Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of the difference in tube voltage of the CT scanner on dose calculation

  • Published:
Journal of the Korean Physical Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) measures the attenuation coefficient of an object and converts the value assigned to each voxel into a CT number. In radiation therapy, the CT number, which is directly proportional to the linear attenuation coefficient, must be converted to an electron density for radiation dose calculations for cancer treatment. However, if various tube voltages are applied to take the patient’s CT image without applying the specific CT number to the electron density conversion curve, the accuracy of the dose calculation is not assured. In this study, changes in CT numbers for different materials due to changes in the tube voltage were demonstrated, and the dose calculation errors in the percentage depth dose (PDD), along with a clinical case were analyzed. The maximum dose difference in the PDD from the treatment planning system (TPS) dose calculation and from the Monte Carlo simulation were 1.3% and 1.1%, respectively, when applying the same CT number to the electron density conversion curve for the 80-kVp and 140-kVp images. In the clinical case, different CT number to electron density conversion curves at tube voltage of 80 kVp and 140 kVp were applied to the same image and the maximum differences in the mean, maximum, and minimum doses were 1.1%, 1.2%, and 1.0%, respectively, at the central region of the phantom and 0.6%, 0.9%, and 0.8%, respectively, at the peripheral region of the phantom.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. S. Fleming, Nucl. Med. Commun. 10, 83 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Burger, G. Goerres, S. Schoenes, A. Buck, A. H. Lonn and G. K. Von Schulthess, Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. I. 29, 922 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. C. T. Chantler, Q. Tran, Z. Barnea, D. Paterson, D. J. Cookson and D. X. Balaic, Phys. Rev. A 64, 062506 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. R. J. Cropp, P. Seslija, D. Tso and Y, Thakur, J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 14, 338 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. B. Saw, A. Loper, K. Komanduri, T. Combine, S. Hug and C. Scicutella, Med. Dosim. 30, 145 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. K. H. Cho et al., Korean. J. Med. Phys. 4, 161 (2005).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. S. Kang, B. Cho, H. Park and H. Bae, Korean. J. Med. Phys. 15, 23 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Agostinelli et al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 506, 250 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. J. Allison et al., IEEE. T. Nucl. Sci. 53, 270 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. S. K. Kang, M. W. Lee, Y. R. Kang, J. D. Hyeok, J. Y. Kim, K. K. Lee and M. S. Rock, New Phys.: Sae Mulli 62, 1357 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  11. F. C. du Plessis, C. A. Willemse, M. G. Lötter and L. Goedhals, Med. Phys. 28, 582 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dong Joo Rhee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rhee, D.J., Kim, Sw., Jeong, D.H. et al. Effects of the difference in tube voltage of the CT scanner on dose calculation. Journal of the Korean Physical Society 67, 123–128 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.67.123

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.67.123

Keywords

Navigation