Skip to main content
Log in

Imunogenetics for Application in Ram Evaluation Based on Progeny Performance

  • ANIMAL SCIENCE AND VETERINARY MEDICINE
  • Published:
Russian Agricultural Sciences Aims and scope

Abstract

The surveys were carried out in order to determine the ram ranks, taking into consideration the outcomes of genetic tests for validating the origin of pedigree young stock of fine-wool and semicoarsewool sheep. The immunogenetics tests for six systems, including 14 blood-group red-cell antigens, were performed with monospecific reagents of a blood bank in the immunogenetics and DNA-technology laboratory, All-Russia Research Institute of Sheep and Goat Breeding. According to the evaluation outcomes, the discrepancies in the progeny origin records were minor. The reliability of the paternal lineages for the fine-wool sheep of the Khangil type and the semicourse wool sheep of the Zugalai type comprised 91.9 and 91.7%, respectively, while the reliability of maternal linages for both breeds was 100.0%. The average liveweight and the wool clip in the nominal progeny produced from the proven fine-wool rams comprised 28.1 ± 0.27 kg and 2.12 ± 0.05 kg, respectively, while the similar parameters for the true progeny comprised 28.8 ± 0.41 kg and 2.10 ± 0.03 kg, respectively. With respect to the semicoarse wool rams, the similar parameters comprised 32.1 ± 0.42 kg and 1.47 ± 0.02 kg for the nominal progeny, respectively, and 31.6 ± 0.32 kg and 1.47 ± 0.03 kg for the true progeny, respectively. The ram evaluation based on the nominal ewe progeny performance showed that fine-wool ram no. 56137 was a disimprover for a liveweight trait (td = –1.95), while ram no. 9036 was an improver for it (td = 2.12). With respect to the true progeny, both rams were neutral. The semicoarse wool rams evaluated based on the nominal daughter liveweight were assigned to the neutral category (td 1.46 and td = –1.65, respectively). With respect to the true progeny performance, ram no. 06598 was assigned to improvers (td = 3.47), while ram no. 08992 was considered a disimprover (td = –3.91). All the rams evaluated based on their total progeny washed-wool clip were considered neutral. The Bd and Da antigens may be recognized as the potential markers for high meat and wool production performance, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Aboneev, V.V., Shumaenko, S.N., and Larionov, R.P., Meat products and quality of mutton of different genotypes, Ovtsy, Kozy, Sherst. Delo, 2012, no. 3, pp. 36–38.

  2. Deeva, V.S. and Sukhova, N.O., Gruppy krovi krupnogo rogatogo skota i ikh selektsionnoe znachenie: monografiya (Blood Groups of Cattle and their Selection Value: Monograph), Novosibirsk: Sib. Otd. Ross. Acad. S-Kh. Nauk, 2002.

  3. Okhapkin, S.K. and Kochergin, N.A., Analysis of breeding and genetic processes in the herd, Vestn. Ross. Acad. S-kh. Nauk, 1993, no. 4, pp. 54–56.

  4. Chizhova, L.N., Prediction of the breeding value of sheep using biochemical markers, Ovtsy, Kozy, Sherst. Delo, 2004, no. 2, pp. 1–3.

  5. Ol'khovskaya, L.V., Silkina, S.F., Marutyants, N.G., et al., Regularities of inheritance of high productivity of sheep by genetic parameters of blood, Vet. Patol., 2013, no. 1, pp. 68–70.

  6. Kopylov, I.A., Skorykh, L.N., and Efimova, N.I., Features of the immunogenetic composition of the blood of sheep of different genotypes, Vestn. APK Stavrop., 2017, no. 25, vol. 1, pp. 92–94.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Degtyarev, D.Y., Skorykh, L.N., Kovalenko, D.V., et al., Using genetic markers in breeding sheep, Res. J. Pharm., Biol. Chem. Sci., 2016, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 2137–2139.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Moiseikina, L.G., Ecological and genetic substantiation of sheep breeding in Kalmykia, Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, Dubrovitsy, 2000.

  9. Rosenberg, N.A, Burke, T., Elo, K., et al., Empirical evaluation of genetic clustering methods using multilocus genotypes from 20 chicken breeds, Genetics, 2001, vol. 159, no. 2, pp. 699–713.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lyutskanov, P.I., Mashner, O.A., Evtodienko, S.A., et al., Genetic characteristics of the Karakul sheep of Moldova, Rozvedennya Genet. Tvarin, 2010, no. 44, pp. 122–128.

  11. Chizhova, L.N., Aboneev, V.V., Surov, A.I., et al., Genetic markers in sheep breeding Ovtsy, Kozy, Sherst. Delo, 2014, no. 2, pp. 11–13.

  12. Novikov, A.V., Compatibility of heredity of servicing bulls in cattle population, Agrar. Vestn. Urala, 2012, no. 11, pp. 40–43.

  13. Rusin, M.N., Novikov, A.V., and Romanovskaya, A.R., Sizes of the constitution of animals of herd of LLC Mezenskoye, Agrar. Vestn. Urala, 2015, no. 11, pp. 30–33.

  14. Zhivotovskii, L.A. and Mashurov, A.M., Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po statisticheskomu analizu immunogeneticheskikh dannykh dlya ispol’zovaniya v selektsii zhivotnykh (Guidelines for the Statistical Analysis of Immunogenetic Data for Use in Animal Breeding), Dubrovitsy: Vseross. Inst. Zhivotnovod., 1974.

  15. Yakovenko, A.M., Antonenko, T.I., and Selionova, M.I., Biometricheskie metody analiza kachestvennykh i kolichestvennykh priznakov v zootekhnii: uchebnoe posobie (Biometric Methods for the Analysis of Qualitative and Quantitative Traits in Animal Science: Manual), Stavropol: AGRUS, 2013.

  16. Aboneev, V.V., Egorov, M.V., and Chizhova, L.N., The use of genetic parameters of blood in the assessment of servicing rams by the quality of offspring, Collect. Sci. Pap. Stavrop. Res. Inst. Livest. Forage Prod., 2003, vol. 1, no. 1–1, pp. 117–119.

  17. Selionova, M.I., Silkina, S.F., and Chernov, V.V., The use of the method of genetic examination of the reliability of the offspring origin in assessing the quality of stud rams, Collect. Sci. Pap. Stavrop. Res. Inst. Livest. Forage Prod., 2004, vol. 2, no. 1-1, pp. 102–106.

  18. Aboneev, V.V., Immunogenetika v selektsii ovets: monografiya (Immunogenetics in Sheep Breeding: Monograph), Stavropol: Vseross. Nauchno-Issled. Inst. Ovtsevod. Kozovod., 2004.

  19. Ol'khovskaya, L.V., Silkina, S.F., Marutyants, N.G., et al., Regularities of inheritance of high productivity of sheep by genetic parameters in blood, Vet. Patol., 2013, no. 1, pp. 68–70.

  20. Trukhachev, V.I. and Selionova, M.I., Use of immunogenetic markers in sheep selection and reproduction, Vestn. APK Stavrop., 2013, vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 88–91.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Marchenko, V.V., Immunogenetic characteristics of Manych Merino sheep breed, Vet. Zootekh. Biotekhnol., 2017, no. 5, pp. 38–42.

  22. Selionova, M.I., Immune and molecular genetic markers and their use in sheep breeding, Collect. Sci. Pap. Stavrop. Res. Inst. Livest. Forage Prod., 2007, vol. 3, no. 3-3, pp. 3–8.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. N. Khamiruev.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest. The author declares that he has no conflicts of interest.

Statement on the welfare of animals. All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Additional information

Translated by O. Zhiryakova

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khamiruev, T.N. Imunogenetics for Application in Ram Evaluation Based on Progeny Performance. Russ. Agricult. Sci. 47, 621–626 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068367421060057

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068367421060057

Keywords:

Navigation