Skip to main content
Log in

FAO AquaCrop Model Performance: in Green Canopy Cover, Soil Moisture and Production of Maize at Middle and Lower Reaches Plain of Yangtze River of China

  • MELIORATION
  • Published:
Russian Agricultural Sciences Aims and scope

Abstract

Crop water productivity models are valuable tools for investigate the crop responses to the water-management strategies and ameliorate the efficiency of water use in agriculture. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of AquaCrop model for maize crop (Zea mays L.) under full, excessive and deficit applications of drip irrigation in semi-humid region of China. The evaluation results emphasized the model accuracy in simulations CC, SWC, B*, Y and WUE with satisfactory performance in full irrigation, and moderate water stressed treatment T2 of 75% of full irrigation. This accuracy declines in circumstances of excessive irrigation T1 of 125% of full irrigation, and high water stressed T3 of 50% of full irrigation. The RMSEs and NRMSEs in simulated CC, and SWC for full irrigation, T1, T2 and T3 treatments were 7.3–8.6, 6.3–7.2, 5.4–6.3 and 4.9–5.6% CC, respectively, and 9.4–4.8, 16.1–8.1, 16.4–9.3 and 20.9–13.4% SWC, respectively. Whereas, the D-index and R2 of CC varied between 0.72 to 0.89 and 0.99 to 1.0, while in the SWC varied between 0.54 to 0.83 and 0.48 to 0.96 for the four irrigation treatments. The differences (S.D) in final biomass and grain yield were within the range of 0.23 to 4.45% and 0.30 to 1.46% between the measurement and simulation. Simulated WUEs of biomass and yield under different irrigation treatments ranged between 6.07 to 6.52 kg/m3 and 3.07 to 3.16 kg/m3, AquaCrop’s performance trends to underestimate the WUEs of biomass and yield, and emphasizes that the yield WUE increased linearly with water stress condition increased.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Hsiao, T.C., Heng, L., Steduto, P., Rojas-Lara, B., Raes, D., and Fereres, E., AquaCrop—the FAO crop model to simulate yield response to water, III. Parameterization and testing for maize, Agron. J., 2009, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 448–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Raes, D., Steduto, P., Hsiao, T., and Fereres, E., AquaCrop—The FAO Crop Model to Simulate Yield Response to Water: Reference Manual Annexes, 2009. https://www.fao.org/nr/water/aquacrop.html.

  3. Steduto, P., Hsiao, T.C., Raes, D., and Fereres, E., Aquacrop—The FAO crop model to simulate yield response to water: I. Concepts and underlying principles, Agron. J., 2009, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 426–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Raes, D., Steduto, P., Hsiao, T.C., and Fereres, E., AquaCrop—The FAO crop model to simulate yield response to water: II. Main algorithms and software description, Agron. J., 2009, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 438–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Doorenbos, J. and Kassam, A., Yield response to water, Irrig. Drain. Pap., 1979, vol. 33, p. 257.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mkhabela, M.S. and Bullock, P.R., Performance of the FAO AquaCrop model for wheat grain yield and soil moisture simulation in Western Canada, Agric. Water Manage., 2012, vol. 110, pp. 16–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Vanuytrecht, E., Raes, D., Steduto, P., Hsiao, T.C., Fereres, E., Heng, L.K., Vila, M.G., and Moreno, P.M., AquaCrop: FAO’s crop water productivity and yield response model, Environ. Modell. Software, 2014, vol. 62, pp. 351–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Heng, L.K., Evett, S.R., Howell, T.A., and Hsiao, T.C., Calibration and testing of FAO aquacrop model for rainfed and irrigated maize, Agron. J., 2009, vol. 101, pp. 488–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Salemi, H., Soom, M.A.M., Mousavi, S.F., Ganji, A., Lee, T.S., Yusoff, M.K., and Verdinejad, V.R., Irrigated silage maize yield and water productivity response to deficit irrigation in an arid region, Pol. J. Environ. Stud., 2011, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 1295–1303.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Flores-Gallardo, H., Ojeda-Bustamante, W., Flores-Magdaleno, H., Sifuentes-Ibarra, E., and Mejia-Saenz, E., Simulation of corn (Zea mays L.) yield in Northern Sinaloa using the Aquacrop model, Agro Cienc. Mex., 2013, vol. 47, pp. 347–359.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mhizha, T., Geerts, S., Vanuytrecht, E., Makarau, A., and Raes, D., Use of the FAO AquaCrop model in developing sowing guidelines for rainfed maize in Zimbabwe, Water SA, 2014, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 233–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Greaves, G.E. and Wang, Y.M., Assessment of FAO AquaCrop model for simulating maize growth and productivity under deficit irrigation in a tropical environment, Water-SUI, 2016, vol. 8, no. 12, p. 557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Farahani, H.J., Izzi, G., and Oweis, T.Y., Parameterization and evaluation of the AquaCrop model for full and deficit irrigated cotton, Agron. J., 2009, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 469–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Stricevic, R., Cosic, M., Djurovic, N., Pejic, B., and Maksimovic, L., Assessment of the FAO AquaCrop model in the simulation of rainfed and supplementally irrigated maize, sugar beet and sunflower, Agric. Water Manage., 2011, vol. 98, no. 10, pp. 1615–1621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D., and Smith, M., Crop evapotranspiration—guidelines for computing crop water requirements, Irrig. Drain. Pap., 1998, vol. 56.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Araya, A., Habtu, S., Hadgu, K.M., Kebede, A., and Dejene, T., Test of AquaCrop model in simulating biomass and yield of water deficient and irrigated barley (Hordeum vulgare), Agric. Water Manage., 2010, vol. 97, no. 11, pp. 1838–1846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Loague, K. and Green, R.E., Statistical and graphical methods for evaluating solute transport models: Overview and application, J. Contam. Hydrol., 1991, vol. 7, nos. 1–2, pp. 51–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bouman, B. and Van Laar, H., Description and evaluation of the rice growth model ORYZA2000 under nitrogen-limited conditions, Agric. Syst., 2006, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 249–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rinaldi, M., Garofalo, P., Rubino, P., and Steduto, P., Processing tomatoes under different irrigation regimes in Southern Italy: Agronomic and economic assessments in a simulation case study, J. Agrometeorol., 2011, vol. 3, pp. 39–56.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zeleke, K.T., Luckett, D., and Cowley, R., Calibration and testing of the FAO AquaCrop model for canola, Agron. J., 2011, vol. 103, no. 6, pp. 1610–1618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ahmadi, S.H., Mosallaeepour, E., Kamgar-Haghighi, A.A., and Sepaskhah, A.R., Modeling maize yield and soil water content with AquaCrop under full and deficit irrigation managements, Water Resour. Manage., 2015, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 2837–2853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Biazin, B. and Stroosnijder, L., To tie or not to tie ridges for water conservation in Rift Valley drylands of Ethiopia, Soil Tillage Res., 2012, vol. 124, pp. 83–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mebane, V.J., Day, R.L., Hamlett, J.M., Watson, J.E., and Roth, G.W., Validating the FAO AquaCrop model for rainfed Maize in Pennsylvania, Agron. J., 2013, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 419–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Iqbal, M.A., Shen, Y., Stricevic, R., Pei, H., Sun, H., Amiri, E., Penas, A., and del Rio, S., Evaluation of the FAO AquaCrop model for winter wheat on the North China Plain under deficit irrigation from field experiment to regional yield simulation, Agric. Water Manage., 2014, vol. 135, pp. 61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Katerji, N., Campi, P., and Mastrorilli, M., Productivity, evapotranspiration, and water use efficiency of corn and tomato crops simulated by AquaCrop under contrasting water stress conditions in the Mediterranean region, Agric. Water Manage., 2013, vol. 130, pp. 14–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors of the paper express their gratitude to School of Hydraulic, Energy and Power Engineering at Yangzhou University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. A. M. Abdalhi.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. This article does not contain any studies involving animals or human participants performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

The article is published in the original.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdalhi, M.A., Jia, Z., Luo, W. et al. FAO AquaCrop Model Performance: in Green Canopy Cover, Soil Moisture and Production of Maize at Middle and Lower Reaches Plain of Yangtze River of China. Russ. Agricult. Sci. 45, 186–193 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068367419020162

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068367419020162

Keywords:

Navigation