Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Statistical Analysis of the Distribution of Impurities during Copper Electrorefining

  • METALLURGY OF NONFERROUS METALS
  • Published:
Russian Journal of Non-Ferrous Metals Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Electrolytic copper refining allows one to obtain high-purity copper, so analyzing the main ways impurities transition into electrolysis products is a relevant problem. Solving it makes it possible to control the process when changing the composition of raw materials and, as a result, the content of impurities in the anodes. In this work, on the basis of a complex analysis and synchronization of a large array of data on impurity concentrations in various industrial environments obtained on a series of commercial cells, the directions of the flow of impurities is determined and the relationship between the content of impurities in the different products of the electrolysis (slime, electrolyte, and copper cathode) is established. It is shown that the transition of impurities from one process medium (source) to another (receiver) occurs by four main schemes: linear increase, no visible dependence, the presence of the limit concentration in the receiver, and the presence of the threshold concentration in the source. The results of a statistical analysis of the distribution of six impurities (bismuth, arsenic, lead, sulfur, nickel, and silver) belonging to different groups are presented in four main pairs of the impurity source–receiver: anode–solution, anode–slime, slime–cathode, and solution–cathode. For all dependencies of the impurity concentration in the source on the content in the receiver, the coefficients of linear regression equations are determined and their significance is estimated. The coefficients make it possible to explain the pathways of the impurity transition observed in the commercial cells and predict the quality of cathode copper and the composition of slime when the anode composition changes. Calculations show that the accumulation of impurities in the cathodes is due to the occlusion of slime particles and the incomplete removal of the solution from the surface of commercial cathodes rather than electrochemical reactions. Attempts to improve and develop the technology of copper electrorefining should be focused on finding surfactants that would prevent the adsorption of suspended slime particles on the cathode surface, as well as on more completely washing the electrolyte off of them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. GOST (State Standard) no. 859–2014: Copper. Grades, Moscow: Standartinform, 2015.

  2. Baimakov, Yu.V. and Zhurin, A.I., Elektroliz v gidrometallurgii (Electrolysis for Hydrometallurgy), Moscow: Metallurgiya, 1977.

  3. Vol’khin, A.I., Eliseev, E.I., Zhukov, V.P., and Smirnov, B.N., Anodnaya i katodnaya med' (Anode and Cathode Copper), Chelyabinsk: Yuzhno-Ural’skoe Knizhnoe Izd., 2001.

  4. Schlesinger, M.E., King, M.J., Sole, K.C., and Davenport, W.G., Extractive Metallurgy of Copper, Elsevier, 2011, pp. 251–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-096789-9.10014-9

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Demin, I.P., Rudoi, V.M., Ostanin, N.I., and Plekhanov, K.A., Analysis of the ways for ingress of impurities into the cathode copper in the practice of electrolytic refining, Tsvetn. Met. (Moscow, Russ. Fed.), 2002, no. 5, pp. 23–28.

  6. Rudoy, V.M., Ostanin, N.I., Zaikov, Yu.P., Demin, I.P., and Ashikhin, V.V., The new approach to a choice of surfactants for electrorefining copper, Proc. European Metallurgical Conference EMS, Dresden, September 18–21, 2005, vol. 1, pp. 153–164.

  7. Noguchi, F., Iida, N., Nakamura, T., and Ueda, Y., Behaviour of anode impurities in copper electrorefining, Metal. Rev. MMIJ, 1992, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 83–98.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Möller, C.A., Bayanmunkh, M., and Friedrich, B., Influence of As, Sb, Bi and O on copper anode behaviour—Part 3: Elemental distribution, World Metall.–Erzmet., 2009, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 70–80.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zeng, W., Wang, S., and Free, M.L., Experimental and simulation studies of electrolyte flow and slime particle transport in a pilot scale copper electrorefining cell, J. Electrochem. Soc., 2016, vol. 163, no. 5, pp. E111–E122. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0181605jes

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Möller, C.A., Bayanmunkh, M., and Friedrich, B., Influence of As, Sb, Bi and O on copper anode behaviour—Part 2: Anode dissolution behaviour and anode sludge generation, World Metall.–Erzmet., 2009, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 6–16.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zeng, W., Free, M.L., and Wang, S., Studies of anode slime sintering/coalescence and its effects on anode slime adhesion and cathode purity in copper electrorefining, J. Electrochem. Soc., 2016, vol. 163, no. 2, pp. E14–E31. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0681602jes

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zeng, W., Free, M.L., Werner, J., and Wang, S., Simulation and validation studies of impurity particle behavior in copper electrorefining, J. Electrochem. Soc., 2015, vol. 162, no. 14, pp. E338–E352. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0561514jes

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zeng, W., Werner, J., and Free, M.L., Experimental studies on impurity particle behavior in electrolyte and the associated distribution on the cathode in the process of copper electrorefining, Hydrometallurgy, 2015, vol. 156, pp. 232–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2015.06.005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen, T.T. and Dutrizac, J.E., Mineralogical characterization of a copper anode and the anode slimes from the La Caridad Copper Refinery of Mexicana De Cobre, Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2005, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-005-0024-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen, T.T. and Dutrizac, J.E., A Mineralogical overview of the behavior of nickel during copper electrorefining, Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 1990, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02664190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Moats, M.S., Wang, S., and Kim, D., A review of the behavior and deportment of lead, bismuth, antimony and arsenic in copper electrorefining, Proc. T.T. Chen Honorary Symposium on Hydrometallurgy, Electrometallurgy and Materials Characterization, Orlando, FL, March 11–15, 2012, pp. 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118364833.ch1

  17. Bounoughaz, M., Manzini, M., and Ghali, E., Behaviour of copper anodes containing oxygen, silver and selenium impurities during electro-refining, Can. Metall. Q., 1995, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-4433(94)00014-B

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang, S., Impurity control and removal in copper tankhouse operations, JOM, 2004, vol. 56, no. 7, pp. 34–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-004-0089-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gu, Z.H., Chen, J., and Fahidy, T.Z., A study of anodic slime behavior in the electrorefining of copper, Hydrometallurgy, 1995, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 149–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-386X(94)00044-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang, X., Chen, Q., Yin, Z., Wang, M., Xiao, B., and Zhang, F., Homogeneous precipitation of As, Sb and Bi impurities in copper electrolyte during electrorefining, Hydrometallurgy, 2011, vol. 105, nos. 3–4, pp. 355–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2010.10.004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen, T.T. and Dutrizac, J.E., Mineralogy of copper electrorefining, JOM, 1990, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03221053

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jafari, S., Kiviluoma, M., Kalliomäki, T., Klindtworth, E., Arif Tirto Ajia, Aromaa, J., Wilson, B.P., and Lundströma, M., Effect of typical impurities for the formation of floating slimes in copper electrorefining, Int. J. Miner. Process., 2017, vol. 168, no. 10, pp. 109–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.minpro.2017.09.016

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work is performed in the frame of the State Assignment number 075-03-2020-582/1 dated 18.02.2020 (the theme number 0836-2020-0037).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ural Federal University, 620002, Yekaterinburg, Russia

    N. I. Ostanin, V. M. Rudoy, T. N. Ostanina & V. S. Nikitin

  2. Ural Research Technological Institute, 620027, Yekaterinburg, Russia

    I. P. Demin

Authors
  1. N. I. Ostanin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. V. M. Rudoy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. I. P. Demin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. T. N. Ostanina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. V. S. Nikitin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. I. Ostanin.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ostanin, N.I., Rudoy, V.M., Demin, I.P. et al. Statistical Analysis of the Distribution of Impurities during Copper Electrorefining. Russ. J. Non-ferrous Metals 62, 501–507 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1067821221050102

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1067821221050102

Keywords:

Search

Navigation