Skip to main content
Log in

Processes of incremental message planning during conversation

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Speaking begins with the formulation of an intended preverbal message and linguistic encoding of this information. The transition from thought to speech occurs incrementally, with cascading planning at subsequent levels of production. In this article, we aim to specify the mechanisms that support incremental message preparation. We contrast two hypotheses about the mechanisms responsible for incorporating message-level information into a linguistic plan. According to the Initial Preparation view, messages can be encoded as fluent utterances if all information is ready before speaking begins. By contrast, on the Continuous Incrementality view, messages can be continually prepared and updated throughout the production process, allowing for fluent production even if new information is added to the message while speaking is underway. Testing these hypotheses, eye-tracked speakers in two experiments produced unscripted, conjoined noun phrases with modifiers. Both experiments showed that new message elements can be incrementally incorporated into the utterance even after articulation begins, consistent with a Continuous Incrementality view of message planning, in which messages percolate to linguistic encoding immediately as that information becomes available in the mind of the speaker. We conclude by discussing the functional role of incremental message planning in conversational speech and the situations in which this continuous incremental planning would be most likely to be observed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We used speech onset as a reference point, since it unambiguously marks the time when the pre-speech encoding of NP1 must be completed.

  2. An alternative characterization of our findings is that speakers engaged in covert error correction when the initial linguistic plan no longer matched the updated message. According to this view, speakers must re-design the linguistic plan for NP1 or NP2. Inconsistent with this account, however, is the fact that we found no indications of linguistic re-planning or repairs in the surface form of late-planned message updates.

References

  • Allum, P. H., & Wheeldon, L. R. (2007). Planning scope in spoken sentence production: The role of grammatical units. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 791–810. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.4.791

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255–278. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumenthal, A. L. (1970). Language and psychology: Historical aspects of psycholinguistics. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, J. K. (1982). Toward a cognitive psychology of syntax: Information processing contributions to sentence formulation. Psychological Review, 89, 1–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bock, K., Irwin, D. E., Davidson, D. J., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2003). Minding the clock. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 653–685. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00007-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436. doi:10.1163/156856897X00357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown-Schmidt, S., & Konopka, A. E. (2008). Little houses and casas pequeñas: Message formulation and syntactic form in unscripted speech with speakers of English and Spanish. Cognition, 109, 274–280.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown-Schmidt, S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2006). Watching the eyes when talking about size: An investigation of message formulation and utterance planning. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 592–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobel, C., Gumnior, H., Bolte, J., & Zwitserlood, P. (2007). Describing scenes hardly seen. Acta Psychologica, 125, 129–143.

  • Ferreira, V. S., & Pashler, H. (2002). Central bottleneck influences on the processing stages of word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 1187–1199. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.28.6.1187

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, F., & Swets, B. (2002). How incremental is language production? Evidence from the production of utterances requiring the computation of arithmetic sums. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 57–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleitman, L. R., January, D., Nappa, R., & Trueswell, J. C. (2007). On the give and take between event apprehension and utterance formulation. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 544–569.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, Z. M. (2001). Gaze durations during speech reflect word selection and phonological encoding. Cognition, 82, B1–B14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, Z. M. (2003). A reversed word length effect in coordinating the preparation and articulation of words in speaking. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 603–609.

  • Griffin, Z. M., & Bock, K. (2000). What the eyes say about speaking. Psychological Science, 11, 274–279.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hafri, A., Papafragou, A., & Trueswell, J. C. (2013). Getting the gist of events: recognition of two-participant actions from brief displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 142, 880–905. doi:10.1037/a0030045

  • Konopka, A. E. (2012). Planning ahead: How recent experience with structures and words changes the scope of linguistic planning. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 143–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konopka, A. E., & Meyer, A. S. (2014). Priming sentence planning. Cognitive Psychology, 73, 1–40. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2014.04.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuchinsky, S. E., Bock, K., & Irwin, D. E. (2011). Reversing the hands of time: Changing the mapping from seeing to saying. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 748–756.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lashley, K. S. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In L. A. Jeffress (Ed.), Cerebral mechanisms in behavior (pp. 112–131). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E.-K., Brown-Schmidt, S., & Watson, D. G. (2013). Ways of looking ahead: Hierarchical planning in language production. Cognition, 129, 544–562. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.08.007

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. C., Crowther, J. E., Knight, M., Tamborello, F. P., & Yang, C.-L. (2010). Planning in sentence production: Evidence for the phrase as a default planning scope. Cognition, 116, 177–192.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, A. S. (1996). Lexical access in phrase and sentence production: Results from picture–word interference experiments. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 477–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, A. S., Belke, E., Häcker, C., & Mortensen, L. (2007). Use of word length information in utterance planning. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 210–231. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220–244. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, H. (1880). Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte [Principles of the history of language]. Leipzig, Germany: Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roelofs, A., & Piai, V. (2011). Attention demands of spoken word planning: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(307), 1–14. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00307

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D. A., Cohen, R. G., Jax, S. A., Weiss, D. J., & van der Wel, R. (2007). The problem of serial order in behavior: Lashley’s legacy. Human Movement Science, 26, 525–554.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rossion, B., & Pourtois, G. (2004). Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart’s object pictorial set: The role of surface detail in basic-level object recognition. Perception, 33, 217–236. doi:10.1068/p5117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sedivy, J. C. (2005). Evaluating explanations for referential context effects: Evidence for Gricean mechanisms in online language interpretation. In J. C. Trueswell & M. K. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Approaches to studying world-situated language use: Bridging the language-as-product and language-as-action traditions (pp. 345–364). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M., & Wheeldon, L. (1999). High-level processing scope in spoken sentence production. Cognition, 73, 205–246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, V., Jescheniak, J. D., & Schriefers, H. (2010). On the flexibility of grammatical advance planning during sentence production: Effects of cognitive load on multiple lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 423–440.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wundt, W. (1900). Völkerpsychologie: Vols. 1–2. Die Sprache [Language]. Leipzig, Germany: Kröner-Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author note

We thank Franklin Chang for helpful discussions, and Tatsuya Shigeta and Stephanie Gnatek for help with data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah Brown-Schmidt.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 496 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brown-Schmidt, S., Konopka, A.E. Processes of incremental message planning during conversation. Psychon Bull Rev 22, 833–843 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0714-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0714-2

Keywords

Navigation