Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A new sentence generator providing material for maximum reading speed measurement

  • Published:
Behavior Research Methods Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new method is proposed to generate text material for assessing maximum reading speed of adult readers. The described procedure allows one to generate a vast number of equivalent short sentences. These sentences can be displayed for different durations in order to determine the reader’s maximum speed using a psychophysical threshold algorithm. Each sentence is built so that it is either true or false according to common knowledge. The actual reading is verified by asking the reader to determine the truth value of each sentence. We based our design on the generator described by Crossland et al. and upgraded it. The new generator handles concepts distributed in an ontology, which allows an easy determination of the sentences’ truth value and control of lexical and psycholinguistic parameters. In this way many equivalent sentence can be generated and displayed to perform the measurement. Maximum reading speed scores obtained with pseudo-randomly chosen sentences from the generator were strongly correlated with maximum reading speed scores obtained with traditional MNREAD sentences (r = .836). Furthermore, the large number of sentences that can be generated makes it possible to perform repeated measurements, since the possibility of a reader learning individual sentences is eliminated. Researchers interested in within-reader performance variability could use the proposed method for this purpose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahn, S. J., Legge, G. E., & Luebker, A. (1995). Printed cards for measuring low-vision reading speed. Vision Research, 35(13), 1939–1944. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(94)00294-V

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1986). Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet, 327(8476), 307–310. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonin, P., Méot, A., Aubert, L., Malardier, N., Niedenthal, P., & Capelle-Toczek, M. C. (2003). Normes de concrétude, de valeur d'imagerie, de fréquence subjective et de valence émotionnelle pour 866 mots. L'Année Psychologique, 655–694. doi:10.3406/psy.2003.29658

  • Carver, R. P. (1990). Reading rate: A review of research and theory. Academic Press.

  • Crossland, M., Legge, G., & Dakin, S. (2008). The development of an automated sentence generator for the assessment of reading speed. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 4(1), 14. doi:10.1186/1744-9081-4-14

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, A. (1992). Reading from paper versus screens: A critical review of the empirical literature. Ergonomics, 35(10), 1297–1326. doi:10.1080/00140139208967394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, M. C. (2004). How physical text layout affects reading from screen. Behaviour & Information Technology, 23(6), 377–393. doi:10.1080/01449290410001715714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egidi, G., & Gerrig, R. J. (2009). How valence affects language processing: Negativity bias and mood congruence in narrative comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 37(5), 547–555. doi:10.3758/MC.37.5.547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forster, K. (1970). Visual perception of rapidly presented word sequences of varying complexity. Perception & Psychophysics, 8(4), 215–221. doi:10.3758/BF03210208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, W. G. (2004). Bias in Bland-Altman but not regression validity analyses. Sportscience, 8(4).

  • Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., Keller, T. A., Eddy, W. F., & Thulborn, K. R. (1996). Brain activation modulated by sentence comprehension. Science, 274(5284), 114–116. doi:10.1126/science.274.5284.114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kendeou, P., & van den Broek, P. (2007). The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts. Memory & Cognition, 35(7), 1567–1577. doi:10.3758/BF03193491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kliegl, R., Grabner, E., Rolfs, M., & Engbert, R. (2004). Length, frequency, and predictability effects of words on eye movements in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1-2), 262–284. doi:10.1080/09541440340000213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landerl, K., & Wimmer, H. (2008). Development of word reading fluency and spelling in a consistent orthography: An 8-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 150. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latham, K., & Whitaker, D. (1996). A comparison of word recognition and reading performance in foveal and peripheral vision. Vision Research, 36(17), 2665–2674. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(96)00022-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Legge, G. E., Ross, J. A., Luebker, A., & LaMay, J. M. (1989). Psychophysics of reading. VIII. The Minnesota Low-Vision Reading Test. OptomVis Sci, 66(12), 843–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemaire, B., Guérin-Dugué, A., Baccino, T., Chanceaux, M., & Pasqualotti, L. (2011). A cognitive computational model of eye movements investigating visual strategies on textual material. cogSci 2011 Proceedings, 1146–1151.

  • New, B., Pallier, C., Ferrand, L., & Matos, R. (2001). Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet: LEXIQUE. L'Année Psychologique, 447–462. doi:10.3406/psy.2001.1341

  • Pelli, D. G., Burns, C. W., Farell, B., & Moore-Page, D. C. (2006). Feature detection and letter identification. Vision Research, 46(28), 4646–4674. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2006.04.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K., Slattery, T. J., & Bélanger, N. N. (2010). Eye movements, the perceptual span, and reading speed. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(6), 834–839. doi:10.3758/PBR.17.6.834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, H., & Monro, S. (1951). A Stochastic Approximation Method. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 22(3). doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729586

  • Sadoski, M. (2001). Resolving the effects of concreteness on interest, comprehension, and learning important ideas from text. Educational Psychology Review, 13(3), 263–281. doi:10.1023/A:1016675822931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiple, W., Szlyk, J. P., McMahon, T., Pulido, J., & Fishman, G. A. (2005). Eye-movement training for reading in patients with age-related macular degeneration. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 46(8), 2886–2896. doi:10.1167/iovs.04-1296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senécal, M. J., Gresset, J., & Overbury, O. (2006). Minnesota Low-Vision Reading Test, version française: Échelle d’acuité visuelle MNREAD. Longueuil: Institut Nazareth & Louis-Braille.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sereno, S. C., & Rayner, K. (2003). Measuring word recognition in reading: Eye movements and event-related potentials. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(11), 489–493. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.09.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Rand Corporation.

  • Staub, A. (2010). Eye movements and processing difficulty in object relative clauses. Cognition, 116(1), 71–86. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.04.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trauzettel-Klosinski, S., Dietz, K., & the IReST Study Group. (2012). Standardized assessment of reading performance: The New International Reading Speed Texts IReST. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 53(9), 5452–5461. doi:10.1167/iovs.11-8284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treutwein, B. (1995). Adaptive psychophysical procedures. Vision Research, 35(17), 2503–2522. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(95)00016-X

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Essilor International. The authors would like to thank Catherine Agathos, Delphine Tranvouez, and William Seiple for the proofreading and Jean Lieber for the advice about the use of ontology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CHArt/LUTIN (EA 4004), Paris 8 University, Paris, France

    Jean-Luc Perrin & Thierry Baccino

  2. World R&D Optics Department, Vision Science Department, Essilor International, 13 rue Moreau, Paris, 75012, France

    Jean-Luc Perrin & Damien Paillé

Authors
  1. Jean-Luc Perrin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Damien Paillé
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Thierry Baccino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Luc Perrin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Perrin, JL., Paillé, D. & Baccino, T. A new sentence generator providing material for maximum reading speed measurement. Behav Res 47, 1055–1064 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0521-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0521-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation