Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical comparison of classical and permutation statistical hypothesis testing methods

  • Mathematics
  • Published:
Vestnik St. Petersburg University: Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article is devoted to the classical problem of statistical hypothesis testing for the equality of two distributions. For normal distributions, Student’s test is optimal in many senses. However, in practice, distributions to be compared are often not normal and, generally speaking, unknown. When nothing is known about the distributions to be compared, one usually applies the nonparametric Kolmogorov–Smirnov test to solve this problem. In the present paper, methods are considered that are based on permutations and, in recent years, have attracted interest for their simplicity, universality, and relatively high efficiency. Methods of stochastic simulation are applied to the comparative analysis of the power of a few permutation tests and classical methods (such as the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, Student’s test, and the Mann–Whitney test) for a wide class of distribution functions. Normal distributions, Cauchy distributions, and their mixtures, as well as exponential, Weibull, Fisher’s, and Student’s distributions are considered. It is established that, for many typical distributions, the permutation method based on the sum of the absolute values of differences is the most powerful one. The advantage of this method over other ones is especially large when one compares symmetric distributions with the same centers. Thus, this permutation method can be recommended for application in cases when the distributions to be compared are different from normal ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. L. Lehmann, Testing Statistical Hypotheses (Wiley, New York, 1959).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Sirski, “On the statistical analysis of functional data arising from designed experiments,” PhD Thesis (Univ. of Manitoba, Manitoba, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. Corain, V. B. Melas, A. Pepelyshev, and L. Salmaso, “New insights on permutation approach for hypothesis testing on functional data,” Adv. Data Anal. Classif. 8, (3), 339–356 (2014).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Sturino, I. Zorych, B. Mallick, et al., “Statistical methods for comparative phenomics using high-throughput phenotype microarrays,” Int. J. Biostat. 6, 3–4 (2010).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. D. Cox and J. Lee, “Pointwise testing with functional data using the Westfall-Young randomization method,” Biometrika 95, 621–634 (2008).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. J. Ramsay, G. Hooker, and S. Graves, Functional Data Analysis with R and MATLAB (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2009).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. S. Keller-McNulty and J. J. Higgins, “Effect of tail weight and outliers on power and type-i error of robust permutation tests for location,” Commun. Stat.–Simul. Comput. 16, 17–35 (1987).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. E. S. Edgington, “Approximate randomization tests,” J. Psychol. 72, 143–149 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. P. I. Good, Resampling Methods: A Practical Guide to Data Analysis, 3rd ed (Birkhäuser, Boston, 2005).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. B. Melas.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © V.B. Melas, D.I. Sal’nikov, A.O. Gudulina, 2016, published in Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta. Seriya 1. Matematika, Mekhanika, Astronomiya, 2016, No. 3, pp. 415–423.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Melas, V.B., Sal’nikov, D.I. & Gudulina, A.O. Numerical comparison of classical and permutation statistical hypothesis testing methods. Vestnik St.Petersb. Univ.Math. 49, 248–255 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1063454116030092

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1063454116030092

Keywords

Navigation