Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fate of bone grafting for acetabular defects in total hip replacement

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: The use of allografts and autografts in the management of acetabular defects have been reported with varying results. Trabecular metal is an expensive option in the management of these defects. This study aims to assess the fate and efficacy of bone grafting for acetabular bone defects in total hip arthroplasty.

Materials and Methods: A total of 30 hips in 28 patients with acetabular deficiencies were treated with bone grafting and total hip replacement (THR). Seventeen hips had American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) type 2 (Paprosky type 2c) deficiency and 13 had AAOS type 3 (Paprosky type 3a) defects of the acetabulum. Allografts were used in 15 patients and autografts were used in the remaining 13. Cemented total hip arthroplasty was done in 18 hips and uncementedTHR in 12. Seven patients underwent the procedure for, acetabular erosion and symptoms following hemiarthroplasty (4 out of 7), or, acetabular revision for failure (3 out of 7) following total hip arthroplasty. Acetabular deficiencies in other patients were due to posttraumatic causes, advanced primary hip arthritis and second stage treatment of postinfective arthritis. A mesh was used in 6 hips and screws were used in 13 hips for graft fixation.

Results: Patients were followed up clinicoradiologically for a period of 10 months to 4 years (mean 23.4 months). One patient required staged revision due to infection. Two patients had early asymptomatic cup migration. One patient had graft lysis and change in cup inclination with persistent pain. He was not keen on further intervention at last followup. Other patients were pain free at the time of followup with radiographs showing maintenance of graft and implant position.

Conclusion: Bone grafting is a suitable option in the management of acetabular defects in total hip arthroplasty, especially in resource challenged countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Troelsen A, Malchau E, Sillesen N, Malchau H. A review of current fixation use and registry outcomes in total hip arthroplasty: The uncemented paradox. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013;471:2052–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Borland WS, Bhattacharya R, Holland JP, Brewster NT. Use of porous trabecular metal augments with impaction bone grafting in management of acetabular bone loss. Acta Orthop 2012;83:347–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Harris WH, Crothers O, Oh I. Total hip replacement and femoral-head bone-grafting for severe acetabular deficiency in adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1977;59:752–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. McCollum DE, Nunley JA, Harrelson JM. Bone-grafting in total hip replacement for acetabular protrusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1980;62:1065–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Slooff TJ, Huiskes R, van Horn J, Lemmens AJ. Bone grafting in total hip replacement for acetabular protrusion. Acta Orthop Scand 1984;55:593–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rodriguez JA, Huk OL, Pellicci PM, Wilson PD Jr. Autogenous bone grafts from the femoral head for the treatment of acetabular deficiency in primary total hip arthroplasty with cement. Long term results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995;77:1227–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hendrich C, Mehling I, Sauer U, Kirschner S, Martell JM. Cementless acetabular reconstruction and structural bone-grafting in dysplastic hips. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88:387–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Garcia-Cimbrelo E, Cruz-Pardos A, Garcia-Rey E, Ortega-Chamarro J. The survival and fate of acetabular reconstruction with impaction grafting for large defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468:3304–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Busch VJ, Gardeniers JW, Verdonschot N, Sloof FTJ, Schreurs BW. Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone-grafting and a cemented cup in patients younger than fifty years old: A concise followup, at twenty to twenty-eight years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011;93:367–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sternheim A, Abolghasemian M, Safir OA, Backstein D, Gross AE, Kuzyk PR. A long term survivorship comparison between cemented and uncemented cups with shelf grafts in revision total hip arthroplasty after dysplasia. J Arthroplasty 2013;28:303–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Levine B, Delia Valle CJ, Jacobs JJ. Applications of porous tantalum in total hip arthroplasty. JAm Acad Orthop Surg 2006;14:646–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Van Kleunen JP, Lee GC, Lementowski PW, Nelson CL, Garino JP. Acetabular revisions using trabecular metal cups and augments. J Arthroplasty 2009;24:64–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. De LeeJ G, Charnley J. Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976;121:20–32

    Google Scholar 

  14. Van Egmond N, De Kam DC, Gardeniers JW, Schreurs BW. Revisions of extensive acetabular defects with impaction grafting and a cement cup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011;469:562–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Van Haaren EH, Heyligers IC, Alexander FG, Wuisman PI. High rate of failure of impaction grafting in large acetabular defects. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007;89:296–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sporer SM, Paprosky WG. The use of a trabecular metal acetabular component and trabecular metal augment for severe acetabular defects. J Arthroplasty 2006;21:83–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee JM, Nam HT. Acetabular revision total hip arthroplasty using an impacted morselized allograft and a cementless cup: Minimum 10-year followup. J Arthroplasty 2011;26:1057–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mall NA, Nunley RM, Smith KE, Maloney WJ, Clohisy JC, Barrack RL. The fate of grafting acetabular defects during revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468:3286–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pulido L, Rachala SR, Cabanela ME. Cementless acetabular revision: Past, present, and future. Revision total hip arthroplasty: The acetabular side using cementless implants. Int Orthop 2011;35:289–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anil Thomas Oommen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oommen, A.T., Krishnamoorthy, V.P., Poonnoose, P.M. et al. Fate of bone grafting for acetabular defects in total hip replacement. IJOO 49, 181–186 (2015). https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.152462

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.152462

Key words

MeSH terms

Navigation