The migration of cells in multicell tumor spheroids
- 369 Downloads
A mathematical model is proposed to explain the observed internalization of microspheres and 3H-thymidine labelled cells in steady-state multicellular spheroids. The model uses the conventional ideas of nutrient diffusion and consumption by the cells. In addition, a very simple model of the progress of the cells through the cell cycle is considered. Cells are divided into two classes, those proliferating (being in G 1, S, G 2 or M phases) and those that are quiescent (being in G 0). Furthermore, the two categories are presumed to have different chemotactic responses to the nutrient gradient. The model accounts for the spatial and temporal variations in the cell categories together with mitosis, conversion between categories and cell death. Numerical solutions demonstrate that the model predicts the behavior similar to existing models but has some novel effects. It allows for spheroids to approach a steady-state size in a non-monotonic manner, it predicts self-sorting of the cell classes to produce a thin layer of rapidly proliferating cells near the outer surface and significant numbers of cells within the spheroid stalled in a proliferating state. The model predicts that overall tumor growth is not only determined by proliferation rates but also by the ability of cells to convert readily between the classes. Moreover, the steady-state structure of the spheroid indicates that if the outer layers are removed then the tumor grows quickly by recruiting cells stalled in a proliferating state. Questions are raised about the chemotactic response of cells in differing phases and to the dependency of cell cycle rates to nutrient levels.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Burton, A. (1966). Rate of growth of solid tumors as a problem of diffusion. Growth 30, 157–176.Google Scholar
- Hughes, F. and C. McCulloch (1991). Quantification of chemotactic response of quiescent and proliferating fibroblasts in boyden chambers by computer-assisted image analysis. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 39, 243–246.Google Scholar
- Knuechel, R. and R. Sutherland (1990). Recent developments in research with human tumor spheroids. Cancer J. 3, 234–243.Google Scholar
- Landman, K. A. and C. Please. Tumour dynamics and necrosis: Surface tension and stability. IMAJ. Math. Appl. Med. Biol. (submitted).Google Scholar
- Mueller-Klieser, W. (1997). Three-dimensional cell cultures: From molecular mechanisms to clinical applications. Am. J. Physiol. 273:4, 1109–1123.Google Scholar
- Mueller-Klieser, W. and J. Freyer (1986). Influence of glucose and oxygen supply conditions on the oxygenation of multicellular spheroids. Br. J. Cancer 53, 345–353.Google Scholar
- Mueller-Klieser, W. and R. Sutherland (1982). Oxygen tensions in multicell spheroids of two cell lines. Br. J. Cancer 45, 256–264.Google Scholar
- Palka, J., B. Adelmann-Grill, P. Francz and K. Bayreuther (1996). Differentiation stage and cell cycle position determine the chemotactic response of fibroblasts. Folia Histochem. Cytobiol. 34, 121–127.Google Scholar
- Roe, P. (1985). Some contributions to the modelling of discontinuous flows, in Large-scale Computations in Fluid Mechanics, Lectures in Applied Mathematics 22, B. Engquist, S. Osher and R. Somerville (Eds), Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, pp. 163–193.Google Scholar
- Sutherland, R. (1988). Cell and environment interactions in tumor microregions: The multicell spheroid model. Science 240, 177–184.Google Scholar
- Ward, J. and J. King (1998a). Mathematical modelling of avascular-tumour growth ii: Modelling growth saturation. IMA J. Math. Appl. Med. Biol. 15, 1–42.Google Scholar
- Ward, J. and J. King (1998b). Mathematical modelling of the effects of mitotic inhibitors on avascular tumour growth. J. Theor. Med. 1–25.Google Scholar