En
Abstract
Context
Nasal obstruction is a very common complaint, which may be caused by various causes, one of the most important being septal deviation. Many techniques have been described to correct these septal deviations since the middle of 19th century. There have been several modifications since its inception. The application of endoscopic techniques to correct septal deformities was initially described by both Lanza and colleagues and by Stammberger in 1991.
Aims
Comparing the efficacy of endoscopic septoplasty with traditional septoplasty in the treatment of cases with septal deviations.
Patients and methods
Thirty cases complaining mainly of nasal obstruction due to significant septal deviations were selected. They were randomly divided into two groups: group A patients underwent endoscopic septoplasty and group B underwent traditional septoplasty. The Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale was an important step in assessment.
Results
The two procedures are suitable to correct septal deformities, with a slight upper hand for the endoscope in particular cases. We highlight in this study the advantages and disadvantages of the use of the nasal endoscope to correct nasal septal deviation.
Conclusion
Although mainly used in sinus surgery, the endoscope has also found its way in nasal septal surgery as it facilitates accurate identification of the pathology due to better illumination, improved accessibility to remote areas and magnification. It allows precise resection of the pathological areas without the need of an extended dissection. Endoscopic septoplasty is associated with a significant reduction in the patient’s morbidity in the postoperative period due to limited extent of flap dissection and limited manipulation and resection of the septal framework. However, the endoscope has its own limitations which include loss of binocular vision and the need for frequent cleaning. The NOSE scale also correlates well with the postoperative results of the study.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Siegel NS, Gliklich RE, Taghizadeh F, Chang Y. Outcomes of septoplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 122: 228–232.
Cantrell H. Limited septoplasty for endoscopic sinus surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 116: 274–277.
Maran AGD. Septoplasty. J Laryngol Otol 1974; 88: 393–402.
Marks SC. Nasal and sinus surgery. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Co.; 2000. 59–63.
Nayak DR, Balakrishnan R, Murthy KD. An endoscopic approach to the deviated nasal septum — a preliminary study. J Laryngol Otol 1998; 112: 934–939.
Lanza DC, Kennedy DW, Zinreich SJ. Nasal endoscopy & its surgical applications. In: Lee KJ, editor Essential otolaryngology: head & neck surgery. 7th ed. Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc. New York: 1999. 407–425.
Stewart MG, Witsell DL, Smith TL, Weaver EM, Yueh B, Hannley MT. Development and validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130: 157–163.
Brain D. The nasal septum. In: Kern AG, editor. Scott-Brown’s Otolaryngology. 6th ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1997; 4:11/1–11/27.
Stammberger H. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery: the Messerklinger technique. Philadelphia: BC Decker; 1991. 430–434.
Giles WC, Gross CW, Abram AC, Greene WM, Avner TG. Endoscopic septoplasty. Laryngoscope 1994; 104: 1507–1509.
Park DH, Kim TM, Han DG, Ahn KY. Endoscopic-assisted correction of the deviated nose. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1998; 22: 190–195.
Hwang PH, McLaughlin RB, Lanza DC, Kennedy DW. Endoscopic septoplasty: indication, technique, and results. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999; 120: 678–682.
Sautter NB, Smith TL. Endoscopic septoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2009; 42: 253–260.
Kahveci OK, Miman MC, Yucel A, Yucedag F, Okur E, Altuntas A. The efficiency of Nose Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale on patients with nasal septal deviation. Auris Nasus Larynx 2012; 39: 275–279.
Vanclooster C, Jorissen M. Endoscopic septal spur resection in combination with endoscopic sinus surgery. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg 1998; 52: 335–335339.
Gupta N. Endoscopic septoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005; 57: 240–240243.
Trimarchi M, Bellini C, Toma S, Bussi M. Back-and-forth endoscopic septoplasty: analysis of the technique and outcomes. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2012; 2: 40–4044.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Rights and permissions
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Guindi, S.S., Mostafa, H.S. & Fawzy, T.O. Endoscopic-assisted septoplasty versus traditional septoplasty: assessment by the NOSE scale. Egypt J Otolaryngol 32, 26–31 (2016). https://doi.org/10.4103/1012-5574.175801
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1012-5574.175801