Skip to main content
Log in

Better Prediction of the Performance of a Radio-frequency Ion Thruster

  • Published:
Journal of the Korean Physical Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A zero-dimensional analytical model for an RF discharge ion thruster has been improved to predict the thruster performance better. Improvements were made by incorporating most physical phenomena expected in an RF ion thruster, such as secondary electron emission, double ionization, a variable Clausing factor, grid optical transparency, and an ion confinement factor affected by the electromagnetic field. Clausing factors were calculated for each flow rate by using a Monte-Carlo technique. The grid optical transparency was calculated using an ion optics simulation. The ion confinement factor was also calculated for each flow rate by using the calculated magnetic field strength obtained from magnetic field simulations. The ion confinement factor turned out to have the greatest effect on the results while minor corrections were achieved by other processes. Comparison with previously reported analytical solutions and experimental data showed improved prediction of the thruster performance for various size and power ranges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. Y. Choueiri, J. Propul. Power 20, 193 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. D. Lev et al., in Proceedings of 35th International Electric Propulsion Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, October 8–12, IEPC-2017-242 (2017).

  3. S. Mazouffre, Plasma Sources Sci. T. 25, 033002 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. R. G. Jahn and E. Y. Choueiri, Electric Propulsion, Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology (Academic Press, New York, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Killinger, H. Leiter and R. Kukies, in 43rd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, AIAA Paper 2007-5200 (2007).

  6. M. Tsay, K. Hohman and L. Olson, in 23rd Annual AIAA/USU, SSC09-II-1 (2009).

  7. M. Martinez-Sanchez and J. E. Pollard, J. Propul. Power 14, 688 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. R. E. Wirz, in Proceedings of the 34th International Electric Propulsion Conference, Hyogo-Kobe, Japan, July 4–10, IEPC-2015-275 (2015).

  9. R. Henrich, M. Becker and C. Heiliger, in Proceedings of 35th International Electric Propulsion Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, October 8–12, IEPC-2017-518 (2017).

  10. T. Arzt, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 21, 278 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Tsay, Ph.D. thesis, MIT, 2010.

  12. D. M. Goebel, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 36, 2111 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Dobkevicius and D. Feili, J. Propul. Power 33, 939 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. P. Chabert et al., Phys. Plasmas 19, 073512 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. P. Chabert and N. Braithwaite, Physics of Radio-Frequency Plasma (Cambridge University, Cambridge, 2011).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. S. V. Kanev, S. A. Khartov and V. V. Nigmatzyanov, Procedia Engineer. 185, 31 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. D. Bohm, The Characteristics of Electrical Discharge in Magnetic Fields (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1949).

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. M. File, M. Martinez-Sanchez and J. Szabo, in Proceedings of 33rd Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, Seattle, Washington, USA, July 06–09 (1997), p.3052.

  19. J. P. Bugeat and C. Koppel, in Proceedings of 24th International Electric Propulsion Conference, 286 (1995).

  20. N. Gascon, M. Dudeck and S. Barral, Phys. Plasma 10, 4123 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. D. M. Goebel and I. Katz, Fundamentals of Electric Propulsion: Ion and Hall Thrusters (JPL, California, 2008).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. C. Farnell, Performance and lifetime simulation of ion thruster optics (Ph.D. Dissertation, Colorado State University, 2007).

  23. P. Clausing, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 8, 636 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. http://esgeetech.com/products/vizglow-plasma-modeling/VizGlow/ for VizGlow, Esgee Technologies (2018).

  25. H. Renault, M. Silvi, K. Bohnhoff and H. Gray, in 2nd European Spacecraft Propulsion Conference, ESA SP-398, Noordwijk, Netherlands, May 27–29 (1997), p.251.

  26. N. Caruso and M. Walker, Front. Phys. 6, 161 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. C. Volkmar and U. Ricklefs, Eur. Phys. J. D 69, 1 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. H. W. Loeb et al., Development of a RIT-Millithruster, 55th International Astronautical Congress of the Int. Astronautical Federation, Int. Academy of Astronautics; International Institute of Space Law, IAC-04-S.4.04, (2004).

  29. H. J. Leiter, H. W. Loeb and Karl-Heinz Schartner, The RIT 15 Ion Engines — A Survey of the Present State of Radio Frequency Ion Thruster Technology and its Future Potentiality, ESA SP-465, 423 (2001).

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the 2017 Research fund of the University of Ulsan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jichul Shin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pham, Q.T.D., Shin, J. Better Prediction of the Performance of a Radio-frequency Ion Thruster. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 76, 137–144 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.76.137

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.76.137

Keywords

Navigation