Abstract
Psychological interventions, especially those leveraging mobile and wireless technologies, often include multiple components that are delivered and adapted on multiple timescales (e.g., coaching sessions adapted monthly based on clinical progress, combined with motivational messages from a mobile device adapted daily based on the person’s daily emotional state). The hybrid experimental design (HED) is a new experimental approach that enables researchers to answer scientific questions about the construction of psychological interventions in which components are delivered and adapted on different timescales. These designs involve sequential randomizations of study participants to intervention components, each at an appropriate timescale (e.g., monthly randomization to different intensities of coaching sessions and daily randomization to different forms of motivational messages). The goal of the current manuscript is twofold. The first is to highlight the flexibility of the HED by conceptualizing this experimental approach as a special form of a factorial design in which different factors are introduced at multiple timescales. We also discuss how the structure of the HED can vary depending on the scientific question(s) motivating the study. The second goal is to explain how data from various types of HEDs can be analyzed to answer a variety of scientific questions about the development of multicomponent psychological interventions. For illustration, we use a completed HED to inform the development of a technology-based weight loss intervention that integrates components that are delivered and adapted on multiple timescales.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bernacer, J., & Murillo, J. I. (2014). The Aristotelian conception of habit and its contribution to human neuroscience. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(November), 883–883. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00883
Boruvka, A., Almirall, D., Witkiewitz, K., & Murphy, S. A. (2018). Assessing time-varying causal effect moderation in Mobile health. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 113(523), 1112–1121.
Brumback, B. A. (2009). A note on using the estimated versus the known propensity score to estimate the average treatment effect. Statistics & Probability Letters, 79(4), 537–542.
Chakraborty, B., Collins, L. M., Strecher, V. J., & Murphy, S. A. (2009). Developing multicomponent interventions using fractional factorial designs. Statistics in Medicine, 28(21), 2687–2708.
Collins, L. M. (2018). Optimization of behavioral, biobehavioral, and biomedical interventions: The multiphase optimization strategy (MOST). Springer.
Collins, L. M., Dziak, J. J., & Li, R. (2009). Design of experiments with multiple independent variables: A resource management perspective on complete and reduced factorial designs. Psychological Methods, 14(3), 202–224. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015826
Collins, L. M., Murphy, S. A., Nair, V. N., & Strecher, V. J. (2005). A strategy for optimizing and evaluating behavioral interventions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 30(1), 65–73.
Dziak, J. J., Nahum-Shani, I., & Collins, L. M. (2012). Multilevel factorial experiments for developing behavioral interventions: Power, sample size, and resource considerations. Psychological Methods, 17(2), 153.
Dziak, J. J., Yap, J. R., Almirall, D., McKay, J. R., Lynch, K. G., & Nahum-Shani, I. (2019). A data analysis method for using longitudinal binary outcome data from a SMART to compare adaptive interventions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 54(5), 613–636.
Fernandez, M. E., Schlechter, C. R., Del Fiol, G., Gibson, B., Kawamoto, K., Siaperas, T., Pruhs, A., Greene, T., Nahum-Shani, I., & Schulthies, S. (2020). QuitSMART Utah: An implementation study protocol for a cluster-randomized, multi-level sequential multiple assignment randomized trial to increase reach and impact of tobacco cessation treatment in community health centers. Implementation Science, 15(1), 1–13.
Ghosh, P., Nahum-Shani, I., Spring, B., & Chakraborty, B. (2020). Noninferiority and equivalence tests in sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trials (SMARTs). Psychological Methods, 25(2), 182.
Hernan, M. A., Brumback, B. A., & Robins, J. M. (2002). Estimating the causal effect of zidovudine on CD4 count with a marginal structural model for repeated measures. Statistics in Medicine, 21(12), 1689–1709.
Hirano, K., Imbens, G. W., & Ridder, G. (2003). Efficient estimation of average treatment effects using the estimated propensity score. Econometrica, 71(4), 1161–1189.
Koch, E. D., Moukhtarian, T. R., Skirrow, C., Bozhilova, N., Asherson, P., & Ebner-Priemer, U. W. (2021). Using e-diaries to investigate ADHD–state-of-the-art and the promising feature of just-in-time-adaptive interventions. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 127, 884–898.
Lavori, P. W., & Dawson, R. (2000). A design for testing clinical strategies: Biased adaptive within-subject randomization. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 163(1), 29–38.
Liang, K. Y., & Zeger, S. L. (1986). Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika, 73(1): 13-22.
Liao, P., Klasnja, P., Tewari, A., & Murphy, S. A. (2016). Sample size calculations for micro-randomized trials in mHealth. Statistics in Medicine, 35(12), 1944–1971.
Lu, X., Nahum-Shani, I., Kasari, C., Lynch, K. G., Oslin, D. W., Pelham, W. E., Fabiano, G., & Almirall, D. (2016). Comparing dynamic treatment regimes using repeated-measures outcomes: Modeling considerations in SMART studies. Statistics in Medicine, 35(10), 1595–1615.
Mohr, D., Cuijpers, P., & Lehman, K. (2011). Supportive accountability: A model for providing human support to enhance adherence to eHealth interventions. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13(1), e30.
Murphy, S. A. (2005). An experimental design for the development of adaptive treatment strategies. Statistics in Medicine, 24(10), 1455–1481.
Nahum-Shani, I., & Almirall, D. (2019). An introduction to adaptive interventions and SMART designs in education. NCSER 2020-001. National Center for Special Education Research.
Nahum-Shani, I., Almirall, D., Yap, J. R., McKay, J. R., Lynch, K. G., Freiheit, E. A., & Dziak, J. J. (2020). SMART longitudinal analysis: A tutorial for using repeated outcome measures from SMART studies to compare adaptive interventions. Psychological Methods, 25(1), 1–29.
Nahum-Shani, I., & Dziak, J. J. (2018). Multilevel factorial designs in intervention development. In L. M. Collins & K. C. Kugler (Eds.), Optimization of behavioral, biobehavioral, and biomedical interventions: Advanced topics (pp. 47–87). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91776-4_3
Nahum-Shani, I., Dziak, J. J., & Collins, L. M. (2018). Multilevel factorial designs with experiment-induced clustering. Psychological Methods, 23(3), 458–479. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000128
Nahum-Shani, I., Dziak, J. J., Walton, M. A., & Dempsey, W. (2022a). Hybrid experimental designs for intervention development: What, why and how. Advances in Methods and Practices Psychological Science, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459221114279
Nahum-Shani, I., Dziak, J. J., & Wetter, D. W. (2022b). MCMTC: A pragmatic framework for selecting an experimental design to inform the development of digital interventions. Frontiers in Digital Health, 4.
Nahum-Shani, I., Hekler, E., & Spruijt-Metz, D. (2015). Building health behavior models to guide the development of just-in-time adaptive interventions: A pragmatic framework. Health Psychology, 34(Supp), 1209–1219.
Nahum-Shani, I., Qian, M., Almirall, D., Pelham, W. E., Gnagy, B., Fabiano, G. A., Waxmonsky, J. G., Yu, J., & Murphy, S. A. (2012a). Experimental design and primary data analysis methods for comparing adaptive interventions. Psychological Methods, 17(4), 457–477. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029372
Nahum-Shani, I., Qian, M., Almirall, D., Pelham, W. E., Gnagy, B., Fabiano, G. A., Waxmonsky, J. G., Yu, J., & Murphy, S. A. (2012b). Q-learning: A data analysis method for constructing adaptive interventions. Psychological Methods, 17(4), 478–494.
Nahum-Shani, I., Shaw, S. D., Carpenter, S. M., Murphy, S. A., & Yoon, C. (2022c). Engagement in digital interventions. American Psychologist, 77(7), 836–852
Nahum-Shani, I., Ertefaie, A., Lu, X., Lynch, K. G., McKay, J. R., Oslin, D. W., & Almirall, D. (2017). A SMART data analysis method for constructing adaptive treatment strategies for substance use disorders. Addiction, 112(5), 901–909.
Nair, V., Strecher, V., Fagerlin, A., Ubel, P., Resnicow, K., Murphy, S., Little, R., Chakraborty, B., & Zhang, A. (2008). Screening experiments and the use of fractional factorial designs in behavioral intervention research. American Journal of Public Health, 98(8), 1354–1359.
Oetting, A. I., Levy, J. A., Weiss, R. D., & Murphy, S. A. (2007). Statistical methodology for a SMART design in the development of adaptive treatment strategies. In P. Shrout, K. Keyes, & K. Ornstein (Eds.), Causality and psychopathology : Finding the determinants of disorders and their cures (pp. 179–205). Oxford University Press.
Orellana, L., Rotnitzky, A., & Robins, J. M. (2010). Dynamic regime marginal structural mean models for estimation of optimal dynamic treatment regimes, part I: Main content. International Journal of Biostatistics, 6(2), 8 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21969994
Pfammatter, A. F., Nahum-Shani, I., DeZelar, M., Scanlan, L., McFadden, H. G., Siddique, J., Hedeker, D., & Spring, B. (2019). SMART: Study protocol for a sequential multiple assignment randomized controlled trial to optimize weight loss management. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 82, 36–45.
Qian, T., Walton, A. E., Collins, L. M., Klasnja, P., Lanza, S. T., Nahum-Shani, I., Rabbi, M., Russell, M. A., Walton, M. A., & Yoo, H. (2022). The microrandomized trial for developing digital interventions: Experimental design and data analysis considerations. Psychological Methods, 27(5), 874–894.
Qian, T., Yoo, H., Klasnja, P., Almirall, D., & Murphy, S. A. (2020). Estimating time-varying causal excursion effects in mobile health with binary outcomes. Biometrika. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/asaa070
R Core Team (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
Ritterband, L. M., Thorndike, F. P., Cox, D. J., Kovatchev, B. P., & Gonder-Frederick, L. A. (2009). A behavior change model for internet interventions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 38(1), 18–27.
Robins, J., Orellana, L., & Rotnitzky, A. (2008). Estimation and extrapolation of optimal treatment and testing strategies. Statistics in Medicine, 27(23), 4678–4721. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3301
Schueller, S. M., Tomasino, K. N., & Mohr, D. C. (2017). Integrating human support into behavioral intervention technologies: The efficiency model of support. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 24(1), 27–45.
Spring, B., Pfammatter, A., Scanlan, L., McFadden HG, Marchese, S., Siddique, J., Hedeker, D., & Nahum-Shani, I. (2020). How low can we go? Optimal first line and augmentation treatment tactics for obesity stepped care. Obesity, 28(S2):(106), 216.
Stanger, C., Kowatsch, T., Xie, H., Nahum-Shani, I., Lim-Liberty, F., Anderson, M., Santhanam, P., Kaden, S., & Rosenberg, B. (2021). A digital health intervention (SweetGoals) for young adults with type 1 diabetes: Protocol for a factorial randomized trial. JMIR Research Protocols, 10(2), e27109.
Walton, A., Nahum-Shani, I., Crosby, L., Klasnja, P., & Murphy, S. (2018). Optimizing digital integrated care via micro-randomized trials. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 104(1), 53–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1079
Webb, C. A., & Cohen, Z. D. (2021). Progress towards clinically informative data-driven decision support tools in psychotherapy. The Lancet Digital Health, 3(4), e207–e208.
Wentzel, J., van der Vaart, R., Bohlmeijer, E. T., & van Gemert-Pijnen, J. E. (2016). Mixing online and face-to-face therapy: How to benefit from blended care in mental health care. JMIR Mental Health, 3(1), e9.
Funding
This work was funded by the National Institutes of Health, Grants U01 CA229437, P50 DA054039, R01 DA039901, and R01 DK108678
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Nahum-Shani, I., Dziak, J.J., Venera, H. et al. Design of experiments with sequential randomizations on multiple timescales: the hybrid experimental design. Behav Res 56, 1770–1792 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-023-02119-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-023-02119-z