En
Abstract
Background
A cochlear implant (CI) is an auditory prosthesis that stimulates the primary auditory nerve fibers electrically to elicit sound perception in individuals with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing impairments. Speech intelligibility is a joint product of a speaker and a listener and can provide a close approximation of an individual’s everyday communication status, and cochlear implants can facilitate the development of speech and language skills in prelingually deaf patients.
Aim
The aim of this work was to study whether there is an advantage of one ear in the improvement of speech intelligibility in pediatric and adult cochlear-implanted patients.
Study design
A cross-sectional study to assess the speech intelligibility of right and left cochlear-implanted patients.
Patients and methods
The study included 50 cochlear-implanted patients (24 male and 26 female): 25 of the patients were prelingual and 25 were postlingual. Twenty-six of the patients were implanted on the right ear and 24 were implanted on the left ear. Speech intelligibility assessment was conducted using the Arabic Speech Intelligibility test. This Arabic Speech Intelligibility test is meant to be an objective measure as the examiner does not have to evaluate how a word was said.
Results
The results revealed that there was no significant difference between the speech intelligibility percentage regarding the onset of deafness (prelingual or postlingual), the sex and the duration of therapy, but there was a significant difference between the speech intelligibility percentage in right-ear-implanted and left-ear-implanted patients, with marked advantage for the implanted right ear.
Conclusion and recommendation
Right-ear cochlear implantation has an advantage over left-ear implantation regarding the speech intelligibility. Hence, in case of bilateral profound deafness of the same degree with no anatomical complications in either of the ears, it is recommended to choose the right ear for cochlear implantation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Tobey E, Geers A, Brenner C, Altuna D, Gabbert G. Factors associated with development of speech production skills in children implanted by age five. Ear Hear 2003; 24: 36S–45S.
Chin S, Bergeson T, Phan J. Speech intelligibility and prosody production in children with cochlear implants. J Commun Disord 2012; 45: 355–366.
Bunton K, Kent R, Kent J, Duffy J. The effects of flattening fundamental frequency contours on sentence intelligibility in speakers with dysarthria. Clin Linguist Phon 2001; 15: 181–193.
Kent R, Miolo G, Bloedel S. The intelligibility of children’s speech: a review of evaluation procedures. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 1994; 3: 81–95.
Svirsky M, Chin S. Speech production. In: Waltzman SB, Cohen NL, editors. Cochlear implants. New York: Thieme Medical; 2000. 293–309.
Loring D, Meador K, Lee G, Murro A, Smith J, Flaningin H. Cerebral language lateralization: evidence from intracarotid amobarbital testing. Neuropsychologica 1990; 28: 831–838.
Breier J, Hiscock M, Jahrsdoerfer R, Gray L. Ear advantage in dichotic listening after correlation for early congenital hearing loss. Neuropsychologica 1998; 36: 209–216.
Jensen J, Borre S, Jhansen P. Unilateral sensorineural hearing loss in children: cognitive abilities with respect to right/left ear differences. Br J Audiol 1989; 23: 215–220.
Justice L. Communication sciences and disorders: an introduction. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall; 2006.
Kotby MN, Khairy A, Barakah M, Rifaie N, El-Shobary A. Language testing of Arabic speaking children. In: Kotby MN, editor. Proceedings of the XXIII world congress of the International Association of Logopedics and Phonetics (August 6–10). Cairo, Egypt; 1995. 263–266.
Abdel Hamid A, Bassiouny S, Hegazi M, Saber A, Nassar G, Ibrahim A. Development of Arabic Speech Intelligibility test for children [MD thesis]. Cairo: Unit of Phoniatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University; 2010.
Popelar J, Erre J, Aran J, Cazals Y. Plastic changes in ipsi-contralateral differences of auditory cortex and inferior colliculus evoked potentials after injury to one ear in the adult guinea pig. Hear Res 1994; 72: 125–134.
Hartvig Jensen J, Borre S, Johansen P. Unilateral sensorineural hearing loss in children: cognitive abilities with respect to right/left ear differences. Br J Audiol 1989; 23:215–222.
Niedzielski A, Humeniuk E, Blaziak P, Gwizda G. Intellectual efficiency of children with unilateral hearing loss. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2006; 70: 1529–1532.
Henkin Y, Taitelbaum-Swead R, Hildesheimer M, Migirov L, Kronenberg J, Kishon-Rabin L. Is there a right cochlear implant advantage. Otol Neurotol 2008; 29: 489–494.
Buarque L, Brazorotto J, Cavalcanti H, Lima L Jr, Lima D, Ferreira M. Auditory performance during a period of time in cochlear implant users with postlingual hearing loss. Audiol Commun Res 2013; 18: 120–125.
Morris L, Mallur P, Roland J, Waltzman S, Lalwani A. Implication of central asymmetry speech processing on selecting the ear for cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 2007; 28: 25–30.
Deguine O, Garcia de Quevedo S, Fraysse B, Cormary X, Uziel A, Demonet J. Criteria for selecting the side for cochlear implantation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1995; 166: 403–406.
Allen M, Nikolopoulos T, O’Donoghue G. Speech intelligibility in children after cochlear implantation. Am J Otol 1998; 19: 742–746.
Calmels M, Saliba I, Wanna G, Cochard N, Fillaux J, Deguine O, et al. Speech perception and speech intelligibility in children after cochlear implantation. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2004; 68: 347–351.
Lenarz M, Sonmez H, Joseph G, Buchner A, Lenarz T. Long-term performance of cochlear implants in postlingually deafened adults. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012; 147: 112–118.
Manrique M, Espinosa J, Huarte A, Molina M, Garcia-Tapia R, Artieda J. Cochlear implants in postlingual persons: results during the first five years of the clinical course. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 1998; 49: 19–24.
Manrique M, Ramos A, Morera C, Cenjor C, Lavilla M, Boleas M, et al. Analysis of the cochlear implant as a treatment technique for profound hearing loss in pre and postlocutive patients. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 2006; 57: 2–23.
Klop W, Boermans P, Ferrier M, Van den Hout W, Stiggelbout A, Frijns J. Clinical relevance of quality of life outcome in cochlear implantation in postlingually deafened adults. Otol Neurotol 2008; 29: 615–621.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Conflicts of interest
None declared.
Rights and permissions
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Mohammed, A.A., Sarwat, S.A. The side of cochlear implantation and speech intelligibility in pediatric and adult cochlear implantees. Egypt J Otolaryngol 30, 362–366 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4103/1012-5574.144977
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1012-5574.144977