Abstract
These days, 3D-printers are on the rise in various fields including radiation therapy. This preliminary study aimed to estimate the dose characteristics of 3D-printer materials that could be used as compensators or immobilizers in radiation treatment. The cubes with length of 5 cm and different densities of 50%, 75% and 100% were printed by using a 3D-printer. Planning CT scans of the cubes were performed by using a CT simulator (Brilliance CT, Philips Medical System, Netherlands). Dose distributions behind the cube were calculated after a 6 MV photon beam had passed through the cube. The dose responses for the 3D-printed cube, air and water were measured by using EBT3 film and a 2D array detector. When the results of air case were normalized to 100, the dose calculated by the TPS and the measured doses to 50% and 75% cube were of the 96 ~ 99. The measured and the calculated doses to water and to 100% of the cube were 82 ~ 84. The HU values for the 50%, 75% and 100% density cases were -910, -860 and -10, respectively. The dose characteristics of the 50% and the 75% products were similar to that of air while the 100% product seemed to be similar to that of water. This information will provide guidelines for making an immobilization tool that can play the role of a compensator and for making a real human phantom that can exactly describe the inside of the human body. This study was necessary for Poly Lactic Acid (PLA) based 3D-printer users who are planning to make something related to radiation therapy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
E. J. Hall and C. Wuu, Int. J. Radiot. Biol. Phys. 56, 83 (2003).
M. Yoon, S. H. Ahn, J. S. Kim, D. H. Shin, S. Y. Park, S. B. Lee, K. H. Shin and K. H. Cho, Int. J. Radiat. Biol. Phys. 77, 1477 (2010).
R. M. Howell, N. E. Hertel, Z. Wang, J. Hutchinson and G. D. Fullerton, Med. Phys. 33, 360 (2006).
U. Schneider and B. Kaser-Hotz, Z. Med. Phys. 15, 31 (2005).
M. J. Zelefsky et al., Int. J. Radiat. Biol. Phys. 41, 491 (1998).
C. C. Ling et al., Int. J. Radiat. Biol. Phys. 35, 721 (1996).
C. M. Nutting, D. J. Convery, V. P. Cosgrove, C. Rowbottom, A. R. Padhani, S. Webb and D. P. Dearnaley, Int. J. Radiat. Biol. Phys. 48, 649 (2000).
K. Otto, Med. Phys. 35, 310 (2008).
C. X. Yu, Phys. Med. Biol. 40, 1435 (1995).
J. S. Welsh, P. R. Pastel, M. A. Ritter, P. M. Harari, T. R.Mackie and M. P. Mehta, Technol. Cancer. Res. & Treatment. 1, 311 (2002).
T. T. Mackie, Phys. Med. Biol. 51, 427 (2006).
D. A. Low, G. Starkschall, S. W. Bujnowski, L. L. Wang and K. R. Hogstrom, Med. Phys. 19, 115 (1992).
J. K. Rajat, K. R. Hogstrom, A. S. Garden, M. D. Mc- Neese, R. A. Boyd and J. A. Antolak, Int. J. Radiat. Biol. Phys. 53, 1023 (2002).
B. Raffaella, M. Elena and C. Stefano, N. Engl. J. Med. 368, 2043 (2013).
S. G. Ju, M. K. Kim, C. S. Hong, J. S. Kim, Y. Y. Han, D. H. Choi, D. H. Shin and S. B. Lee, Int. J. Radiat. Biol. Phys. 88, 453 (2014).
D. W. Kim, S. H. Bae, W. K. Chung and Y. H. Lee, J. Korean. Phys. Soc. 64, 1070 (2014).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jeong, S., Yoon, M., Chung, W.K. et al. Preliminary study of the dosimetric characteristics of 3D-printed materials with megavoltage photons. Journal of the Korean Physical Society 67, 189–194 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.67.189
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.67.189