Skip to main content
Log in

Dead-Time Pseudo-Compensation for Improvement of Accurate Characteristics of a Continuous Control System with Correction According CP a Smith Predictor

  • Analysis and Synthesis of Signals and Images
  • Published:
Optoelectronics, Instrumentation and Data Processing Aims and scope

Abstract

This paper describes the use of a cascade compensator constructed according to a Smith scheme in the forward loop of a system being designed for the purpose of analyzing the quality of processes in steady states. This can be effectively used to solve the problem of providing the system with a required reserve of stability by placing a dead-time element outside a closed loop. The dead-time effect manifests only when the transient time increases by the value of dead time with no changes in the overshoot value. It is determined that the velocity Q-factor of the system with a cascade compensator constructed according to a Smith scheme theoretically cannot be larger than the reciprocal of the dead time. This paper also demonstrates the possibility of reducing this negative property of the cascade compensator constructed according to a Smith scheme by dead-time pseudo-compensation with the use of differentiating elements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. P. Kim, “Determination of the Desired Transfer Function in the Synthesis of Control Systems by an Algebraic Method,” Mekhatronika, Avtomatizatsiya, Upravlenie, No. 5, 15–21 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  2. N. A. Vunder and A. V. Ushakov, “Sensitivity Analysis of Systems with a Cascade Compensator Embedded in a Smith Predictor to Dead-Time Variation,” Avtometriya 52 (3), 71–78 (2014) [Optoelectron., Instrum. Data Process. 52 (3), 274–279 (2014)].

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Ajmeri and A. Ali, “Analytical Design of Modified Smith Predictor for Unstable Second-Order Processes with Time Delay,” Intern. J. Syst. Sci. 48 (8), 1671–1681 (2017).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. G. Lloyds Raja and A. Ali, “Smith Predictor Based Parallel Cascade Control Strategy for Unstable and Integrating Processes with Large Time Delay,” J. Process Control. 52, 57–65 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. V. A. Besekerskii and E. P. Popov, Theory of Automatic Control Systems (Professiya, Saint-Petersburg, 2003) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  6. F. M. Brasch, Jr. Pearson, and J. B. Pearson, “Pole Placement Using Dynamic Compensators,” IEEE Trans. Automat. Control. 15 (1), 34–43 (1970).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. O. J. Smith, “Close Control of Loops with Dead Time,” Chem. Eng. Progress. 53 (5), 217–235 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  8. O. J. Smith, “A Controller to Overcome Dead Time,” ISA J. 6 (2), 28–32 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  9. K. J. Astróm, C. C. Hang, and B. C. Lim, “A New Smith Predictor for Controlling a Process with an Integrator and Long Deadtime,” IEEE Trans. Automat. Control. 39 (2), 343–345 (1994).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. S. Majhi and D. Atherton, “A New Smith Predictor and Controller for Unstable and Integrating Processes with Time Delay,” in Proc. of the 37th IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control, Tampa, USA (IEEE, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. W. Olbrot, “Finite Spectrum Property and Predictors,” in Proc. of the 1st IFAC Workshop on Linear Time Delay Systems, Grenoble, France, 1998. Vol. 31, No. 19, 203–212 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Z. J. Palmor, “Time-Delay Compensation — Smith Predictor and Its Modifications,” in The Control Handbook, Ed. by W. S. Levine (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  13. L. A. Zadeh and Ch. A. Desoer, Linear System Theory: The State Space Approach (Dover Publications, New York, 2008).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. S. J. Mason, “Feedback Theory — Further Properties of Signal Flow Graphs,” Proc. IRE 44 (7), 920–926 (1956).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. A. V. Oppenheim, A. S. Willsky, and H. S. Nawab, Signals and Systems (Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. A. Vunder.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © N.A. Vunder, M.M. Sinetova, A.V. Ushakov, 2018, published in Avtometriya, 2018, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 114–123.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vunder, N.A., Sinetova, M.M. & Ushakov, A.V. Dead-Time Pseudo-Compensation for Improvement of Accurate Characteristics of a Continuous Control System with Correction According CP a Smith Predictor. Optoelectron.Instrument.Proc. 54, 97–104 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3103/S8756699018010156

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S8756699018010156

Keywords

Navigation