Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental Study of In-vivo Dosimetry Using Glass Rod Dosimeters to Minimize the Initialization

  • Published:
Journal of the Korean Physical Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 12 November 2019

This article has been updated

Abstract

In-vivo dosimetry, in which small detector elements are attached to a patient’s body, is an important technique for directly evaluating radiation treatment doses. The glass rod dosimeter (GRD) possesses several advantages over alternatives, which makes it one of the most useful detectors for in-vivo dosimetry. However, because the GRD initialization process requires a prolonged exposure at very high temperatures, as well as subsequent gradual quenching, each measurement takes approximately a day to complete. Therefore, we investigated the reliability of a GRD used repeatedly without initialization processes to improve efficiency. Ten doses of 0.5 Gy were delivered and read using three GRD elements. Then, the same procedure was performed for doses of 1.0 Gy. A readout error of less than 2% was maintained for up to three irradiation doses. However, the fluctuations in the readout data increased significantly as the number of irradiation doses increased. In addition, we discovered that the combined uncertainty of the readouts was influenced more heavily by the cumulative amount of irradiation than it was by the number of doses. Our results should provide guidance for accurate and efficient GRD use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 12 November 2019

    The affiliation of Yongkan Ki should be corrected as follow:

References

  1. J. Izewska, P. Andreo, S. Vatnitsky and K. R. Shortt, Radiother. Oncol. 69, 91 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Izewska and P. Andreo, Radiother. Oncol. 54, 65 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. I. H. Ferreira, A. Dutreix, A. Bridier, J. Chavaudra and H. Svensson, Radiother. Oncol. 55, 273 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. B. Mijnheer, S. Beddar, J. Izewska and C. Reft, Med. Phys. 40, 070903 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Ranogajec-Komor, Ž. Knežević, S. Miljanić and B. Vekić, Radiat. Meas. 43, 392 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. H. Mizuno, T. Kanai, Y. Kusano, S. Ko, M. Ono, A. Fukumura, K. Abe, K. Nishizawa, M. Shimbo, S. Sakata, S. Ishikura and H. Ikeda, Radiother. Oncol. 86, 258 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J. E. Rah, S. Kim, K. H. Cheong, J. W. Lee, J. B. Chung, D. O. Shin and T. S. Suh, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 67, 324 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J. H. Lee, M. S. Lin, S. M. Hsu, I. J. Chen, W. L. Chen and C. F. Wang, Radiat. Meas. 44, 86 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. J. E. Rah, U. J. Hwang, H. Jeong, S. Y. Lee, D. H. Lee, D. H. Shin, M. Yoon, S. B. Lee, R. Lee and S. Y. Park, Radiat. Meas. 46, 40 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dahl Park.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jeon, H., Nam, J., Lee, J. et al. Experimental Study of In-vivo Dosimetry Using Glass Rod Dosimeters to Minimize the Initialization. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 72, 628–632 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.72.628

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.72.628

Keywords

Navigation