Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of Electrochemical Passivation on Burr Suppression of Ti–4Al–6V Alloy during Machining

  • Published:
Surface Engineering and Applied Electrochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Formation of burr at the entry and exit of a hole is a common problem in drilling operations. Especially in drilling of the Ti–4Al–6V alloy, the entry burr is a major concern, which reduces the fatigue life of the components. In this study, Ti–4Al–6V alloy plates were drilled to investigate the effect of electrochemical treatment as well as the machining parameters on the drilling burr formation. Different test pieces were electrochemically treated in an electrochemical cell for time durations from 30 min to 75 min, with the cutting speed and feed rate varying in the range of varying in a range of 100–200 m/min and 0.01–0.05 mm/rev, respectively. As a result of the electrochemical treatment, the hardness was of 621 HV at 10 mN loading for the duration of 60 minutes. Moreover, the hardness was found to be 521 HV at 100 mN loading. Based on the hardness value and SEM micrographs, the 60 minutes electrochemically treated workpiece shows remarkable improvement in the burr formation. The magnified view of the circumference of the drilled hole shows a reduced burr for 60 minutes treated Ti–4Al–6V alloy workpiece.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Dornfeld, D.A., Kim, J.S., Dechow, H., Hewson, J., et al., CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol., 1999, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 73–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)63134-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cantero, J.L., Tardio, M.M., Canteli, J.A., Marcos, M.M., et al., Int. Mach. Tool Manuf., 2005, vol. 45, no. 11, pp. 1246–1255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2005.01.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang, P.F., Churi, N.J., Pei, Z.J., and Treadwell, C., Mach. Sci. Technol., 2008, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 417–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/10910340802519379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Das, K., Eynin, M., and Wretland, A., High Speed Mach., 2017, vol. 3, nos. 1–10, pp. 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1515/hsm-2017-0002

  5. Pecata, O. and Brinksmeiera, E., Proc. CIRP, 2014, p. 13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.04.001

  6. Patil, R., Shinde, S., Marla, D., and Joshi, S., Int. J. Mechatron. Manuf. Syst., 2016, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMMS.2016.079591

    Google Scholar 

  7. Abdelhafeez, A.M., Soo, S.L., Aspinwall, D.K., Dowson, A., et al., Proc. CIRP, 2015, vol. 37, pp. 230–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.08.019

  8. Shakeel, A.L., Govindaraju, N., and Pradeep Kumar, M., Mater. Manuf. Process., 2016, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 603–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2015.1019127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sharif, S. and Rahim, E.A., J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2007, vol. 185, pp. 72–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.03.142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nithin, T.M. and Vijayaraghavan, L., Mater. Manuf. Process., 2017, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2016.1176179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sun, D., Lemoine, P., Keys, D., Doyle, P., et al., Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2016, vol. 94, nos. 5–8, pp. 1719–1726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9850-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhu, Z., Sui, S., Sun, J., Li, J., et al., Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2017, vol. 93, nos. 1–4, pp. 651–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0508-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Skoczypiec, S., Grabowski, M., and Ruszaj, A., Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2016, vol. 86, pp. 1873–1880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-8320-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu, X., Chu, P.K., and Ding, C., Mater. Sci. Eng., R, 2004, vol. 47, pp. 49–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2004.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEGMENTS

The authors would like to thank the Nanomaterial Research Lab, Surface Engineering Division, National Aerospace Laboratory, Bangalore, for providing nano-indentation facilities. We are further thankful to the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Government College of Engineering, Salem, for providing SEM facilities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Thanigaivelan.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thanigaivelan, R., Arunachalam, R., Madhan, C. et al. Impact of Electrochemical Passivation on Burr Suppression of Ti–4Al–6V Alloy during Machining. Surf. Engin. Appl.Electrochem. 55, 424–429 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3103/S106837551904015X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S106837551904015X

Keywords:

Navigation