World Journal of Urology

, Volume 35, Issue 7, pp 1125–1132 | Cite as

Collagen cell carriers seeded with human urothelial cells for urethral reconstructive surgery: first results in a xenograft minipig model

  • Stefan Aufderklamm
  • Martin Vaegler
  • Alexandra Kelp
  • Sabine Maurer
  • Leon Gustafsson
  • Jens Mundhenk
  • Silke Busch
  • Lisa Daum
  • Arnulf Stenzl
  • Bastian Amend
  • Karl-Dietrich Sievert
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

Urethral strictures are a common disease of the lower urinary tract in men. At present, the use of buccal mucosa is the method of choice for long or recurrent strictures. However, autologous tissue-engineered grafts are still under investigation for reconstructive urological surgery. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the use of human urothelial cells (HUC) seeded on bovine collagen type I-based cell carriers (CCC) in an animal model and to evaluate short-term outcome of the surgical procedure.

Methods

Four male Göttingen minipigs were used with immunosuppression (cyclosporine A) for this pilot xenograft study. HUC obtained from human benign ureteral tissue were stained by PKH26 and seeded on a collagen cell carrier (CCC). Seven weeks after urethral stricture induction and protective vesicostomy, cell-seeded CCC was implanted in the urethra with HUC luminal and antiluminal, respectively. After two weeks animals were euthanized, urethrography and histological assessment were performed.

Results

Surgery was technically feasible in all minipigs. Stricture was radiologically established 7 weeks after induction. CCC was visible after two weeks and showed good integration without signs of inflammation or rejection. In the final urethrography, no remaining stricture could be detected. Near porcine urothelium, PKH26-positive areas were found even if partially detached from CCC. Although diminished, immunofluorescence with pankeratin, CK20, E-cadherin and ZO-1 showed intact urothelium in several areas on and nearby CCC.

Conclusion

Finally, this study demonstrates that the HUC-seeded CCC used as a xenograft in minipigs is technically feasible and shows promising results for further studies.

Keywords

Xenograft Collagen matrix Human urothelial cells Reconstructive urology Urethra Tissue engineering 

References

  1. 1.
    Barbagli G, Palminteri E, Lazzeri M, Guazzoni G (2003) Anterior urethral strictures. BJU Int 92(5):497–505CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gozzi C, Tritschler S, Bastian PJ, Stief CG (2008) Management of urethral strictures. Der Urologe Ausg A 47(12):1615–1622. doi:10.1007/s00120-008-1903-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rodder K, Olianas R, Fisch M (2006) [Urethral strictures–operative strategy]. Der Urologe Ausg A 45 (4):499–511; quiz 512–493. doi:10.1007/s00120-006-1031-9
  4. 4.
    Engel O, Fisch M (2010) Urethral reconstruction after failed primary surgery. Der Urologe Ausg A 49(7):822–826. doi:10.1007/s00120-010-2315-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bhargava S, Chapple CR (2004) Buccal mucosal urethroplasty: is it the new gold standard? BJU Int 93(9):1191–1193. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2003.04860.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sinha RJ, Singh V, Sankhwar SN, Dalela D (2009) Donor site morbidity in oral mucosa graft urethroplasty: implications of tobacco consumption. BMC Urol 9:15. doi:10.1186/1471-2490-9-15 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mangera A, Chapple CR (2013) Tissue engineering in urethral reconstruction: an update. Asian J Androl 15(1):89–92. doi:10.1038/aja.2012.91 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Idzenga T, Pel JJ, van Mastrigt R (2006) A biophysical model of the male urethra: comparing viscoelastic properties of polyvinyl alcohol urethras to male pig urethras. Neurourol Urodyn 25(5):451–460. doi:10.1002/nau.20282 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Seibold J, Selent C, Feil G, Wiedemann J, Colleselli D, Mundhenk J, Gakis G, Sievert KD, Schwentner C, Stenzl A (2012) Development of a porcine animal model for urethral stricture repair using autologous urothelial cells. J Pediatr Urol 8(2):194–200. doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2011.02.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sievert KD, Selent-Stier C, Wiedemann J, Greiner TO, Amend B, Stenzl A, Feil G, Seibold J (2012) Introducing a large animal model to create urethral stricture similar to human stricture disease: a comparative experimental microscopic study. J Urol 187(3):1101–1109. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2011.10.132 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Feil G, Christ-Adler M, Maurer S, Corvin S, Rennekampff HO, Krug J, Hennenlotter J, Kuehs U, Stenzl A, Sievert KD (2006) Investigations of urothelial cells seeded on commercially available small intestine submucosa. Eur Urol 50(6):1330–1337. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2006.05.041 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hennig C, Theuring F (1990) Physiologic regeneration of rat urothelium after pulse and continual labeling with 3H-thymidine at various ages. Acta Histochem Suppl 39:263–266PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bouhout S, Chabaud S, Bolduc S (2016) Organ-specific matrix self-assembled by mesenchymal cells improves the normal urothelial differentiation in vitro. World J Urol 34(1):121–130. doi:10.1007/s00345-015-1596-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhu L, Fang Y, Liu Z, Wang P, Wang Y, Xu H (2008) Rabbit anti-human leukocyte polyclonal antibody inhibits xenogeneic cell-mediated immune responses. Transpl Proc 40(8):2760–2763. doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.07.111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Katnik-Prastowska I, Lis J, Matejuk A (2014) Glycosylation of uroplakins: implications for bladder physiopathology. Glycoconj J 31(9):623–636. doi:10.1007/s10719-014-9564-4 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nagele U, Maurer S, Feil G, Bock C, Krug J, Sievert KD, Stenzl A (2008) In vitro investigations of tissue-engineered multilayered urothelium established from bladder washings. Eur Urol 54(6):1414–1422. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2008.01.072 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Raya-Rivera A, Esquiliano DR, Yoo JJ, Lopez-Bayghen E, Soker S, Atala A (2011) Tissue-engineered autologous urethras for patients who need reconstruction: an observational study. Lancet 377(9772):1175–1182. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62354-9 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefan Aufderklamm
    • 1
  • Martin Vaegler
    • 2
  • Alexandra Kelp
    • 1
  • Sabine Maurer
    • 1
  • Leon Gustafsson
    • 1
  • Jens Mundhenk
    • 3
  • Silke Busch
    • 4
  • Lisa Daum
    • 5
  • Arnulf Stenzl
    • 1
  • Bastian Amend
    • 1
  • Karl-Dietrich Sievert
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of UrologyEberhard Karls University TuebingenTübingenGermany
  2. 2.Experimental and Clinical Research Center (ECRC)University Clinic CharitéBerlinGermany
  3. 3.Department of UrologyDiakonie Hospital StuttgartStuttgartGermany
  4. 4.Viscofan, BioEngineeringWeinheimGermany
  5. 5.Animal Doctor FacilityNeustadt/AischGermany

Personalised recommendations