990). Recent developments in research with human tumor spheroids. Cancer J. 3, 234–243.Google Scholar
  12. Kunz-Schugart, L., M. Kreutz and R. Knuechel (1998). Multicellular spheroids: A three-dimensional in vitro culture system to study tumour biology. Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 79, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Landman, K. A. and C. Please. Tumour dynamics and necrosis: Surface tension and stability. IMAJ. Math. Appl. Med. Biol. (submitted).Google Scholar
  14. Mansbridge, J., R. Knuechel, A. Knapp and R. Sutherland (1992). Importance of tyrosine phosphates in the effects of cell-cell contact and microenvironments on egf-stimulated tyrosine phosphorylation. J. Cell. Physiol. 1, 433–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McElwain, D. and G. Pettet (1993). Cell migration in multicell spheroids: Swimming against the tide. Bull. Math. Biol. 55, 655–674.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Mueller-Klieser, W. (1997). Three-dimensional cell cultures: From molecular mechanisms to clinical applications. Am. J. Physiol. 273:4, 1109–1123.Google Scholar
  17. Mueller-Klieser, W. and J. Freyer (1986). Influence of glucose and oxygen supply conditions on the oxygenation of multicellular spheroids. Br. J. Cancer 53, 345–353.Google Scholar
  18. Mueller-Klieser, W. and R. Sutherland (1982). Oxygen tensions in multicell spheroids of two cell lines. Br. J. Cancer 45, 256–264.Google Scholar
  19. Murray, J. (1993). Mathematical Biology, 2nd edn, New York: Springer Verlag.MATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Palka, J., B. Adelmann-Grill, P. Francz and K. Bayreuther (1996). Differentiation stage and cell cycle position determine the chemotactic response of fibroblasts. Folia Histochem. Cytobiol. 34, 121–127.Google Scholar
  21. Please, C., G. Pettet and D. McElwain (1998). A new approach to modelling the formation of necrotic regions in tumours. Appl. Math. Lett. 11, 89–94.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Please, C., G. Pettet and D. McElwain (1999). Avascular tumour dynamics and necrosis. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 9, 569–579.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Roe, P. (1985). Some contributions to the modelling of discontinuous flows, in Large-scale Computations in Fluid Mechanics, Lectures in Applied Mathematics 22, B. Engquist, S. Osher and R. Somerville (Eds), Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, pp. 163–193.Google Scholar
  24. Sutherland, R. (1988). Cell and environment interactions in tumor microregions: The multicell spheroid model. Science 240, 177–184.Google Scholar
  25. Thompson, K. and H. Byrne (1999). Modelling the internalisation of labelled cells in tumour spheroids. Bull. Math. Biol. 61, 601–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Toro, E. (1989). A weighted average flux method for hyperbolic conservation laws. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 423, 401–418.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tubiana, M. (1971). The kinetics of tumour cell proliferation and radiotherapy. Br. J. Radiol. 44, 325–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ward, J. and J. King (1998a). Mathematical modelling of avascular-tumour growth ii: Modelling growth saturation. IMA J. Math. Appl. Med. Biol. 15, 1–42.Google Scholar
  29. Ward, J. and J. King (1998b). Mathematical modelling of the effects of mitotic inhibitors on avascular tumour growth. J. Theor. Med. 1–25.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Mathematical Biology 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. J. Pettet
    • 1
  • C. P. Please
    • 2
  • M. J. Tindall
    • 2
  • D. L. S. McElwain
    • 1
  1. 1.CiSSaIM, School of Mathematical SciencesQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.Faculty of Mathematical StudiesThe University of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations